Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize
Date	2017-07-06 15:27 -0500
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<ojm6f4$12sd$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <2cb4146f-f150-4726-9ea5-867481e37bef@googlegroups.com> <7c19c002-f232-494d-9dcd-c6e88efe1a51@googlegroups.com> <d2a53357-cbb9-479f-98b2-c55bcf5a8d29@googlegroups.com> <f3a2835f-be73-4a08-9064-deca2112ef73@googlegroups.com> <a58db288-dba6-4b9c-bd6b-eb0ca1122948@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 7/6/17 2:51 PM, Claudius Denk wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at 11:07:39 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
>> No, Jim, that is clearly *not* my argument. Why would you think such a thing?
> 
> You have no argument.  But you don't want everbody else to realize this.  So you keep dodging the argument.
> 
>> I never claimed that *everybody* knows this, I claimed that all actual physicists know this... which you would know, too, if you were and actual physicist.
> 
> You make being a physicist sound like a religion.
> 
> Only a fool would believe such nonsense.
> 
> You got nothing.
> 
> 
>>
>> Do you have those experiments that support your own tenuous positions
> 
> Steam tables are available to all.

Here's one:
https://www.steamtablesonline.com/Steam97Web.aspx

Perhaps you can show me where in these steam table is the demonstration 
that no gaseous water exists below the boiling point of water.

If you'd rather not use this one, feel free to cite another one.

> 
> Maybe you should look.
> 
> You are a fool.
> 


-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Thread

Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 09:41 -0700
  Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-04 11:41 -0700
    Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 12:49 -0700
      Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-04 16:18 -0700
        Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 16:50 -0700
          Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-04 17:22 -0700
            Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 22:57 -0700
              Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-04 23:07 -0700
                Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 23:23 -0700
                Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-05 07:47 -0500
                Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 09:25 -0700
                Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 12:51 -0700
                Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 15:27 -0500
                Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 14:06 -0700
                Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 14:55 -0700
                Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-06 19:19 -0500
                Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 18:31 -0700
                Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-08 15:19 -0700
            Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 12:18 -0700
        Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-08 11:42 -0700
          Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-08 15:21 -0700
    Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-04 19:42 -0500
      Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 23:02 -0700
    Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 12:52 -0700
      Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-06 15:19 -0700
        Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 18:30 -0700
        Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-09 08:54 -0700
          Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-09 13:16 -0700
            Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-09 16:45 -0700
              Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-09 20:31 -0700
                Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2017-07-09 20:54 -0700
                Re: 'Cold Steam' Controversy: six things to recognize Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-09 23:31 -0500

csiph-web