Re: Why the Bohr model failed

From	Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Why the Bohr model failed
Date	2018-04-02 14:28 +0200
Organization	news.eternal-september.org
Message-ID	<p9t7mb$sfo$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<fe87efc7-432a-4854-b2fd-8f4e99aee19c@googlegroups.com> <p9oh7v$ij9$1@pcls7.std.com> <p9oirg$858$1@dont-email.me> <p9t21d$4f7$4@pcls7.std.com>

Show all headers | View raw

moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) Wrote in message:
> >Dne 31/03/2018 v 19:41 Michael Moroney napsal(a):
>>> john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:
>>> 
>>>> It failed quite simply because a circular orbital is two dimensional, and 
>>>> an atom is three dimensional.
>>> 
>>> No, John, the Bohr Model is a failure because an electron going round and
>>> round like a planet in its orbit would radiate its energy away, and crash
>>> into the nucleus.
> 
>>Are you sure you are not confusing it
>>with Rutheford's planetary model ?
> 
> No. Both the Rutheford and Bohr model show the electrons in circular 
> orbits around the nucleus.  Rutheford's model is shown as the classic
> "atom" from Atomic whatever logos.  Bohr shows concentric circular orbits
> and emphasizes the jumps of energy between them.
> 
Not on later Bohr-Sommerfeld modifications, that have ellliptic
 orbits with the same energy and different angular
 momentum.

Sure, it was obsolete when the quantum model based of 
 Schroedinger equation was created.

-- 
Libor Striz aka Poutnik ( a pilgrim/wanderer/wayfarer)


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

Thread

Why the Bohr model failed john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-03-31 08:37 -0700
  Re: Why the Bohr model failed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-03-31 17:41 +0000
    Re: Why the Bohr model failed Libor 'Poutnik' Stříž <poutnik@privacy.net> - 2018-03-31 20:08 +0200
      Re: Why the Bohr model failed moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-02 10:52 +0000
        Re: Why the Bohr model failed Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-04-02 14:28 +0200
          Re: Why the Bohr model failed poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-04-02 09:05 -0700
            Re: Why the Bohr model failed Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-04-02 18:27 +0200
              Re: Why the Bohr model failed poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-04-02 10:25 -0700
                Re: Why the Bohr model failed poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-04-03 10:21 -0700
        Re: Why the Bohr model failed poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-04-02 06:21 -0700
          Re: Why the Bohr model failed poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-04-02 09:02 -0700
  Re: Why the Bohr model failed Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-03-31 14:32 -0700
    Re: Why the Bohr model failed poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-03-31 19:57 -0700
      Re: Why the Bohr model failed Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-04-01 13:53 -0700
        Re: Why the Bohr model failed poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-04-01 22:58 -0700
          Re: Why the Bohr model failed Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-04-15 20:36 +0100
            Re: Why the Bohr model failed poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-04-15 17:51 -0700
            Re: Why the Bohr model failed poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-04-15 23:32 -0700
              Re: Why the Bohr model failed poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-04-18 23:23 -0700

csiph-web