Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #644384
| From | Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O |
| Date | 2017-08-04 13:34 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <om2eoh$kqa$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <897beeb8-eb5a-4342-a21f-ec81066380ca@googlegroups.com> <22403d1b-e1e4-41ed-a676-022bec7b022e@googlegroups.com> <f02b80d9-e135-41c1-bdb8-6af452159476@googlegroups.com> |
On 7/28/2017 7:35 AM, Edward Prochak wrote: McGinn is a troll, and crank, he also goes by Cladius Denk, and snoring Pornadoes [the following is from posts by the known troll/crank McGinn/Denk/SolventPotatoes from the past few days, it shows his ANGER levels are off the charts, unable to hold a coherent conversation, and mentions use of LSD, **** are swear words. AP News Article 3987261 Aug 2, 2017] "you ******* stupid *** and why you think it is relevant SINCE THE ISSUE UNDER DISCUSSION DOESN'T INVOLVE ANY OF THIS YOU STINKING, SLIMEY TROLL!!! So the **** what? Do you trolls ever have a relevant point? No, retard, it is liquid. ******* read the phase diagram you mental retard. No, *******. What the **** is wrong with you people? Individually nobody could be a dumb as you all are collectively. So, everbody in the world except you and your fellow trolls are liars? Did I get this right? Or am I lying about this too? Do your methods in any way involve pixie dust? Tea leaves? Crystal balls? LSD? Gary, I think you have to get out of your bubble and look around every once in a while. You are not the only person on this planet that has an advanced theory whose reasonable assertions are being attacked by *******, brain-dead trolls. you post off topic **** on my video and give me a lecture ....****you **** you, bubble boy who thinks he is the only person in the world to ever make a scientific discovery. It's all about you isn't it, you self-centered, spoiled child. Why don't you throw a pity party so that you can wallow away into obscurity. ******* SAY IT WAS A THERMODYNAMIC STABILITY DIAGRAM. It's ******* right there plain as day. There is nothing to discuss or debate. This is a trivial artifact that you trolls are blowing all out of proportion. Go find another hobby, you ******* troll. Wow! You are one amazing ******. This is such a stupid comment I don' t know how to respond." - McGinn/Denk/SolventPotatoes James McGinn's Retraction; "The notion that moist air is always heavier per volume than dry air is refuted. It is proven false. It is mistaken. It is wrong." McGinn's statement is the result of his final realization that his unproven theory consists of only science fiction, his imagination and verbal hand waving that doesn't make any sense to anyone. > 11/22/14 James McGinn, Mr Solving Tornadoes, RETRACTS HIS BOOK "Solving Tornadoes" after plagiarism found ................................... from his previous post; "Well, let's just say that it ain't no textbook. The confusion you are feeling is by design. And it's not so simple as me having an objection to pandering to my audience. It's more like I recognize that most consumers of science are looking for an excuse not to think. I wrote it with with the intention of giving you no avenue of escape. You can try to dispute it if you want. But, let's face it, you're already entangled. If you struggle you'll just become more entangled. And there's no way out -- without thinking. Sorry. My only advice is that if you haven't gotten to the third chapter yet stop now. But it sounds like it's too late for that. Oh well. You had a good run. And it's not like me making you think is some kind of violation of your civil rights or something. " Best of James McGinn (all that could be found, could not find any math or science anywhere) "1. The internet makes it easy for people with strong beliefs to become seduced into believing that their beliefs are factual. And that is all the rationalization they need to start lying. 2. "The notion that moist air is always heavier per volume than dry air is refuted. It is proven false. It is mistaken. It is wrong." 3. My inability to convince the hindquarters of a dead cow of anything only reflects on the status of the cow's hindquarters. 4. Scientific methods were developed so that people like you don't turn science into a religion 5. I'm not a liar. 6 McGinn is right. 7. I concur with McGinn and Denk. Yes, McGinn and Denk are corrects. 8. I think that is just Claudius screwing with you. 9. BTW, I'm even more of an expert on human evolution than I am an expert on meteorology and physics 10. I am mainstream science... Nobody can contradict this assertion. 11. Can you provide a Denk to any purported reproducible experimental evidence to substantiate this assertion? 12. McGinn's Book Review: *insane rambling* 1 out of 5 stars The author believes that elementary concepts, which have been taught to and understood by first year Chemistry and Physics students for many decades, are some kind of meteorological conspiracy. The author also does not understand the very basic physics that drive convective updrafts (the positive buoyancy due to warm temperature anomalies that result from latent heat release). Instead, apparently based largely on reading websites, he proposes a mechanism that makes no physical sense and is totally unobserved and unobservable. This text violates even basic tenets of logic. Totally without merit. 13. McGinn Book Review *Waste of time a non-funny joke* 1.0 out of 5 stars This book misleads the reader on basic physical concepts like density, the basics of weather dynamics, and offers a silly idea that confuses metaphors about how the jet stream operates with reality. It solves nothing but does offer a way to waste time and money buying and reading it. This book is an example of the risks posed in the age of inexpensive self publishing by assholes. 14. You can't even imagine how frustrating it must be to be so sure I am right, but so completely unable to say how or why. 15. I got nothing!!!
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 18:46 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 02:27 +0000
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 19:38 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 02:52 +0000
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 19:57 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 11:40 +0000
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 23:56 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-07-28 10:37 +0000
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 09:54 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-07-29 16:29 +0000
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2017-07-29 09:52 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-29 21:03 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 13:51 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 13:54 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 11:40 +0000
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 09:57 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-31 12:07 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-31 21:01 -0500
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-04 13:36 -0500
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 19:52 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 22:22 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 05:35 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 09:59 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 10:45 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 10:58 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 14:52 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 15:38 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 10:53 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 11:47 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 10:17 -0500
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 10:16 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 15:37 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-08-04 11:10 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-28 18:26 -0500
Re: Often, fantasy is preferable to the truth, more productive. Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 16:28 -0700
Re: Often, fantasy is preferable to the truth, more productive. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-28 19:51 -0400
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 10:09 -0500
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 10:16 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 18:48 +0000
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 17:32 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-28 13:06 -0500
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-28 13:32 -0500
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 12:53 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 15:25 -0700
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-04 13:34 -0500
Re: Simple Question About Phase Diagram of H2O Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 22:22 -0700
csiph-web