Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #425831
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Most irrational speculations of physics |
| Date | 2017-07-22 08:48 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <okvl41$tu6$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <oktp9u$1scm$1@gioia.aioe.org> <0699ceed-a4b6-4c7e-9cd4-ebc47b3065ed@googlegroups.com> <oku6go$oos$2@gioia.aioe.org> <cdfca707-d648-4dea-85e7-69315c418e77@googlegroups.com> <okvfqj$jbm$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 7/22/2017 7:18 AM, Kurt Larrabee wrote: > rotchm wrote: > >> On Friday, July 21, 2017 at 8:33:32 PM UTC-4, Kurt Larrabee wrote: >>> rotchm wrote: >>> >>>> We are discussing if the expression " x(t) = t^2 " is an *equation* >>>> or not. >>> >>> no, it's a function, as described by the Scientific Method. >>> x is a function of t. >> >> So what! We are not discussing if its a function; we are discussing the > > Amazing how all these half-engineers are failing seeing that function > immediately. Functions characterize by a direction > > INPUT(..) -> FUNCTION BLOCK -> OUTPUT(s) > > That equal sign is not very clever. Read it OUT LOUD, in words, Stephane. > You are not that stupid you appear. How about this one, x(t,s)=t^s. These > half-engineers are crazy. > I see you do not know math very well. *your definition* of function is incomplete, not precise, and wrong. you use undefined symbols. Extra Credit: Show how your definition of function is 1. incomplete 2. not precise 3. wrong 4. which symbols are undefined
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Most irrational speculations of physics "Edgar L. Owen" <Edgar@edgarlowen.com> - 2017-07-20 04:12 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 07:13 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics "Edgar L. Owen" <Edgar@edgarlowen.com> - 2017-07-20 07:42 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2017-07-20 07:57 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 11:21 -0400
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-20 17:22 +0000
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 08:57 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-20 17:20 +0000
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-20 17:17 +0000
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 17:05 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Esteban Viars <esane@snbvten.vt> - 2017-07-21 19:02 +0000
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 12:34 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Esteban Viars <esane@snbvten.vt> - 2017-07-21 20:47 +0000
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 16:03 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Kurt Larrabee <arb@twraa.ab> - 2017-07-22 00:33 +0000
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 19:39 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Kurt Larrabee <arb@twraa.ab> - 2017-07-22 12:18 +0000
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-22 08:48 -0500
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Kurt Larrabee <arb@twraa.ab> - 2017-07-22 15:20 +0000
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 07:49 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Kurt Larrabee <arb@twraa.ab> - 2017-07-22 15:36 +0000
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 09:49 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Kurt Larrabee <arb@twraa.ab> - 2017-07-22 17:14 +0000
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 10:52 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 10:53 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-22 13:15 -0500
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-22 18:21 -0400
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-07-22 19:55 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-30 20:25 -0500
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-31 17:19 -0400
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-21 18:11 -0500
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Kurt Larrabee <arb@twraa.ab> - 2017-07-22 00:28 +0000
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-21 20:21 -0500
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Kurt Larrabee <arb@twraa.ab> - 2017-07-22 12:19 +0000
Stephane Baune, aka "rotchm", adds a new imbecility to his many others "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-07-31 15:17 -0700
Re: Stephane Baune, aka "rotchm", adds a new imbecility to his many others rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 15:47 -0700
Re: Stephane Baune, aka "rotchm", adds a new imbecility to his many others "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-07-31 17:07 -0700
Re: Stephane Baune, aka "rotchm", adds a new imbecility to his many others rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 18:07 -0700
Re: Stephane Baune, aka "rotchm", adds a new imbecility to his many others "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-07-31 19:06 -0700
Re: Stephane Baune, aka "rotchm", adds a new imbecility to his many others rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 19:12 -0700
Re: Stephane Baune, aka "rotchm", adds a new imbecility to his many others rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 19:13 -0700
Re: Stephane Baune, aka "rotchm", adds a new imbecility to his many others "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-07-31 20:20 -0700
Re: Stephane Baune, aka "rotchm", adds a new imbecility to his many others Jeèným Ludnými <hovae@ieuuio.org> - 2017-08-01 10:48 +0000
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-07-20 17:37 -0700
Most irrational speculations of physics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-07-20 07:58 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics shuba <thailao2558@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 10:05 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 18:16 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-20 23:18 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 10:49 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-23 07:03 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 16:04 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-31 23:23 -0700
csiph-web