Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #629266

Re: can the AP failure of physics cite a source for his core-stars causing the dark matter fakery, Can he? Probably not

Show all headers | View raw

Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:

>On Saturday, April 15, 2017 at 8:36:40 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

>> Just correcting your mistake. You thought dark matter was theorized to
>> explain galactic cores, when it was first theorized to explain why the
>> stars at the outer reaches of galaxies don't orbit slower than the inner
>> ones (but still outside the luminous and apparently massive core), like
>> how Pluto orbits the sun much slower than Mercury.  Astronomers knew

>You need to cite an actual reference that says as much, for you are a 
>physcs failure

You're projecting again. Does it really bother you that much that you are
a physics failure so you have to project your failure on others?

> and nothing you say is worth accepting unless you cite what others 
>(not failures of physics) wrote on the topic.

Go fetch your own rocks.  You didn't even give an actual cite yourself.

>Being a physics failure,

So you finally admit to your failure at physics?

>Vera Rubin, to cite my source, was one of the first, early on astronomers 
>who noticed that spiral galaxies star near the core did Solid Body 
>Rotation, and her explanation for solid body rotation was dark matter.

Nope. Vera Rubin, in the 1970s, noticed that the stars at the _edge_ of 
the Andromeda Galaxy were moving just as fast as ones near the center of
it, seemingly in violation of Newton's Laws of Motion. Her discovery was 
considered the first direct evidence of dark matter.

And you didn't even give an actual cite.

Now, will you realize your mistake or just bluster on some more?

[insert AP's bluster here]

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Who taught MM-- outer parts of Spiral Galaxies needs explaining, not solid body. Was it  Randall, Hawking, Brown & Batygin, Baez, Weinberg, Tyson, Lederman, Higgs, Briane Greene Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 13:17 -0700
  Re: Who taught AP-- outer parts of Spiral Galaxies needs explaining, not solid body. Was it Randall, Hawking, Brown & Batygin, Baez, Weinberg, Tyson, Lederman, Higgs, Briane Greene moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-16 01:36 +0000
    can the MM failure of physics cite a source for his outer-reach-stars causing the dark matter fakery, Can he? Probably not Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 19:29 -0700
      Re: can the AP failure of physics cite a source for his core-stars causing the dark matter fakery, Can he? Probably not moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-16 05:01 +0000
        MM has no source for his claim that outer-reach stars gave birth to dark matter Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 22:14 -0700
          Getting the history of Dark Matter fakery correct Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 00:32 -0700
            Getting the history of Dark Matter fakery correct john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 05:57 -0700
              Getting the history of Dark Matter fakery correct john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 06:19 -0700
              yes, what did Rubin & Ford mean by edge? was it the R or the 1/R boundary Re: Getting the history of Dark Matter fakery correct Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 13:32 -0700
                When Rubin and Ford should have won a prize for galaxy rotations Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 00:38 -0700
                Panek gives a good overview of Rubin history Re: When Rubin and Ford should have won a prize for galaxy rotations Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 11:31 -0700
                Re: When Rubin and Ford should have won a prize for galaxy rotations moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-18 03:35 +0000
                MM injects Dark Matter when things move normally Re: When Rubin and Ford should have won a prize for galaxy rotations Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 21:05 -0700
                Re: MM injects Dark Matter when things move normally Re: When Rubin and Ford should have won a prize for galaxy rotations "F.Art.Ingatu" <F.Art.Ingatu@hotmail.com> - 2017-04-17 22:21 -0700
                Re: AP injects nutty thoughts on Dark Matter when things move abnormally Re: When Rubin and Ford should have won a prize for galaxy rotations moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-18 06:02 +0000
                Proof that Michael Moroney is a complete physics failure// little better than Porat, Odd, HVAC, Benj, but worse than Ed Prochak Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 23:12 -0700
                Solid body rotation as equal velocity of stars teaches a galactic spin Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-18 01:02 -0700
                Solid body rotation as equal velocity of stars teaches a galactic spin Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-18 01:38 -0700
                Angular velocity as magnetic monopoles do not exist in physics Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-18 10:45 -0700
                Re: Angular velocity as magnetic monopoles do not exist in physics "F.Art.Ingatu" <F.Art.Ingatu@hotmail.com> - 2017-04-18 13:06 -0700
                Angular velocity as magnetic monopoles do not exist in physics Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-18 14:46 -0700
                Re: Angular velocity as magnetic monopoles do not exist in physics "F.Art.Ingatu" <F.Art.Ingatu@hotmail.com> - 2017-04-18 17:19 -0700
                Re: Proof that Archimeded Plutonium is a complete physics failure// moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-18 13:29 +0000
              Re: Getting the history of Dark Matter fakery correct benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:02 -0400
            Re: Getting the history of Dark Matter fakery correct moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-16 17:06 +0000
          Re: AP has no source for his claim that inner-reach stars gave birth to dark matter moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-16 13:18 +0000
            Re: AP has no source for his claim that inner-reach stars gave birth to dark matter john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 08:30 -0700
              Re: AP has no source for his claim that inner-reach stars gave birth to dark matter moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-16 16:59 +0000
    Re: Who taught AP-- outer parts of Spiral Galaxies needs explaining, not solid body. Was it Randall, Hawking, Brown & Batygin, Baez, Weinberg, Tyson, Lederman, Higgs, Briane Greene john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 19:37 -0700
      Re: Who taught AP-- outer parts of Spiral Galaxies needs explaining, not solid body. Was it Randall, Hawking, Brown & Batygin, Baez, Weinberg, Tyson, Lederman, Higgs, Briane Greene john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 19:46 -0700
      Re: Who taught AP-- outer parts of Spiral Galaxies needs explaining, not solid body. Was it Randall, Hawking, Brown & Batygin, Baez, Weinberg, Tyson, Lederman, Higgs, Briane Greene moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-16 18:02 +0000

csiph-web