Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #37323
| From | Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes |
| Date | 2017-08-20 18:17 +0200 |
| Organization | Decebal Computing |
| Message-ID | <87d17qdxj5.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <ona7tq$igi$1@dont-email.me> <87pobrf855.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> <slrnopiu4a.o2q.avl@logic.at> <87ziaue74o.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> <onc9ed$e1$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> writes:
> On 8/20/2017 8:49 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> Just to satisfy my curiosity I executed (I do not like the formatting,
>> but that is what Eclipse does):
>> try (
>> Statement stmt = conn.createStatement();
>> ResultSet rsOne = stmt.executeQuery("SELECT 12 AS twelve");
>> ResultSet rsTwo = stmt.executeQuery("SELECT 'Hello World!' AS message")
>> ) {
>> System.out.println(stmt);
>> System.out.println(rsOne);
>> System.out.println(rsTwo);
>> }
>>
>> And this gives:
>> org.sqlite.jdbc4.JDBC4Statement@685f4c2e
>> org.sqlite.jdbc4.JDBC4ResultSet@7daf6ecc
>> org.sqlite.jdbc4.JDBC4ResultSet@7daf6ecc
>>
>> So yes, it is like you said: the ResultSet is reused. Is also more
>> logical. I jumped to a conclusion.
>
> As soon as the second executeQuery is running then whatever rsOne
> is pointing to is supposed to be toast.
>
> So SQLite JDBC driver apparently decide to reuse the object for
> the second executeQuery.
>
> Maybe unexpected, but I believe it is OK per spec.
In the description of Statement (copied with spelling mistakes):
All execution methods in the Statement interface implicitly close
a statment's current ResultSet object if an open one exists.
Well, maybe you could say it is OK to reuse the old one, but it
certainly does surprise me.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Testing the functionality of sub classes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-19 19:40 +0200
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-19 21:44 +0200
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-08-19 16:47 -0400
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-20 01:30 +0200
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2017-08-20 11:50 +0000
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-20 14:49 +0200
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-20 15:36 +0200
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-08-20 09:46 -0400
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2017-08-20 14:33 +0000
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-08-20 11:14 -0400
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-20 16:35 +0200
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-08-20 11:17 -0400
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-20 18:13 +0200
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-08-20 12:28 -0400
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-08-20 13:06 -0400
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-20 19:07 +0200
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-08-20 11:21 -0400
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-20 18:17 +0200
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2017-08-21 19:53 +0000
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2017-08-19 21:15 +0000
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-20 01:36 +0200
Re: Testing the functionality of sub classes Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-08-20 01:22 +0200
csiph-web