Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #629287

Re: AP has no source for his claim that inner-reach stars gave birth to dark matter

Show all headers | View raw

Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:

>On Sunday, April 16, 2017 at 12:01:02 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>(snipped)
>> 
>> Nope. Vera Rubin, in the 1970s, noticed that the stars at the _edge_ of 
>> the Andromeda Galaxy were moving just as fast as ones near the center of
>> it, seemingly in violation of Newton's Laws of Motion. Her discovery was 
>> considered the first direct evidence of dark matter.

>Yet again I am correct "moving just as fast as ones near the center" is 
>called solid body rotation.

Nope.  The star velocity was discovered to be *constant*, meaning *no*
solid body rotation.  Solid body rotation would mean a star velocity
*proportional* to the distance from the center, like a record on a record
player.

>This is why MM needs a psychiatrist for his depression-- he twists 
>everything around, just to counter AP.

You keep projecting depression.  Does that really mean that you are 
depressed over failing at physics and projecting it on me?  That's
ok, if you go see a psychiatrist he can likely treat that and your
hallucination as well.

>If Vera Rubin said "Solid body rotation, means dark matter"

She didn't, of course.

> MM interprets that as meaning Outer Reach star means dark matter.

No, her interpretation of star velocity of the edge stars of Andromeda
(and other galaxies) and the inner velocities led to theorizing dark
matter.

>So, MM, you have no source, but making things up as you go.

You yourself stated losers at physics have to cite their claims.  So that
means you have to give a cite to your claim Rubin mentioned solid body
rotation when she discovered dark matter effects.

So where is your cite?

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Who taught MM-- outer parts of Spiral Galaxies needs explaining, not solid body. Was it  Randall, Hawking, Brown & Batygin, Baez, Weinberg, Tyson, Lederman, Higgs, Briane Greene Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 13:17 -0700
  Re: Who taught AP-- outer parts of Spiral Galaxies needs explaining, not solid body. Was it Randall, Hawking, Brown & Batygin, Baez, Weinberg, Tyson, Lederman, Higgs, Briane Greene moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-16 01:36 +0000
    can the MM failure of physics cite a source for his outer-reach-stars causing the dark matter fakery, Can he? Probably not Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 19:29 -0700
      Re: can the AP failure of physics cite a source for his core-stars causing the dark matter fakery, Can he? Probably not moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-16 05:01 +0000
        MM has no source for his claim that outer-reach stars gave birth to dark matter Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 22:14 -0700
          Getting the history of Dark Matter fakery correct Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 00:32 -0700
            Getting the history of Dark Matter fakery correct john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 05:57 -0700
              Getting the history of Dark Matter fakery correct john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 06:19 -0700
              yes, what did Rubin & Ford mean by edge? was it the R or the 1/R boundary Re: Getting the history of Dark Matter fakery correct Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 13:32 -0700
                When Rubin and Ford should have won a prize for galaxy rotations Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 00:38 -0700
                Panek gives a good overview of Rubin history Re: When Rubin and Ford should have won a prize for galaxy rotations Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 11:31 -0700
                Re: When Rubin and Ford should have won a prize for galaxy rotations moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-18 03:35 +0000
                MM injects Dark Matter when things move normally Re: When Rubin and Ford should have won a prize for galaxy rotations Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 21:05 -0700
                Re: MM injects Dark Matter when things move normally Re: When Rubin and Ford should have won a prize for galaxy rotations "F.Art.Ingatu" <F.Art.Ingatu@hotmail.com> - 2017-04-17 22:21 -0700
                Re: AP injects nutty thoughts on Dark Matter when things move abnormally Re: When Rubin and Ford should have won a prize for galaxy rotations moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-18 06:02 +0000
                Proof that Michael Moroney is a complete physics failure// little better than Porat, Odd, HVAC, Benj, but worse than Ed Prochak Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 23:12 -0700
                Solid body rotation as equal velocity of stars teaches a galactic spin Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-18 01:02 -0700
                Solid body rotation as equal velocity of stars teaches a galactic spin Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-18 01:38 -0700
                Angular velocity as magnetic monopoles do not exist in physics Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-18 10:45 -0700
                Re: Angular velocity as magnetic monopoles do not exist in physics "F.Art.Ingatu" <F.Art.Ingatu@hotmail.com> - 2017-04-18 13:06 -0700
                Angular velocity as magnetic monopoles do not exist in physics Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-18 14:46 -0700
                Re: Angular velocity as magnetic monopoles do not exist in physics "F.Art.Ingatu" <F.Art.Ingatu@hotmail.com> - 2017-04-18 17:19 -0700
                Re: Proof that Archimeded Plutonium is a complete physics failure// moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-18 13:29 +0000
              Re: Getting the history of Dark Matter fakery correct benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:02 -0400
            Re: Getting the history of Dark Matter fakery correct moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-16 17:06 +0000
          Re: AP has no source for his claim that inner-reach stars gave birth to dark matter moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-16 13:18 +0000
            Re: AP has no source for his claim that inner-reach stars gave birth to dark matter john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 08:30 -0700
              Re: AP has no source for his claim that inner-reach stars gave birth to dark matter moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-16 16:59 +0000
    Re: Who taught AP-- outer parts of Spiral Galaxies needs explaining, not solid body. Was it Randall, Hawking, Brown & Batygin, Baez, Weinberg, Tyson, Lederman, Higgs, Briane Greene john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 19:37 -0700
      Re: Who taught AP-- outer parts of Spiral Galaxies needs explaining, not solid body. Was it Randall, Hawking, Brown & Batygin, Baez, Weinberg, Tyson, Lederman, Higgs, Briane Greene john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 19:46 -0700
      Re: Who taught AP-- outer parts of Spiral Galaxies needs explaining, not solid body. Was it Randall, Hawking, Brown & Batygin, Baez, Weinberg, Tyson, Lederman, Higgs, Briane Greene moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-16 18:02 +0000

csiph-web