Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #101040

Re: 'Amalgamated' source code

Show all headers | View raw

On 03/01/2017 20:48, Thiago Adams wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 5:47:24 PM UTC-2, Bart wrote:
>> On 03/01/2017 16:47, Thiago Adams wrote:

>>> (I also have implemented an C preprocessor.)
>>
>> (I'm [in] the middle of one at the minute. Most online refs on writing
>> compilers tend to ignore this piffling little obstacle that you have to
>> overcome first!)
>
> I didn't find a good references. I did it completely wrong at the beginning.
> This is an sample from C standard that shows me my first mistakes.
>
> #define hash_hash # ## #
> #define mkstr(a) # a
> #define in_between(a) mkstr(a)
> #define join(c, d) in_between(c hash_hash d)
> char p[] = join(x, y);
> // equivalent to
> // char p[] = "x ## y";
>
> I saw much more mistakes, parsing real code. (windows.h)

I'll have to make a collection of tricky examples for my testing.

(But I've just seen one detail I hadn't allowed for, in gcc.c (from 
http://people.csail.mit.edu/smcc/projects/single-file-programs/). On 
line 733881 in a macro call:

DEF_FORMAT_ATTRIBUTE(PRINTF,1,1_0)

The token '1_0' appears. It starts as a number but presumably must be 
treated as alphanumeric.

I don't know if that puts paid to the idea of introducing underscores as 
numeric separators; from the bizarreness of how the CPP works, probably 
not!)

>> OS where the right modules have to be picked). I'll be glad when my new
>> C to C translator works then it'll be automatic.
>
> What is this "C to C translator"?

It was originally a compiler for another language with C source as a 
possible target (which builds entire projects). Then I thought it would 
be more fun to work on a front end for C source.

But retaining a C output option has several benefits, including 
converting multi-module apps to single-file C source code, and 
translating experimental language extensions to standard C.

> I guess C Front, had these problems at the beginning when it use to generate C code.
> C++ headers (class declaration) have different representation in C.
> I think one possible solution could be generate an include with different declarations.

C must be able to directly implement what is being expressed in the 
source language. I've had to drop (or avoid using) some features because 
of that restriction.

-- 
Bartc

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

'Amalgamated' source code BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-03 15:14 +0000
  Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 08:47 -0800
    Re: 'Amalgamated' source code BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-03 19:47 +0000
      Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 12:48 -0800
        Re: 'Amalgamated' source code BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-03 21:36 +0000
          Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 16:01 -0800
            Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-01-03 16:26 -0800
              Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 18:00 -0800
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-04 03:34 +0000
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 03:31 -0800
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-04 12:03 +0000
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 05:00 -0800
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-01-05 02:38 -0800
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-05 14:28 +0000
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-01-05 08:20 -0800
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-05 17:05 +0000
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-01-05 10:11 -0800
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-05 19:46 +0000
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-01-05 12:15 -0800
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-05 21:54 +0000
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-05 17:40 +0000
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-05 19:33 +0000
            Re: 'Amalgamated' source code BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-04 10:53 +0000
          Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-04 01:51 +0000
        Re: 'Amalgamated' source code BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-04 11:54 +0000
          Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 05:57 -0800
            Re: 'Amalgamated' source code BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-04 14:20 +0000
            Re: 'Amalgamated' source code BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-04 15:07 +0000
              Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-04 15:34 +0000
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 08:03 -0800
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-04 17:09 +0000
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code bart4858@gmail.com - 2017-01-04 08:54 -0800
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-04 17:22 +0000
              Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 07:55 -0800
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-05 18:04 +0000
                Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-01-05 11:50 -0800
  Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2017-01-04 16:29 +0000
    Re: 'Amalgamated' source code bart4858@gmail.com - 2017-01-04 09:15 -0800
      Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-05 08:33 +1300
        Re: 'Amalgamated' source code BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-04 20:26 +0000
          Re: 'Amalgamated' source code supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-01-04 13:09 -0800
          Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-05 10:21 +1300
            Re: 'Amalgamated' source code supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-01-04 13:51 -0800
            Re: 'Amalgamated' source code BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-04 22:02 +0000
              Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-05 11:15 +1300
      Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2017-01-07 06:38 +0000
        Re: 'Amalgamated' source code BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-07 11:35 +0000
    Re: 'Amalgamated' source code supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-01-04 09:53 -0800
    Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-01-04 11:50 -0800
    Re: 'Amalgamated' source code raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2017-01-10 01:34 +0000
      Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-01-10 01:59 -0800
      Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2017-01-10 06:55 -0600
      Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-01-10 14:48 +0000
  Re: 'Amalgamated' source code Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-04-26 07:17 -0700

csiph-web