Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #617512

Re: Van Allen radiation belt

From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Van Allen radiation belt
Date 2017-02-08 03:51 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <i6hqmd-vm2.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <58991955$0$10699$c3e8da3$5d8fb80f@news.astraweb.com> <77lnmd-4hm.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <589a3c80$0$57736$c3e8da3$5e5e430d@news.astraweb.com> <utrpmd-ui.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <589a79d4$0$57907$c3e8da3$c8b7d2e6@news.astraweb.com>

Show all headers | View raw

benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 2/7/2017 4:48 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 2/6/2017 8:41 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 2/6/2017 6:51 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/4/2017 10:15 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/4/2017 7:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> numbernumber1964@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> The Mars mission may also be fake since it may not be possible to use
>>>>>>>>>>> radio waves at the distance of 33 millions of miles since radio
>>>>>>>>>>> waves are dependent on the inverse of the fifth power.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> How are the pictures getting back from all of the Mars probes and
>>>>>>>>>> rovers genius?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That's the point chimporoni, they can't get back hence must be hoaxes.
>>>>>>>>> You've often argued this kind of thing yourself.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Typical troll nonsense and ad hominem.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is no point in attempting to discuss anything with an admitted
>>>>>> troll liar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth.
>>>>
>>>> Again, what would be the point of attempting to discuss anything with
>>>> ad admitted troll liar?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth.
>>
>> The troll seems desperate for attention.
>>
>>
> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth.

The troll desperately seeks attention.
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-04 15:54 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-04 15:58 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-05 00:19 +0000
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 01:22 -0800
      Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-08 18:51 +0000
        Re: Van Allen radiation belt Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-08 17:10 -0600
          Re: Van Allen radiation belt pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 16:53 -0800
            Re: Van Allen radiation belt Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-08 19:01 -0600
              Re: Van Allen radiation belt pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 17:20 -0800
                Re: Van Allen radiation belt Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-09 12:04 -0600
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-04 16:05 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-08 08:13 -0600
      Re: Van Allen radiation belt noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 09:45 -0800
        Re: Van Allen radiation belt Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-08 17:12 -0600
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-04 16:10 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-05 00:25 +0000
      Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-04 20:52 -0500
        Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-05 03:15 +0000
          Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-06 16:50 -0500
            Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-06 23:51 +0000
              Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-06 19:48 -0500
                Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-07 01:41 +0000
                Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-07 16:30 -0500
                Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-07 21:48 +0000
                Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-07 20:52 -0500
                Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-08 03:51 +0000
                Re: Van Allen radiation belt noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 21:33 -0800
                Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-08 16:58 -0500
                Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-08 22:08 +0000
      Re: Van Allen radiation belt Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-08 19:02 -0600
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 01:24 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-05 00:22 +0000
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-04 20:50 -0500
      Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-05 03:17 +0000
        Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-06 16:50 -0500
          Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-06 23:52 +0000
            Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-06 19:48 -0500
              Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-07 01:42 +0000
                Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-07 16:30 -0500
                Re: Van Allen radiation belt Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-09 11:59 -0600
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-04 20:22 -0500
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-02-04 18:28 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 12:37 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-05 20:49 +0000
    or, PI < 10/31 in some base_n > 3 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-05 14:36 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 14:07 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 14:33 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 15:04 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 15:05 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 15:51 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 15:52 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 15:54 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 15:55 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 15:56 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 08:47 -0800
      waves are wavey noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 16:02 -0800
        Re: waves are wavey noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 19:05 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 15:57 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 14:02 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 01:20 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 01:21 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 12:14 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 12:28 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 13:41 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-09 11:19 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 10:45 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 10:47 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 10:52 -0800
      Re: Van Allen radiation belt "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-02-11 12:56 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-11 11:36 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 13:10 -0800
      Re: Van Allen radiation belt "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-02-11 16:32 -0800
      Re: Van Allen radiation belt Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-02-12 13:43 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 08:58 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-12 13:46 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-13 13:13 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-02-13 13:59 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-02-13 14:34 -0800
      Re: Van Allen radiation belt "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-02-13 15:55 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-14 09:57 -0800
    Re: Van Allen radiation belt noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 10:06 -0800
  Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-14 10:41 -0800

csiph-web