Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #37322
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes |
| Date | 2017-08-20 12:28 -0400 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <oncdbs$70j$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <87valie4xz.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> <onc3s5$1ns5$1@gioia.aioe.org> <87o9rae27u.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> <onc96e$1vqj$1@gioia.aioe.org> <87h8x2dxp1.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> |
On 8/20/2017 12:13 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote: > Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> writes: >>> Nope, it shows that the H2 driver does follow the standards (and the >>> SQLite3 driver does not). The first ResultSet is closed as it should >>> be. You can do an isClosed on it. So it is not null, but displays a >>> null to show you should not use it anymore. >> >> The contract for toString is extremely vague. >> >> I do not see any indication than SQLite does not follow >> JDBC standard. >> >> Reusing result set object should be perfectly valid >> per JDBC standard. > > In the description of Statement (copied with spelling mistakes): > All execution methods in the Statement interface implicitly close > a statment's current ResultSet object if an open one exists. It is exactly because of this that I think reuse is valid. Arne
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Testing the functionality of sub classes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-19 19:40 +0200
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-19 21:44 +0200
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-08-19 16:47 -0400
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-20 01:30 +0200
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2017-08-20 11:50 +0000
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-20 14:49 +0200
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-20 15:36 +0200
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-08-20 09:46 -0400
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2017-08-20 14:33 +0000
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-08-20 11:14 -0400
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-20 16:35 +0200
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-08-20 11:17 -0400
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-20 18:13 +0200
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-08-20 12:28 -0400
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-08-20 13:06 -0400
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-20 19:07 +0200
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-08-20 11:21 -0400
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-20 18:17 +0200
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2017-08-21 19:53 +0000
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2017-08-19 21:15 +0000
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-20 01:36 +0200
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-20 01:22 +0200
csiph-web