Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #425781

Re: Most irrational speculations of physics

From Esteban Viars <esane@snbvten.vt>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject Re: Most irrational speculations of physics
Date 2017-07-21 20:47 +0000
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <oktp9u$1scm$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <e53989de-05e2-46a9-a287-e693d8a66953@googlegroups.com> <okqok3$2e4$5@gioia.aioe.org> <97010fe8-e629-4848-8cbc-13dba0c2803f@googlegroups.com> <oktj46$1a9j$2@gioia.aioe.org> <11922e6e-1017-4c2e-ba26-d06466d6e31f@googlegroups.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


rotchm wrote:

>> Is it? That equal sign distort you. It is actually also wrong.
>> Substitute that by an arrow, ie x(2) -> t²...
> 
> Hello idiot troll. Yes its an equation.
> noun 1. MATHEMATICS a statement that the values of two mathematical
> expressions are equal (indicated by the sign =). 
> 2. the process of equating one thing with another.

Another imbecile pushing up definitions as arguments. It must be right, 
since you chose the right definition, huh? No need for brain, this is so 
wonderful.

> Do you see the equals sing in  x(t) = t² ? Yes? hence its an equation by
> definition.

Listen up, stoopid, when a variable takes an input it depends on, then 
output a value, that's a FUNCTION, not an equation. Functions are usually 
ALL DIRECTIONAL, ie a change in output does NOT implies a change in INPUT.

ie this is false t² -> x(t). (and stupid)

Hopefully you just learned something and never ever will forget. You and 
your friend, morony, would never even pass an exam in half-engineering, my 
rotty. Who is the troll now, rotty boy.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Most irrational speculations of physics "Edgar L. Owen" <Edgar@edgarlowen.com> - 2017-07-20 04:12 -0700
  Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 07:13 -0700
    Re: Most irrational speculations of physics "Edgar L. Owen" <Edgar@edgarlowen.com> - 2017-07-20 07:42 -0700
      Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2017-07-20 07:57 -0700
        Re: Most irrational speculations of physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 11:21 -0400
          Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-20 17:22 +0000
      Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 08:57 -0700
      Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-20 17:20 +0000
    Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-20 17:17 +0000
      Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 17:05 -0700
        Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Esteban Viars <esane@snbvten.vt> - 2017-07-21 19:02 +0000
          Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 12:34 -0700
            Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Esteban Viars <esane@snbvten.vt> - 2017-07-21 20:47 +0000
              Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 16:03 -0700
                Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Kurt Larrabee <arb@twraa.ab> - 2017-07-22 00:33 +0000
                Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 19:39 -0700
                Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Kurt Larrabee <arb@twraa.ab> - 2017-07-22 12:18 +0000
                Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-22 08:48 -0500
                Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Kurt Larrabee <arb@twraa.ab> - 2017-07-22 15:20 +0000
                Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 07:49 -0700
                Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Kurt Larrabee <arb@twraa.ab> - 2017-07-22 15:36 +0000
                Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 09:49 -0700
                Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Kurt Larrabee <arb@twraa.ab> - 2017-07-22 17:14 +0000
                Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 10:52 -0700
                Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 10:53 -0700
                Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-22 13:15 -0500
                Re: Most irrational speculations of physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-22 18:21 -0400
                Re: Most irrational speculations of physics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-07-22 19:55 -0700
                Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-30 20:25 -0500
                Re: Most irrational speculations of physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-31 17:19 -0400
              Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-21 18:11 -0500
                Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Kurt Larrabee <arb@twraa.ab> - 2017-07-22 00:28 +0000
                Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-21 20:21 -0500
                Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Kurt Larrabee <arb@twraa.ab> - 2017-07-22 12:19 +0000
        Stephane Baune, aka "rotchm", adds a new imbecility to his many others "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-07-31 15:17 -0700
          Re: Stephane Baune, aka "rotchm", adds a new imbecility to his many others rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 15:47 -0700
            Re: Stephane Baune, aka "rotchm", adds a new imbecility to his many others "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-07-31 17:07 -0700
              Re: Stephane Baune, aka "rotchm", adds a new imbecility to his many others rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 18:07 -0700
                Re: Stephane Baune, aka "rotchm", adds a new imbecility to his many others "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-07-31 19:06 -0700
                Re: Stephane Baune, aka "rotchm", adds a new imbecility to his many others rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 19:12 -0700
                Re: Stephane Baune, aka "rotchm", adds a new imbecility to his many others rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 19:13 -0700
                Re: Stephane Baune, aka "rotchm", adds a new imbecility to his many others "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-07-31 20:20 -0700
                Re: Stephane Baune, aka "rotchm", adds a new imbecility to his many others Jeèným Ludnými <hovae@ieuuio.org> - 2017-08-01 10:48 +0000
    Re: Most irrational speculations of physics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-07-20 17:37 -0700
  Most irrational speculations of physics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-07-20 07:58 -0700
  Re: Most irrational speculations of physics shuba <thailao2558@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 10:05 -0700
  Re: Most irrational speculations of physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 18:16 -0700
    Re: Most irrational speculations of physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-20 23:18 -0700
      Re: Most irrational speculations of physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 10:49 -0700
        Re: Most irrational speculations of physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-23 07:03 -0700
          Re: Most irrational speculations of physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 16:04 -0700
            Re: Most irrational speculations of physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-31 23:23 -0700

csiph-web