Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > rocksolid.shared.security > #31
| From | Anonymous <poster@anon.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | rocksolid.shared.security |
| Subject | has anyone ever ? |
| Date | 2020-09-24 11:58 -0700 |
| Organization | i2pn2 (i2pn.org) |
| Message-ID | <opsec.729.1bdo7m@anon.com> (permalink) |
| References | <opsec.726.wiq8f@anon.com> |
>has anybody ever analysed tor & i2p about their degree of anonymity yet? tor is very well researched by now, with many papers on possible attacks and other interesting stuff. i2p on the other hand is much less researched (because much less known). i agree to the concrete recommendations of the previous posts, and i would like to add: it depends a lot on what you want to achieve and who your (potential) enemy is, if you want to look a pron pics without your parents internetfilter screwing it up for you, either one is fine (I mean tor or i2p). if you want to do the Assange thing, none of them will be enough. if you want to run a darknet market for drugs or weapons, i2p is safer imo, but will also attract less customers. so it all depends on what you want and who is after you. -- Posted on def2
Back to rocksolid.shared.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
degree of anonymity Anonymous <poster@anon.com> - 2020-09-22 23:39 -0700 Re: degree of anonymity Marc SCHAEFER <schaefer@alphanet.ch> - 2020-09-23 09:50 +0200 Re: degree of anonymity rslightuser@rslight.i2p (rslightuser) - 2020-09-23 08:37 +0000 has anyone ever ? Anonymous <poster@anon.com> - 2020-09-24 11:58 -0700 comparison server vs user Anonymous <poster@anon.com> - 2020-09-24 12:05 -0700 http://dropbox.i2p/?gSC3wMKGuRchuL9a6WpcGxxeZKG Anonymous <poster@anon.com> - 2020-12-11 14:38 -0800
csiph-web