Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #426689
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World |
| Date | 2017-07-31 09:00 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <olnd6q$10so$6@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <4ac230b6-744f-44dc-8b16-ef97cdd60872@googlegroups.com> <de06948f-6397-4be1-8832-2b197cd7ee29@googlegroups.com> <c9c963d2-92fd-481f-a588-c063ee84daa9@googlegroups.com> <197698f7-32a7-43a1-b2cf-ad14c0bda861@googlegroups.com> <8e136a2d-f1e0-4447-8387-aad77bc70bb7@googlegroups.com> |
On 7/28/17 9:17 AM, kenseto wrote: > On Friday, July 7, 2017 at 11:15:51 AM UTC-4, Gary Harnagel wrote: >> On Friday, July 7, 2017 at 9:04:51 AM UTC-6, kenseto wrote: >>> >>> The correct explanation: >> >> Incorrect! >> >>> During B’s entire journey B’s clock accumulates clock seconds at a slower >>> rate of 1/gamma than A. >> >> Wrong! >> >>> At no time B observe A’s clock accumulate clock seconds at a slower rate >>> than B’s clock. >> >> Abysmally wrong!! >> >>> Why? >> >> Because Seto is arrogantly ignorant. >> >> “ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge.” >> – Charles Darwin >> >>> Because B’s clock second contains a larger amount of time (absolute time). >> >> There is no such thing as "absolute time." I learned a lot since I came >> to this site, but Seto has learned absolutely nothing. >> > > Then please explain why current physics treats a clock second as an interval of absolute time. > It doesn't. You layer on additional assumptions (unjustified) which then distort the current physics treatment to something unrecognizable. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-06 23:26 -0700
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-07 06:01 -0700
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Ocho Hoshouwa <yeoh@eohotwa.ey> - 2017-07-08 11:16 +0000
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-07 06:29 -0700
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-07 06:47 -0700
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-07 08:04 -0700
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-07 08:15 -0700
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-28 07:17 -0700
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-28 17:11 +0000
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Jeèným Hová <hovae@ieuuio.org> - 2017-07-29 15:51 +0000
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 09:00 -0500
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-31 12:43 -0700
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-01 14:20 +0000
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 10:38 -0500
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-08 01:10 -0700
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-08 06:23 -0700
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Ocho Hoshouwa <yeoh@eohotwa.ey> - 2017-07-08 13:35 +0000
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 11:31 -0700
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Exandre Bertrand <aeid@xani.pr> - 2017-07-29 09:26 +0000
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-29 13:44 -0700
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Jeèným Ludnými <hovae@ieuuio.org> - 2017-07-29 21:03 +0000
csiph-web