Groups > sci.electronics.design > #462593

Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die

From	rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.electronics.design
Subject	Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die
Date	2017-06-01 14:56 -0400
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<ogpnqd$f1$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<418a5ff2-84b1-48a9-8def-825d2a699043@googlegroups.com> <oqjuicht9fdpjc4l72onui4cbjjkv4onua@4ax.com> <6719f89f-2672-439b-878e-6128b0ff0bae@googlegroups.com> <9qh0jcd0d2mmrse6ppqbv1bpdrbm0jtehk@4ax.com> <f54fffae-a5f5-4d54-84a2-ad2c7d6b1cea@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote on 6/1/2017 1:14 PM:
> Den torsdag den 1. juni 2017 kl. 18.58.11 UTC+2 skrev k...@notreal.com:
>> On Wed, 31 May 2017 23:27:10 -0700 (PDT), Klaus Kragelund
>> <klauskvik@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Advantages: Flash is loaded to SRAM, so zero wait stage performance, almost double as a standard M3....
>>
>> Huh?  ARMs are flash rich and SRAM poor.  If you want double the
>> performance, go to an M7.  SRAM is expensive.
>
> yeh, afair from when I was involved with something similar, SRAM is something
> like 4x the die area and higher standby current than flash
>
> the though I guess some of the die area penalty might be reduced by being able to use smaller process that doesn't have flash

Is there any reason to argue the concept when the details can be viewed? 
Er, ah, I can't seem to find any data sheets on their MCUs.  The web site is 
rather goofy.  It has a selection guide, but once you locate a part number 
there are no links to more info.  I found a page with data sheets, but none 
for the MCUs.  Very strange.

-- 

Rick C

Thread

Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die klaus.kragelund@gmail.com - 2017-05-31 16:08 -0700
  Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-05-31 19:22 -0400
    Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die Klaus Kragelund <klauskvik@hotmail.com> - 2017-05-31 23:27 -0700
      Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-01 12:58 -0400
        Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-06-01 10:14 -0700
          Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-06-01 14:56 -0400
            Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-01 18:21 -0400
              Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-06-01 15:37 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-01 18:40 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-06-01 15:55 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-01 19:03 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die Klaus Kragelund <klauskvik@hotmail.com> - 2017-06-01 16:47 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die Klaus Kragelund <klauskvik@hotmail.com> - 2017-06-01 16:51 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die pcdhobbs@gmail.com - 2017-06-01 17:09 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-06-01 17:12 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-01 20:17 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-06-01 20:04 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die klaus.kragelund@gmail.com - 2017-06-02 01:13 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 11:21 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die klaus.kragelund@gmail.com - 2017-06-02 09:51 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die klaus.kragelund@gmail.com - 2017-06-02 10:01 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 13:38 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die Klaus Kragelund <klauskvik@hotmail.com> - 2017-06-02 10:47 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 15:22 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die Klaus Kragelund <klauskvik@hotmail.com> - 2017-06-02 12:36 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 15:54 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-01 20:20 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-01 20:24 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die klaus.kragelund@gmail.com - 2017-06-02 01:19 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-02 12:47 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die klaus.kragelund@gmail.com - 2017-06-02 09:56 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-02 17:35 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die klaus.kragelund@gmail.com - 2017-06-02 15:43 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-02 18:58 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die Klaus Kragelund <klauskvik@hotmail.com> - 2017-06-02 16:27 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-02 19:31 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-03 15:09 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-03 20:35 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-01 20:10 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die klaus.kragelund@gmail.com - 2017-06-02 01:22 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-02 12:50 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die klaus.kragelund@gmail.com - 2017-06-02 01:24 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-06-02 15:38 +0200
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-02 12:51 -0400

csiph-web