Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #409105

Re: The constancy of light

Show all headers | View raw

On 10.02.2017 16:48, matt.rush200@outlook.com wrote:
> Paul B Andersen wrote
>> When we use light, the interference pattern will usually appear
>> almost immediately after the light is switch on. That is because
>> the number of photons is so vast that the interference pattern
>> will appear to be continuous. But if the light is emitted photon
>> by photon, then points will first appear seemingly at random
>> positions on the detector (CCD). But after a while the
>> interference pattern will build up. So it is quite obvious that
>> the inference pattern must show the probability for where the
>> photons will hit.
>> We know that this pattern is as predicted by Maxwell's theory,
>
> The same can be done with waves where the atom quantises the
> input radiation.
> Assuming all atoms in the detector absorb a steady input of wave
> radiation over time and release it at set quantised amounts
> equivalent to one 'photon' to the circuit. And all atoms start at
> different filled amounts, then where there is even intensity
> incident light but no pattern on the detector plane all atoms will
> fill and release at different times in random dots to the screen.
>
> Where an interference pattern of light is incident on the detector
> plane this will always give more incident radiation to the brighter
> stripes of the pattern areas of the detector. Hence although the
> overall fill and release of dots on the whole screen will still be
> random. Over time more dots will appear in the brighter stripe areas.
>
> One can even do this with a simple number experiment. Divide
> a square into 100 squares 10x10 equally. And set each square at a
> random value between 0-9. Have each square fill to 10 units and
> then release a 'dot'. (photon=10)Now have a sequence of
> events where you simulate wave light incident on the square.
> Each 'event' has one unit added to each square.
> Over time you get a random dot appearing somewhere on the
> screen. Reduce the amount each square gets each event,
> and the random dots will appear less frequently. Apply a pattern
> to the squares where every second column gets twice the amount.
> ( to simulate the interference stripes)
> Then a striped pattern to the random dots will emerge over time.

I have a hard time believing that you are serious.
But having read your other postings, I manage. Just! :-D

BTW, how do you explain that the double slit experiment
with electrons form interference patterns?
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/15/3/033018/pdf

Is it because electrons really are waves and not particles?

-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The constancy of light Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2017-02-06 17:11 -0800
  Cretin Peter Riedt at it again "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-02-06 17:16 -0800
    Re: Cretin Peter Riedt at it again, was re: constancy of light RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-13 12:38 -0800
  Re: The constancy of light Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-02-07 12:25 +1100
    Re: The constancy of light Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2017-02-06 20:26 -0800
      Peter Riedt eats shit "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-02-06 20:36 -0800
      Re: The constancy of light Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 06:56 +0100
      Re: The constancy of light Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-02-07 19:31 +1100
        Re: The constancy of light "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-07 00:39 -0800
        Re: The constancy of light benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-07 17:07 -0500
      Re: The constancy of light Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 07:22 -0600
        Re: The constancy of light Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2017-02-07 16:02 -0800
          Re: The constancy of light Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-07 17:11 -0800
            Re: The constancy of light Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2017-02-07 18:16 -0800
              Re: The constancy of light Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-07 18:31 -0800
              Re: The constancy of light Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 08:33 -0600
                Re: The constancy of light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-02-08 06:53 -0800
          Re: The constancy of light Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 08:32 -0600
    Re: The constancy of light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-02-07 10:36 -0800
    Re: The constancy of light matt.rush200@outlook.com - 2017-02-08 05:07 -0800
      Re: The constancy of light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-02-08 05:25 -0800
        Re: The constancy of light matt.rush200@outlook.com - 2017-02-08 05:59 -0800
          Re: The constancy of light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-02-08 06:14 -0800
          Re: The constancy of light Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 21:15 +0100
            Re: The constancy of light matt.rush200@outlook.com - 2017-02-09 03:44 -0800
              Re: The constancy of light Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 13:36 +0100
                Re: The constancy of light matt.rush200@outlook.com - 2017-02-09 04:51 -0800
                Re: The constancy of light Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-09 05:36 -0800
                Re: The constancy of light Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 15:12 +0100
                Re: The constancy of light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-02-09 08:52 -0600
                Re: The constancy of light matt.rush200@outlook.com - 2017-02-09 10:20 -0800
                Imbecile Jay Mosley back with a vengeance "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-02-09 10:44 -0800
                Re: The constancy of light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-02-13 10:16 -0600
                Re: The constancy of light Sanjuanita Peeples <naalu@nwmeela.org> - 2017-02-13 18:32 +0000
                Re: The constancy of light matt.rush200@outlook.com - 2017-02-13 11:01 -0800
                Re: The constancy of light alsor@interia.pl - 2017-02-10 12:49 -0800
              Re: The constancy of light "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-02-10 14:47 +0100
                Re: The constancy of light matt.rush200@outlook.com - 2017-02-10 07:48 -0800
                Re: The constancy of light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-02-13 10:34 -0600
                Re: The constancy of light matt.rush200@outlook.com - 2017-02-13 10:34 -0800
                Re: The constancy of light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-02-13 14:16 -0600
                Re: The constancy of light matt.rush200@outlook.com - 2017-02-13 14:31 -0800
                Re: The constancy of light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-02-14 09:33 -0600
                Re: The constancy of light matt.rush200@outlook.com - 2017-02-14 08:18 -0800
                Re: The constancy of light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-02-14 12:24 -0600
                Re: The constancy of light matt.rush200@outlook.com - 2017-02-14 10:40 -0800
                Re: The constancy of light "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-02-13 21:16 +0100
      Re: The constancy of light Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 21:00 +0100
  Re: The constancy of light numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-07 14:59 -0800
    Re: The constancy of light John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-07 15:51 -0800
    Re: The constancy of light John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-07 17:06 -0800
      Re: The constancy of light John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-07 17:09 -0800
      Re: The constancy of light Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-02-08 12:53 +1100
        Re: The constancy of light John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-07 18:19 -0800
          Re: The constancy of light Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-02-08 14:08 +1100
        Re: The constancy of light John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-07 18:24 -0800
          Re: The constancy of light Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-02-08 14:11 +1100
  Re: The constancy of light numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 11:24 -0800
    Re: The constancy of light "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-08 12:10 -0800
    Re: The constancy of light Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-02-09 12:45 +1100
  Re: The constancy of light numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-09 10:36 -0800
  Re: The constancy of light numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-10 12:57 -0800
    Re: The constancy of light John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-10 14:56 -0800
    Re: The constancy of light alsor@interia.pl - 2017-02-11 14:42 -0800
  Re: The constancy of light numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-10 13:09 -0800
  Re: The constancy of light numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-10 13:23 -0800
  Re: The constancy of light numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-10 13:27 -0800
  Re: The constancy of light numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-11 11:23 -0800
  Re: The constancy of light numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-11 14:56 -0800
  Re: The constancy of light numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-14 10:44 -0800

csiph-web