Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > rocksolid.shared.security > #32
| From | Anonymous <poster@anon.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | rocksolid.shared.security |
| Subject | comparison server vs user |
| Date | 2020-09-24 12:05 -0700 |
| Organization | i2pn2 (i2pn.org) |
| Message-ID | <opsec.730.1i6zr3@anon.com> (permalink) |
| References | <opsec.726.wiq8f@anon.com> |
another angle to look at is: are you browsing/getting content or are you offering some service (a website, for example). ihmo the usage of the torbrowser on onion sites is safer than the usage of $browser plugged into the i2p proxy. on the other hand running a service and concealing your identity over a longer time period is better achieved with i2p. i think it is due to the design: i2p was made for this, while for tor it an addon. -- Posted on def2
Back to rocksolid.shared.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
degree of anonymity Anonymous <poster@anon.com> - 2020-09-22 23:39 -0700 Re: degree of anonymity Marc SCHAEFER <schaefer@alphanet.ch> - 2020-09-23 09:50 +0200 Re: degree of anonymity rslightuser@rslight.i2p (rslightuser) - 2020-09-23 08:37 +0000 has anyone ever ? Anonymous <poster@anon.com> - 2020-09-24 11:58 -0700 comparison server vs user Anonymous <poster@anon.com> - 2020-09-24 12:05 -0700 http://dropbox.i2p/?gSC3wMKGuRchuL9a6WpcGxxeZKG Anonymous <poster@anon.com> - 2020-12-11 14:38 -0800
csiph-web