Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #419170
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Einstein-Poincare synchronization procedure |
| Date | 2017-05-11 14:32 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <of2e85$1a1b$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <5b262fae-992c-4520-ae53-5f3240a82dc9@googlegroups.com> <oev3uq$1qk9$6@gioia.aioe.org> <57c290a7-1552-464d-bd41-41b896d20b86@googlegroups.com> <oev7ik$3t6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <enjoarFqi1uU1@mid.individual.net> |
On 5/11/17 1:20 PM, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am 10.05.2017 16:20, schrieb Jean-Pierre Framboise: >> mlwozniak wrote: >> >>> I don't care about your moronic Physics, unfortunately. >>> And, notice: - if the above is false - it's worthless - if the above is >>> true - it's worthless as well (for non-mathematical aproach). >>> Reassuming, >>> it's worthless in any case And, assuming the only worthy aproach is >>> mathematical aproach, >> >> You must be thinking math is something mystical. Quite the contrary. The >> Math is the simple bit. It is something we DO understand. Cats, are, what >> is complicated. What is it, those eyes, hair, moustache making up a >> cat? I >> have no idea. Let's be really clear, you look at a cat, but you have no >> idea. > > The problem isn't math, but a disease called 'mathematism'. > > If you perform mathematical tricks, without a reason to do so, you do > something sick. > > TH I'm not sure I know what you mean by "mathematical tricks". There are no mathematical tricks. There are lots of procedures in mathematics, like substitutions, moving things from one side to the other of an equation, dividing through by common numbers, taking limits, integrating, and so on... But these procedures are all individually both legitimized and understood. The end result is always producing something that is easily recognized and evaluated. But as long as the steps are individually sound, it doesn't matter which of them you take. It's very much like trying to cross a river, and you choose the next rock to jump on to help you get to the other side. First this rock, then this next one, then the next one, and so on. The objective isn't the rock, it's getting to the other side. Alternatively, you could take a different set of stones in a different sequence to do the same thing in the end. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Einstein-Poincare synchronization procedure mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-10 02:29 -0700
Re: Einstein-Poincare synchronization procedure Lissa Hermes <isussui@aeawwih.es> - 2017-05-10 13:18 +0000
Re: Einstein-Poincare synchronization procedure mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-10 07:00 -0700
Re: Einstein-Poincare synchronization procedure Jean-Pierre Framboise <nctedetne@ewmnwerwr.cn> - 2017-05-10 14:20 +0000
Re: Einstein-Poincare synchronization procedure mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-10 09:18 -0700
Re: Einstein-Poincare synchronization procedure Jean-Pierre Framboise <nctede@pmdcehr.cc> - 2017-05-10 16:28 +0000
Re: Einstein-Poincare synchronization procedure mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-10 10:12 -0700
Re: Einstein-Poincare synchronization procedure Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-05-11 20:20 +0200
Re: Einstein-Poincare synchronization procedure Jean-Pierre Framboise <nctede@pmdcehr.cc> - 2017-05-11 18:23 +0000
Re: Einstein-Poincare synchronization procedure JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-05-11 11:32 -0700
Re: Einstein-Poincare synchronization procedure Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-11 14:32 -0500
Re: Einstein-Poincare synchronization procedure mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-11 21:41 -0700
Re: Einstein-Poincare synchronization procedure Houchiko Inatsuki <uatci@swckskuwe.io> - 2017-05-12 13:38 +0000
Re: Einstein-Poincare synchronization procedure Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-05-15 11:34 +0200
Re: Einstein-Poincare synchronization procedure Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-15 07:54 -0500
Re: Einstein-Poincare synchronization procedure Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-05-17 13:27 +0200
Re: Einstein-Poincare synchronization procedure Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-17 11:04 -0500
Re: Einstein-Poincare synchronization procedure Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-05-17 18:28 +0200
Re: Einstein-Poincare synchronization procedure Houchiko Inatsuki <uatci@swckskuwe.io> - 2017-05-19 18:02 +0000
Re: Einstein-Poincare synchronization procedure JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-05-10 14:58 -0700
Re: Einstein-Poincare synchronization procedure mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-10 23:25 -0700
Re: Einstein-Poincare synchronization procedure JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-05-11 11:07 -0700
Re: Einstein-Poincare synchronization procedure Jean-Pierre Framboise <nctede@pmdcehr.cc> - 2017-05-11 18:15 +0000
csiph-web