Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #617657

Re: Van Allen radiation belt

From Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Van Allen radiation belt
Date 2017-02-08 19:01 -0600
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <o7gf0g$11ei$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <74074707-1a4a-4431-bf36-517e612cb96a@googlegroups.com> <ccac59fd-7adb-44da-bd62-ae3d8d5667ef@googlegroups.com> <du5smd-kb8.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <o7g8gf$opd$1@gioia.aioe.org> <a8d467eb-5acf-4d9d-ac16-53e45de82c36@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 2/8/2017 6:53 PM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 8, 2017 at 3:10:13 PM UTC-8, Serg Io wrote:
>
>> cosmic rays have the nucli of an atom, speeding along.
>> not like a gamma which is pure EM.
>
> Here are 4 explanations of gamma rays and cosmic rays...
>
> https://www.quora.com/Whats-the-difference-between-cosmic-rays-and-gamma-ray-bursts-What-specific-particle-can-we-detect-on-earth-for-each-one
>

some additional

with Gamma you get 2,
gamma's are always produced in pairs (some medical devices based upon 
this fact)

gamma rays travel in stright lines, so they can build gamma telescopes 
and see where they came from  (perhaps gav lensing could distort)

Cosmic rays do not travel in stright lines, Mag fields change path, one 
cant tell where they are from.


anyhow you can detect both with a PMT and scintillation plastic bought 
off eBay for about $200 or less (you need a scope, can get a mini for 
about $50 too)

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-04 15:54 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-04 15:58 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-05 00:19 +0000
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 01:22 -0800
      Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-08 18:51 +0000
        Re: Van Allen radiation belt Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-08 17:10 -0600
          Re: Van Allen radiation belt pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 16:53 -0800
            Re: Van Allen radiation belt Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-08 19:01 -0600
              Re: Van Allen radiation belt pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 17:20 -0800
                Re: Van Allen radiation belt Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-09 12:04 -0600
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-04 16:05 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-08 08:13 -0600
      Re: Van Allen radiation belt noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 09:45 -0800
        Re: Van Allen radiation belt Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-08 17:12 -0600
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-04 16:10 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-05 00:25 +0000
      Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-04 20:52 -0500
        Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-05 03:15 +0000
          Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-06 16:50 -0500
            Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-06 23:51 +0000
              Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-06 19:48 -0500
                Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-07 01:41 +0000
                Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-07 16:30 -0500
                Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-07 21:48 +0000
                Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-07 20:52 -0500
                Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-08 03:51 +0000
                Re: Van Allen radiation belt noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 21:33 -0800
                Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-08 16:58 -0500
                Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-08 22:08 +0000
      Re: Van Allen radiation belt Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-08 19:02 -0600
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 01:24 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-05 00:22 +0000
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-04 20:50 -0500
      Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-05 03:17 +0000
        Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-06 16:50 -0500
          Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-06 23:52 +0000
            Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-06 19:48 -0500
              Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-07 01:42 +0000
                Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-07 16:30 -0500
                Re: Van Allen radiation belt Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-09 11:59 -0600
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-04 20:22 -0500
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-02-04 18:28 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 12:37 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-05 20:49 +0000
    or, PI < 10/31 in some base_n > 3 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-05 14:36 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 14:07 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 14:33 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 15:04 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 15:05 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 15:51 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 15:52 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 15:54 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 15:55 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 15:56 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 08:47 -0800
      waves are wavey noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 16:02 -0800
        Re: waves are wavey noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 19:05 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 15:57 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 14:02 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 01:20 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 01:21 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 12:14 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 12:28 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 13:41 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-09 11:19 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 10:45 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 10:47 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 10:52 -0800
      Re: Van Allen radiation belt "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-02-11 12:56 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-11 11:36 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 13:10 -0800
      Re: Van Allen radiation belt "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-02-11 16:32 -0800
      Re: Van Allen radiation belt Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-02-12 13:43 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 08:58 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-12 13:46 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-13 13:13 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-02-13 13:59 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-02-13 14:34 -0800
      Re: Van Allen radiation belt "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-02-13 15:55 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-14 09:57 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 10:06 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-14 10:41 -0800

csiph-web