Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #26126
| From | Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded |
| Subject | Re: Automotive Software and the Law |
| Date | 2017-03-17 19:00 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <oahsub$m1b$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <2CeyA.329251$F83.232172@fx38.am4> <aMydnToHzfkP51TFnZ2dnUU7-b-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <oac29c$o6q$1@gioia.aioe.org> <oagesq$d1t$2@dont-email.me> <5P2dnRmRIeI3mlHFnZ2dnUU7-WudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Tim Wescott wrote: > On Fri, 17 Mar 2017 05:54:43 -0500, Les Cargill wrote: > >> John Speth wrote: >>>> Actually by "law" I mean "law". Are there regulations in any >>>> country or other polity that require companies manufacturing or >>>> selling automobiles to adhere to the standard before they can >>>> legally sell their wares? Is there anywhere in the world where >>>> not following ISO 26262 will have a cop or a government lawyer >>>> knocking on your door? Is there anywhere in the world where, >>>> before you can offer a newly-designed car for sale, you have to >>>> show documentation that proves that you've followed the >>>> standard, or regulations based on the standard? >>> >>> Here's a cynical response: No, no, and no; not until somebody is >>> killed. >>> >>> Straying off topic, I personally believe that lack of gov >>> regulation is the single biggest weakness of the technology. >>> Imagine what will happen when a steering wheel free car is >>> involved in a fatal crash. The entire fleet will be grounded. >>> >>> >> There have been fatalities already when the car was on >> "autopilot". > > I've seen claims that, statistically, the self-driving cars are > safer, but generate more news in a crash. Hence, since they're a new > thing, they get tarred and feathered. > Yep. And in the larger sense, crashes will be analyzed and fed back into various code bases. This could play the role that the NTSB plays in aviation ... mishaps. > Dunno what truth is, but it certainly seems plausible. > Statistical arguments are like that. -- Les Cargill
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Automotive Software and the Law Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2017-03-14 18:27 -0500
Re: Automotive Software and the Law Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2017-03-14 20:18 -0400
Re: Automotive Software and the Law HT-Lab <hans64@htminuslab.com> - 2017-03-15 11:18 +0000
Re: Automotive Software and the Law Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2017-03-15 11:36 -0500
Re: Automotive Software and the Law HT-Lab <hans64@htminuslab.com> - 2017-03-15 17:12 +0000
Re: Automotive Software and the Law Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2017-03-15 12:32 -0500
Re: Automotive Software and the Law John Speth <johnspeth@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-15 11:48 -0700
Re: Automotive Software and the Law Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2017-03-15 17:31 -0500
Re: Automotive Software and the Law Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2017-03-15 19:23 -0400
Re: Automotive Software and the Law Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2017-03-15 18:41 -0500
Re: Automotive Software and the Law Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2017-03-17 05:54 -0500
Re: Automotive Software and the Law Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2017-03-17 11:42 +0000
Re: Automotive Software and the Law Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2017-03-17 07:08 -0500
Re: Automotive Software and the Law Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2017-03-17 13:50 +0000
Re: Automotive Software and the Law Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2017-03-17 10:58 -0500
Re: Automotive Software and the Law Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2017-03-17 16:18 +0000
Re: Automotive Software and the Law Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2017-03-17 19:00 -0500
Re: Automotive Software and the Law Jacob Sparre Andersen <jacob@jacob-sparre.dk> - 2017-03-15 22:01 +0100
Re: Automotive Software and the Law Stefan Reuther <stefan.news@arcor.de> - 2017-03-16 11:09 +0100
Re: Automotive Software and the Law Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2017-03-16 10:16 -0500
Re: Automotive Software and the Law Stefan Reuther <stefan.news@arcor.de> - 2017-03-17 12:10 +0100
Re: Automotive Software and the Law Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2017-03-17 07:12 -0500
Re: Automotive Software and the Law Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2017-03-17 11:00 -0500
Re: Automotive Software and the Law Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2017-03-17 14:49 +0000
Re: Automotive Software and the Law Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2017-03-17 05:52 -0500
Re: Automotive Software and the Law Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2017-03-17 11:03 -0500
csiph-web