Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #425803
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Most irrational speculations of physics |
| Date | 2017-07-21 20:21 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <oku9at$ssd$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <oktj46$1a9j$2@gioia.aioe.org> <11922e6e-1017-4c2e-ba26-d06466d6e31f@googlegroups.com> <oktp9u$1scm$1@gioia.aioe.org> <oku1n7$jmb$1@gioia.aioe.org> <oku689$oos$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 7/21/2017 7:28 PM, Kurt Larrabee wrote: > Serg io wrote: > >>>> Do you see the equals sing in x(t) = t² ? Yes? hence its an equation >>>> by definition. >>> >>> Listen up, stoopid, when a variable takes an input it depends on, then >>> output a value, that's a FUNCTION, >> >> wrong, it is still an equation as it has the = sign. > > Isn't x a function of t, hence a FUNCTION dependent of its input?? Can't > you read, moron. I am surrounded by morons. > x(t) = t² is an equation, x(t) is equated equal to t² using the equal sign, google "definition of the equal sign and equation". x(t) indicates x() is a function of t, under certain conditions. (it may not be a function) when you state what that function is, t², you use the equate sign, to form an equation. the reason you ae having problems with this, is that you surround yourself with morons. Don't do that, it will only make you stupider. Extra Credit: what certain conditions?
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Most irrational speculations of physics "Edgar L. Owen" <Edgar@edgarlowen.com> - 2017-07-20 04:12 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 07:13 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics "Edgar L. Owen" <Edgar@edgarlowen.com> - 2017-07-20 07:42 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2017-07-20 07:57 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 11:21 -0400
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-20 17:22 +0000
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 08:57 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-20 17:20 +0000
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-20 17:17 +0000
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 17:05 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Esteban Viars <esane@snbvten.vt> - 2017-07-21 19:02 +0000
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 12:34 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Esteban Viars <esane@snbvten.vt> - 2017-07-21 20:47 +0000
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 16:03 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Kurt Larrabee <arb@twraa.ab> - 2017-07-22 00:33 +0000
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 19:39 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Kurt Larrabee <arb@twraa.ab> - 2017-07-22 12:18 +0000
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-22 08:48 -0500
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Kurt Larrabee <arb@twraa.ab> - 2017-07-22 15:20 +0000
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 07:49 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Kurt Larrabee <arb@twraa.ab> - 2017-07-22 15:36 +0000
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 09:49 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Kurt Larrabee <arb@twraa.ab> - 2017-07-22 17:14 +0000
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 10:52 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 10:53 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-22 13:15 -0500
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-22 18:21 -0400
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-07-22 19:55 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-30 20:25 -0500
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-31 17:19 -0400
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-21 18:11 -0500
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Kurt Larrabee <arb@twraa.ab> - 2017-07-22 00:28 +0000
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-21 20:21 -0500
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Kurt Larrabee <arb@twraa.ab> - 2017-07-22 12:19 +0000
Stephane Baune, aka "rotchm", adds a new imbecility to his many others "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-07-31 15:17 -0700
Re: Stephane Baune, aka "rotchm", adds a new imbecility to his many others rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 15:47 -0700
Re: Stephane Baune, aka "rotchm", adds a new imbecility to his many others "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-07-31 17:07 -0700
Re: Stephane Baune, aka "rotchm", adds a new imbecility to his many others rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 18:07 -0700
Re: Stephane Baune, aka "rotchm", adds a new imbecility to his many others "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-07-31 19:06 -0700
Re: Stephane Baune, aka "rotchm", adds a new imbecility to his many others rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 19:12 -0700
Re: Stephane Baune, aka "rotchm", adds a new imbecility to his many others rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 19:13 -0700
Re: Stephane Baune, aka "rotchm", adds a new imbecility to his many others "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-07-31 20:20 -0700
Re: Stephane Baune, aka "rotchm", adds a new imbecility to his many others Jeèným Ludnými <hovae@ieuuio.org> - 2017-08-01 10:48 +0000
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-07-20 17:37 -0700
Most irrational speculations of physics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-07-20 07:58 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics shuba <thailao2558@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 10:05 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 18:16 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-20 23:18 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 10:49 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-23 07:03 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 16:04 -0700
Re: Most irrational speculations of physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-31 23:23 -0700
csiph-web