Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #460531
| From | Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available |
| Date | 2017-05-16 16:42 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <offa65$us2$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <ofebdv$18nn$1@gioia.aioe.org> <pd1mhchfu24n42q3n39a2kmd3ba89b35c2@4ax.com> <off2vr$i6i$1@gioia.aioe.org> <d4267ffa-5753-4941-9259-0cadd78e976b@googlegroups.com> |
On a sunny day (Tue, 16 May 2017 08:28:03 -0700 (PDT)) it happened George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> wrote in <d4267ffa-5753-4941-9259-0cadd78e976b@googlegroups.com>: >On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 10:40:01 AM UTC-4, Jan Panteltje wrote: >> On a sunny day (Tue, 16 May 2017 07:04:20 -0700) it happened John Larkin >> <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in >> <pd1mhchfu24n42q3n39a2kmd3ba89b35c2@4ax.com>: >> >> >On Tue, 16 May 2017 07:57:51 GMT, Jan Panteltje >> ><pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote: >> > >> >>Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available: >> >> http://panteltje.com/panteltje/tri_pic/ >> > >> >I have two betalights on the bed at the cabin, so we don't whack our >> >heads on the bedposts at night. It gets reageant-grade dark up there. >> >I just bought a new one for fun, and the old ones are maybe half as >> >bright after 5 years. There may be something else going on besides >> >pure half-life decay. >> > >> >https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/53724080/Truckee/Tritium.jpg >> > >> >I guess I'll replace both. >> >> Extract: >> >> >> May 2013 light1 888 light2 911 >> May 2014 light1 829 light2 851 >> May 2015 light1 773 light2 792 >> May 2016 light1 718 light2 738 >> May 2017 light1 669 light2 686 >> >> 669 / 888 = 0.753378 >> 686 / 911 = 0.753019 >> >> Both lights decrease about the same >> How does this work out for half-life? >A semi-log plot and you should be able to fit a slope. >(There's always those dang factors of 2.303.. ln (10) > >Here's my plot... (not much of a curve to fit.. almost linear.) >https://www.dropbox.com/s/fb03x6ccjcxb6d3/JAN-P.BMP?dl=0 > >14 years? > >George H. Nice linear plot. Tritium has an official half-life of 12.32 years: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tritium There may also be other factors in play, like the [aging of the ?] fluorescent layer used in those tritium tubes. It does not matter for an FFT to find seasonal differences though. Once you learn more about current physics, followed a lecture last week on Higgs boson, Higgs field, it seems like most matter with mass (especially top-quark) has a positive charge (one exception, but small). This makes me wonder if negative charge forms a barrier for the Higgs field, say electrons are very light, so a barrier against mass, as Higgs field causes mass. IF that was so then we could reduce mass (of say a spacecraft) by enveloping it in electrons (or negative charge), but I am way out of my field here. Something for a MV negative charge generator and acceleration experiment. Probably a bogus idea, do not know enough about that stuff ATM.
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-16 07:57 +0000
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-05-16 07:04 -0700
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-16 14:39 +0000
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-16 14:48 +0000
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-05-16 08:28 -0700
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-16 16:42 +0000
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-05-16 10:01 -0700
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-16 19:05 +0000
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-18 16:28 +0000
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 12:51 -0400
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-05-18 12:27 -0700
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-18 19:44 +0000
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2017-05-18 16:46 -0500
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-19 19:03 +0000
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 17:58 -0400
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-20 07:05 +0000
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-20 04:13 -0400
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-05-20 09:23 -0700
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-20 20:55 +0000
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-05-18 12:25 -0700
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 20:04 -0400
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-18 21:07 -0700
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.really> - 2017-05-16 10:07 -0500
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-05-16 08:31 -0700
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available "tom" <tmiller11147@verizon.net> - 2017-05-16 11:58 -0400
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-05-16 09:51 -0700
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-16 19:06 +0000
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available krw@notreal.com - 2017-05-16 20:37 -0400
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-05-16 19:58 -0700
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-16 21:30 -0700
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available krw@notreal.com - 2017-05-16 20:37 -0400
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-05-16 13:03 -0400
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> - 2017-05-16 11:21 -0700
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2017-05-16 13:50 -0500
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2017-05-16 13:01 -0500
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-05-18 10:22 +0200
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-18 10:26 +0000
Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-16 16:28 +0000
csiph-web