Groups > sci.electronics.design > #460981

Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available

From	rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.electronics.design
Subject	Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available
Date	2017-05-19 17:58 -0400
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<ofnpjo$skp$2@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(7 earlier) <ofki3h$1b28$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ofkj8d$jof$1@dont-email.me> <ofktj4$1usa$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ofl4h4$gbf$1@dont-email.me> <ofnfim$8gj$1@news.datemas.de>

Show all headers | View raw

On 5/19/2017 3:03 PM, Jan Panteltje wrote:
> On a sunny day (Thu, 18 May 2017 16:46:41 -0500) it happened "Tim Williams"
> <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> wrote in <ofl4h4$gbf$1@dont-email.me>:
>
>> "Jan Panteltje" <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:ofktj4$1usa$1@gioia.aioe.org...
>>> 'in my view (tm)' anyways at some point some decennia ago it was
>>> postulated that you could
>>> look at / represent all particles in that standard model as a wave,
>>> There is a problem with that, nothing has mass.
>>
>> The Schroedinger equation has had a mass term in it, since the beginning,
>> before the Standard Model was a glimmer in anyones' eye.
>>
>> Tim
>
> Dear Tim,
> I will not challenge your near infinite wizzdom,
> but that is what professor Frank Linde explained.
> You can see the recording of his public lecture on Higgs here:
>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_2PqKtS0N0
>
>  At about 12 minutes into the video,
> note the shirt.
> It is in Dutch, so maybe we need an arbiter,
> maybe Bill Sloman speaks Dutch too?
>
> So, anyways as to the man and his cat (Schroedinger for those
> who have not heard of his cat), when I was in Copenhagen
> it became clear to me there is a finite probability that he went into that park and tried LSD,
> and since then did not know if his cat was alive or dead.
> A rational explanation I think, I am all for simple explanations :-).
> That not even taken into account that there were 2 other theories proposed
> in that Copenhagen conference, one of those De Broglie's, one that makes more sense to me.
>
> But I cannot sweep your argument just away, as I am a novice in this subject,
> in case of tronix I probably could if I only would,
> no well that is Simon and Garfunkel in reverse.
> Hope this helps.

Schroedinger never said he didn't know if his cat was alive or dead.  He 
only has to open the box and look.  Until then it exists both alive and 
dead... but not really.

-- 

Rick C

Thread

Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-16 07:57 +0000
  Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-05-16 07:04 -0700
    Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-16 14:39 +0000
      Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-16 14:48 +0000
      Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-05-16 08:28 -0700
        Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-16 16:42 +0000
          Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-05-16 10:01 -0700
            Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-16 19:05 +0000
              Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-18 16:28 +0000
                Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 12:51 -0400
                Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-05-18 12:27 -0700
                Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-18 19:44 +0000
                Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2017-05-18 16:46 -0500
                Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-19 19:03 +0000
                Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 17:58 -0400
                Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-20 07:05 +0000
                Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-20 04:13 -0400
                Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-05-20 09:23 -0700
                Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-20 20:55 +0000
                Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-05-18 12:25 -0700
                Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 20:04 -0400
                Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-18 21:07 -0700
  Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.really> - 2017-05-16 10:07 -0500
    Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-05-16 08:31 -0700
      Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available "tom" <tmiller11147@verizon.net> - 2017-05-16 11:58 -0400
        Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-05-16 09:51 -0700
          Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-16 19:06 +0000
            Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available krw@notreal.com - 2017-05-16 20:37 -0400
            Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-05-16 19:58 -0700
              Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-16 21:30 -0700
          Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available krw@notreal.com - 2017-05-16 20:37 -0400
      Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-05-16 13:03 -0400
        Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> - 2017-05-16 11:21 -0700
          Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2017-05-16 13:50 -0500
      Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2017-05-16 13:01 -0500
      Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-05-18 10:22 +0200
        Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-18 10:26 +0000
    Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-16 16:28 +0000

csiph-web