Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #426814
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World |
| Date | 2017-08-01 14:20 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <olq2na$lab$5@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <c9c963d2-92fd-481f-a588-c063ee84daa9@googlegroups.com> <197698f7-32a7-43a1-b2cf-ad14c0bda861@googlegroups.com> <8e136a2d-f1e0-4447-8387-aad77bc70bb7@googlegroups.com> <olnd6q$10so$6@gioia.aioe.org> <bf8562f1-f464-462e-b0b1-64c3a61257e9@googlegroups.com> |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> writes: >On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 10:01:02 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> >> There is no such thing as "absolute time." I learned a lot since I came >> >> to this site, but Seto has learned absolutely nothing. >> > Then please explain why current physics treats a clock second as an >> > interval of absolute time. >> It doesn't. >> You layer on additional assumptions (unjustified) which then distort the >> current physics treatment to something unrecognizable. >Yes it does......once you say that the traveling twin is younger you >automatically assumed that the traveling twin's clock second contain the >same amount of absolute time as a stay at home clock second...... No, Stupid Ken. YOU assumed that the traveling twin's clock second contained something you made up that you call absolute time. Odd made no assumptions. Quit blaming Odd for your own failure to understand SR.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-06 23:26 -0700
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-07 06:01 -0700
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Ocho Hoshouwa <yeoh@eohotwa.ey> - 2017-07-08 11:16 +0000
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-07 06:29 -0700
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-07 06:47 -0700
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-07 08:04 -0700
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-07 08:15 -0700
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-28 07:17 -0700
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-28 17:11 +0000
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Jeèným Hová <hovae@ieuuio.org> - 2017-07-29 15:51 +0000
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 09:00 -0500
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-31 12:43 -0700
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-01 14:20 +0000
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 10:38 -0500
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-08 01:10 -0700
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-08 06:23 -0700
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Ocho Hoshouwa <yeoh@eohotwa.ey> - 2017-07-08 13:35 +0000
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 11:31 -0700
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Exandre Bertrand <aeid@xani.pr> - 2017-07-29 09:26 +0000
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-29 13:44 -0700
Re: Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Jeèným Ludnými <hovae@ieuuio.org> - 2017-07-29 21:03 +0000
csiph-web