Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #639441
| From | Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Does this create downward pressure; is it a spoiler. |
| Date | 2017-07-08 12:22 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <ojr4cl$ian$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <595eed80$0$34591$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com> <1ns0mctbv1ar6msmdljgmfrdah0ssd31b4@4ax.com> <ojqvvv0aov@news3.newsguy.com> <ojr1sj$eq9$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ojr3ib01e6l@news4.newsguy.com> |
On 7/8/2017 12:08 PM, F. Russell wrote: > On Sat, 08 Jul 2017 11:39:31 -0500, Sегg io wrote: > >> >> But that force is quite small. >> > > However, reduction in drag is always very important, but it is doubtful > that the common auto spoiler can have much effect in this area. > > The trucking industry has been "streamlining" trucks because > the fuel savings can be quite significant. Here is a link: > > https://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/programs/environment-etv-menu-eng-2939.html > > Railroad companies have also been experimenting with drag reduction > techniques. Union Pacific, for example, has the "aero wedge:" > > http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=2526176 > > http://www.uprr.com/newsinfo/releases/environment/2013/0903_arrowedge.shtml > > > The only way to effectively reduce drag on automobiles would be > to introduce drastic changes in shape which most buyers would > reject. > totally agree, streamlining reduces gas consumption but some sports cars have been streamlined for a while, they could improve too. Some mags list the aero coeficient for the cars. Mustang went from a brick in the 90s to more streamlined in the 2015 But then there is the SUV crowd... And the 4 wheel Truck crowd
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Does this create downward pressure; is it a spoiler. micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2017-07-06 19:39 -0400
Re: Does this create downward pressure; is it a spoiler. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-06 23:56 +0000
Re: Does this create downward pressure; is it a spoiler. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-06 22:10 -0400
Re: Does this create downward pressure; is it a spoiler. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-07 05:01 +0000
Re: Does this create downward pressure; is it a spoiler. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-08 21:47 -0400
Re: Does this create downward pressure; is it a spoiler. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-09 05:07 +0000
Re: Does this create downward pressure; is it a spoiler. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-10 18:08 -0400
Re: Does this create downward pressure; is it a spoiler. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-10 22:23 +0000
Re: Does this create downward pressure; is it a spoiler. micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2017-07-08 02:15 -0400
Re: Does this create downward pressure; is it a spoiler. "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-07-08 16:07 +0000
Re: Does this create downward pressure; is it a spoiler. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-08 11:39 -0500
Re: Does this create downward pressure; is it a spoiler. "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-07-08 17:08 +0000
Re: Does this create downward pressure; is it a spoiler. Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-08 12:22 -0500
Re: Does this create downward pressure; is it a spoiler. micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2017-07-10 23:41 -0400
Re: Does this create downward pressure; is it a spoiler. "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-07-08 16:17 +0000
Re: Does this create downward pressure; is it a spoiler. "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-07-08 16:36 +0000
Re: Does this create downward pressure; is it a spoiler. Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2017-07-09 18:07 -0400
Re: Does this create downward pressure; is it a spoiler. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-09 15:36 -0700
Re: Does this create downward pressure; is it a spoiler. micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2017-07-10 23:35 -0400
csiph-web