Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #454447
| From | Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: Identification of modules |
| Date | 2017-03-31 11:55 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <obm8gp$9do$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <obl01o$8a8$1@node2.news.atman.pl> <obl40f$c7m$1@dont-email.me> <obl4en$o4b$1@node1.news.atman.pl> <obl6ki$k80$1@dont-email.me> <obl84f$fve$1@node2.news.atman.pl> |
On 3/31/2017 2:39 AM, Piotr Wyderski wrote: > Don Y wrote: > >> So, you're planning on discarding the EEPROM in the DS2438? > > Yes, not going to use it at all. > >> (Make sure the configuration isn't implemented in EEPROM if you mistrust it!) > > The problem is not in EEPROM, but the lack of power > supply/communitation in the case of spare modules. > The powered ones can be automatically reprogrammed > once a year, just in case. So, you're assuming the EEPROM contents will remain intact between times that you get a chance to "examine" it. Note that there are no CRC's on the configuration so if a bit toggles, you'll have no way of knowing that the configuration has changed and will gleefully "refresh" it to its erroneous state. [Unless you leverage the discarded EEPROM store to keep a highly redundant copy of that information] >> Why not just opt for a one-wire ADC? > > Where, on the module? It's exactly how 2438 is going to be used. Same way as yours is used. I'm just eliding the "charge accumulator", voltage/current monitoring, etc. that makes the 2438 so "special". >> Or, some discrete logic that you clock, remotely? > > Too big. Masked FPGA/PAL/etc.? >> (presumably, you have some time to query the system's >> configuration -- you're not trying to hot swap cards >> and bring them on-line "instantly"?) > > Yes, no hot-swap capability required. > >> So, you're prepared to do an end-of-life buy as you head >> into initial production? > > I can add a spare DS2438 in a bag for every produced module. That seems like you're planning for failure -- instead of planning for *success*! >> What about masked parts? > > The scale is far to small, can't afford. Can't argue with that! :>
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Identification of modules Piotr Wyderski <peter.pan@neverland.mil> - 2017-03-31 09:21 +0200
Re: Identification of modules Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-03-31 01:31 -0700
Re: Identification of modules Piotr Wyderski <peter.pan@neverland.mil> - 2017-03-31 10:36 +0200
Re: Identification of modules Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-03-31 02:16 -0700
Re: Identification of modules Piotr Wyderski <peter.pan@neverland.mil> - 2017-03-31 11:39 +0200
Re: Identification of modules Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2017-03-31 11:32 +0100
Re: Identification of modules Piotr Wyderski <peter.pan@neverland.mil> - 2017-03-31 12:59 +0200
Re: Identification of modules Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-03-31 11:55 -0700
Re: Identification of modules Piotr Wyderski <peter.pan@neverland.mil> - 2017-03-31 11:30 +0200
Re: Identification of modules rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 05:20 -0400
Re: Identification of modules Piotr Wyderski <peter.pan@neverland.mil> - 2017-03-31 11:53 +0200
Re: Identification of modules rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 06:16 -0400
Re: Identification of modules Piotr Wyderski <peter.pan@neverland.mil> - 2017-03-31 12:39 +0200
Re: Identification of modules rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 13:27 -0400
Re: Identification of modules Piotr Wyderski <peter.pan@neverland.mil> - 2017-03-31 22:14 +0200
Re: Identification of modules rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 17:48 -0400
Re: Identification of modules Piotr Wyderski <peter.pan@neverland.mil> - 2017-04-03 10:57 +0200
Re: Identification of modules John Devereux <john@devereux.me.uk> - 2017-03-31 11:39 +0100
Re: Identification of modules rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 13:38 -0400
Re: Identification of modules Piotr Wyderski <peter.pan@neverland.mil> - 2017-03-31 22:21 +0200
Re: Identification of modules Joe Chisolm <jchisolm6@earthlink.net> - 2017-03-31 13:02 -0500
Re: Identification of modules Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2017-03-31 16:18 -0500
csiph-web