Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #453042

Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause?

Newsgroups rec.arts.sf.written
From djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt)
Subject Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause?
Message-ID <oEKrot.Aqx@kithrup.com> (permalink)
Date 2016-10-05 12:50 +0000
References <a9cd7bad-67d1-4520-bbd7-3207757ab238@googlegroups.com> <oEJs1n.3IH@kithrup.com> <cfgynrn3ofn5$.1oadcuq92x13z$.dlg@40tude.net> <86wphnnvyy.fsf@gaheris.avalon.lan>
Organization Kithrup Enterprises, Ld.

Show all headers | View raw


In article <86wphnnvyy.fsf@gaheris.avalon.lan>,
Mart van de Wege  <mvdwege@gmail.com> wrote:
>"Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> writes:
>
>> On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 00:00:59 GMT, Dorothy J Heydt
>> <djheydt@kithrup.com> wrote in<news:oEJs1n.3IH@kithrup.com>
>> in rec.arts.sf.written:
>>
>>> (Because I want to keep my fingers on the keyboard, silly
>>> Applehead.)
>>
>> I’ve a strong preference in that direction myself.  That’s
>> one reason that I like my email client: even though it has
>> a nice GUI, one that I like, I can still do everything from
>> the keyboard.  It also has quite a nice little text editor,
>> so I use it for keeping notes to myself, stored in its
>> Outbox.  I’ve yet to find a Linux client that is as nice.
>>
>Well, if you can stand the weirdness of Emacs, Gnus sounds like a decent
>client for you to try.

I have never even attempted to use emacs; UCB was a vi shop.
>
>Unless you are dependent on being able to read lots of HTML mail. Emacs
>can do a lot, but its HTML renderer is still stuck in the early
>nineties.

I assume that any mail I get on kithrup that's encoded in HTML is
spam, and I delete it.

I am now proofing the HTML'ed version of _The Interior Life,
painstakingly encoded by Bill Gill, and we might actually see it
online before year's end.  But I'm using Calibre, which doesn't
show the HTML at all; I'm taking notes on (very few by now)
corrections needed, and Bill will correct them.  I can look at a
(short) coded text in vi, but the meaning of all those weird
instructions in brackets mystify me.  I am seventy-four and
probably too old to learn those new tricks.

-- 
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com

Back to rec.arts.sf.written | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Madawc Williams <madawcnow@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 00:56 -0700
  Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-10-03 13:17 +0000
    Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 07:21 -0700
      Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? David Johnston <Davidjohnston29@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-03 11:37 -0600
        Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? David Johnston <Davidjohnston29@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-03 11:40 -0600
  Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 11:37 -0700
    Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-10-03 13:13 -0700
      Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-10-03 20:50 +0000
        Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 14:52 -0700
          Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 17:18 -0700
            Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-10-04 00:54 +0000
            Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-10-04 05:09 -0400
              Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-10-04 12:45 +0000
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> - 2016-10-04 12:32 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-10-05 00:00 +0000
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-10-04 21:17 -0400
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-10-05 02:09 +0000
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-10-04 22:55 -0400
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-10-04 20:21 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-10-04 23:39 -0400
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-10-05 05:23 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-10-05 05:29 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-10-05 12:44 -0400
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-10-05 11:06 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-10-05 14:52 -0400
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-10-12 11:42 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-10-05 12:44 +0000
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-10-05 08:30 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-10-05 15:48 +0000
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-10-05 11:12 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Joe Bernstein <joe@sfbooks.com> - 2016-10-05 10:14 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-10-05 15:18 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-10-05 15:30 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Joe Bernstein <joe@sfbooks.com> - 2016-10-06 08:46 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-10-06 09:37 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-10-06 16:31 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> - 2016-10-08 14:15 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Mart van de Wege <mvdwege@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 08:36 +0200
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-10-05 12:50 +0000
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-05 21:50 -0500
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-10-06 03:27 +0000
          Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-10-04 00:51 +0000
      Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 16:57 -0700
        Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-04 12:40 -0500
          Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 21:27 -0700
            Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-10-05 03:04 -0400
              Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 01:19 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Juho Julkunen <giaotanj@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-05 15:04 +0300
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-10-05 12:55 +0000
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Juho Julkunen <giaotanj@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-05 22:58 +0300
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-10-05 13:08 -0400
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Robert Woodward <robertaw@drizzle.com> - 2016-10-05 10:13 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-10-05 14:40 -0400
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-10-05 18:59 +0000
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-10-05 15:30 -0400
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Juho Julkunen <giaotanj@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-05 23:07 +0300
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 16:12 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Juho Julkunen <giaotanj@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-06 02:33 +0300
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 16:45 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-10-06 02:03 +0000
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 06:36 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-10-06 19:36 +0000
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Jaimie Vandenbergh <jaimie@sometimes.sessile.org> - 2016-10-09 22:51 +0100
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 16:43 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-05 21:44 -0500
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-10-05 23:23 -0400
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-10-07 14:33 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-06 08:03 -0500
              Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-10-05 12:53 +0000
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-05 21:49 -0500
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-10-05 23:25 -0400
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? "Gary R. Schmidt" <grschmidt@acm.org> - 2016-10-06 18:08 +1100
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-10-07 05:41 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 13:01 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-07 20:03 -0500
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2016-10-08 03:28 +0000
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-10-07 18:33 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? "Gary R. Schmidt" <grschmidt@acm.org> - 2016-10-28 00:10 +1100
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-10-06 21:13 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-10-07 04:55 +0000
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-10-07 14:32 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Jaimie Vandenbergh <jaimie@sometimes.sessile.org> - 2016-10-09 23:06 +0100
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-10-09 21:34 -0700
                Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Jaimie Vandenbergh <jaimie@sometimes.sessile.org> - 2016-10-10 09:15 +0100
              Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-10-05 10:21 -0400
  Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? peterwezeman@hotmail.com - 2016-10-03 20:51 -0700
    Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2016-10-04 04:19 +0000
    Re: Was Naomi Mitchison the first person in science fiction to say that interfering in non-human cultures would be wrong even if there was good cause? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-10-04 07:40 -0700

csiph-web