Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize

From	Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize
Date	2017-07-06 19:19 -0500
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<ojmk38$9if$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(6 earlier) <7c19c002-f232-494d-9dcd-c6e88efe1a51@googlegroups.com> <d2a53357-cbb9-479f-98b2-c55bcf5a8d29@googlegroups.com> <f3a2835f-be73-4a08-9064-deca2112ef73@googlegroups.com> <a58db288-dba6-4b9c-bd6b-eb0ca1122948@googlegroups.com> <ojm6f4$12sd$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw

On 7/6/2017 3:27 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 7/6/17 2:51 PM, Claudius Denk wrote:
>> On Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at 11:07:39 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> No, Jim, that is clearly *not* my argument. Why would you think such 
>>> a thing?
>>
>> You have no argument.  But you don't want everbody else to realize 
>> this.  So you keep dodging the argument.
>>
>>> I never claimed that *everybody* knows this, I claimed that all 
>>> actual physicists know this... which you would know, too, if you were 
>>> and actual physicist.
>>

>>>
>>> Do you have those experiments that support your own tenuous positions
>>
>> Steam tables are available to all.
> 
> Here's one:
> https://www.steamtablesonline.com/Steam97Web.aspx
> 
> Perhaps you can show me where in these steam table is the demonstration 
> that no gaseous water exists below the boiling point of water.
> 
> If you'd rather not use this one, feel free to cite another one.
> 


that URL also has Gas Tables!!

checkout #8 on top of that URL screen,
you can easily see gasious H2O exists easily far below boiling point of 
water (100C)

Case Closed.   McGinn loses. Again.

Thread

Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 09:41 -0700
  Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-04 11:41 -0700
    Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 12:49 -0700
      Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-04 16:18 -0700
        Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 16:50 -0700
          Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-04 17:22 -0700
            Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 22:57 -0700
              Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-04 23:07 -0700
                Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 23:23 -0700
                Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-05 07:47 -0500
                Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 09:25 -0700
                Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 12:51 -0700
                Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 15:27 -0500
                Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 14:06 -0700
                Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 14:55 -0700
                Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-06 19:19 -0500
                Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 18:31 -0700
                Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-08 15:19 -0700
            Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 12:18 -0700
        Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-08 11:42 -0700
          Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-08 15:21 -0700
    Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-04 19:42 -0500
      Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 23:02 -0700
    Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 12:52 -0700
      Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-06 15:19 -0700
        Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 18:30 -0700
        Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-09 08:54 -0700
          Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-09 13:16 -0700
            Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-09 16:45 -0700
              Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-09 20:31 -0700
                Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2017-07-09 20:54 -0700
                Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-09 23:31 -0500

csiph-web