Re: 'Amalgamated' source code

From	Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: 'Amalgamated' source code
Date	2017-01-10 06:55 -0600
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<o52lds$mnr$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<o4gf2a$bl9$1@dont-email.me> <slrno6q8o3.5q5.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> <587438cb.362765@news.xs4all.nl>

Show all headers | View raw

Richard Bos wrote:
> Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> wrote:
>
>> It doesn't make sense to me, at all.  The problem of building a C
>> program from N source files was solved by make, 40 years ago.  My best
>> guess is it's some kind of problem endemic to Windows (which I don't
>> write code for, but I understand it's not very C-friendly).
>
> Understand again. I program on Windows, and I have no problem solving
> this problem using a decent implementation. In fact, I had no problem
> with this back in the MS-DOS days.
>
> I know, I know, how dare he imply that anything but GNU/HURL is good for
> anything at all, and Windoze is not the absolute pit of despair and
> completely unusable for anything but Visual Basic. Sorry to shatter your
> life's foundation, but get over it already: you _can_ program in C on
> Windows, it is _not_ a deep-rooted problem with the OS, and Bart and
> Malcolm's problems are _not_ typical. To me, they sound more like your
> typical Leenux Weenies than like proper, professional Windows C
> developers.
>
> Richard
>

It's late in this thread to charge in, but....

1) the Unix command line tools for work in a DOS window
exist.

2) Mingw provides a port of GCC that also works in a DOS
window. Some things are missing.

3) VisualStudio is not *actual* C programming; it is a
C like language that sits on top of various Windows ... VM
abstractions. So it's quite close, but you have to be careful
about those VM abstractions.

FWIW, neither is inherently superior to the other. They're
just different. But at a certain level, there really
are things that expose deep-rooted differences in Windows
that can be most precisely enunciated as problems of the
"cahn't get theah from heah" sort.

-- 
Les Cargill

Thread

'Amalgamated' source code BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-03 15:14 +0000
  Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 08:47 -0800
    Re: 'Amalgamated' source code BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-03 19:47 +0000
      Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 12:48 -0800
        Re: 'Amalgamated' source code BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-03 21:36 +0000
          Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 16:01 -0800
            Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-01-03 16:26 -0800
              Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 18:00 -0800
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-04 03:34 +0000
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 03:31 -0800
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-04 12:03 +0000
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 05:00 -0800
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-01-05 02:38 -0800
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-05 14:28 +0000
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-01-05 08:20 -0800
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-05 17:05 +0000
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-01-05 10:11 -0800
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-05 19:46 +0000
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-01-05 12:15 -0800
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-05 21:54 +0000
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-05 17:40 +0000
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-05 19:33 +0000
            Re: 'Amalgamated' source code BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-04 10:53 +0000
          Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-04 01:51 +0000
        Re: 'Amalgamated' source code BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-04 11:54 +0000
          Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 05:57 -0800
            Re: 'Amalgamated' source code BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-04 14:20 +0000
            Re: 'Amalgamated' source code BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-04 15:07 +0000
              Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-04 15:34 +0000
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 08:03 -0800
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-04 17:09 +0000
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code bart4858@gmail.com - 2017-01-04 08:54 -0800
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-04 17:22 +0000
              Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 07:55 -0800
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-05 18:04 +0000
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-01-05 11:50 -0800
  Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2017-01-04 16:29 +0000
    Re: 'Amalgamated' source code bart4858@gmail.com - 2017-01-04 09:15 -0800
      Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-05 08:33 +1300
        Re: 'Amalgamated' source code BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-04 20:26 +0000
          Re: 'Amalgamated' source code supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-01-04 13:09 -0800
          Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-05 10:21 +1300
            Re: 'Amalgamated' source code supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-01-04 13:51 -0800
            Re: 'Amalgamated' source code BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-04 22:02 +0000
              Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-05 11:15 +1300
      Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2017-01-07 06:38 +0000
        Re: 'Amalgamated' source code BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-07 11:35 +0000
    Re: 'Amalgamated' source code supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-01-04 09:53 -0800
    Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-01-04 11:50 -0800
    Re: 'Amalgamated' source code raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2017-01-10 01:34 +0000
      Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-01-10 01:59 -0800
      Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2017-01-10 06:55 -0600
      Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-01-10 14:48 +0000
  Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-04-26 07:17 -0700

csiph-web