Re: attosecond science

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: attosecond science
Date	2016-12-02 12:09 -0600
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<o1sdc6$15m0$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(16 earlier) <o1s19r$det$3@gioia.aioe.org> <d598b60a-b4a6-48f0-ad84-071c65929468@googlegroups.com> <1672c470-bf18-4d0f-8998-ea38927ad005@googlegroups.com> <31f74c44-2170-4c5c-819e-802ce28e5c79@googlegroups.com> <o1sb4i$11jl$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw

On 12/2/2016 11:31 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> You seem to be studiously avoiding the discussion about hydrogen. Allow
> me to reiterate. In a hydrogen atom:
> - you have posited things radiated from the electron that impact the
> proton with a push.
> - you have posited things radiated from the proton that impact the
> electron with a push.
> - you have declared that the energy transmitted in these opposite
> directions are equal
>
> Now, here are the questions you need to answer with your model:
> 1. With the proton and the electron both being PUSHED by the things
> passed between them, what keeps hydrogen atoms TOGETHER?
> 2. Since you claim that these passed things account for gravity and
> inertia, how is it that these equal amounts back and forth result in the
> proton having 2000 times more inertia and gravity than the electron?

And by the way, John, I don't care if your answers to these questions 
come in the form of words, or in the form of mathematical equations and 
tables of calculated numbers, or in the form of references to external 
publications. Usually, physical explanations involve all three, so feel 
free to do whatever you need.

But what would be the point of offering an explanation of atoms if you 
can't actually EXPLAIN anything?

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Thread

attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-29 20:56 -0800
  attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-29 21:33 -0800
    Re: attosecond science moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-30 15:45 +0000
      Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-30 08:09 -0800
        Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-30 09:53 -0800
          Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-30 12:13 -0600
          Re: attosecond science edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-30 15:50 -0800
            Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-30 18:59 -0800
              Re: attosecond science edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-30 21:10 -0800
              Re: attosecond science moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-01 12:47 +0000
                Re: attosecond science edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-12-01 07:15 -0800
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 07:24 -0800
                Re: attosecond science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 07:58 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 10:57 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 09:10 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 11:54 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 10:08 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 12:40 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 10:47 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 13:28 -0600
                Re: attosecond science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 11:40 -0800
                Re: attosecond science edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-12-01 11:28 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 13:32 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 12:55 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 15:26 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 13:36 -0800
                Re: attosecond science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 13:42 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 15:48 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 14:19 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 16:22 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 15:23 -0800
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 15:47 -0800
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 06:34 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 09:43 -0600
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 08:43 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 06:53 -0800
                Re: attosecond science moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-02 15:15 +0000
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 09:44 -0600
                Re: attosecond science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 08:12 -0800
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 08:56 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 11:31 -0600
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 12:09 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 10:36 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 12:42 -0600
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 12:55 -0600
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 16:56 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 15:40 -0800
                Re: attosecond science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 05:35 -0800
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 10:19 -0800
                Re: attosecond science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 13:35 -0800
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 18:24 -0800
                Re: attosecond science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 18:41 -0800
                Re: attosecond science benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-03 22:30 -0500
                Re: attosecond science moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-04 05:36 +0000
                Re: attosecond science noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 17:50 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 08:08 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 08:09 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 10:24 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 09:21 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 11:40 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 10:01 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 12:10 -0600
                Re: attosecond science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 11:17 -0800
                Re: attosecond science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 12:00 -0800
                Re: attosecond science edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-12-02 12:27 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 14:54 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 13:12 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 16:49 -0600
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 08:40 -0600
                Re: attosecond science edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-12-01 14:16 -0800
                Re: attosecond science edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-12-01 11:25 -0800
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 11:29 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 13:34 -0600
                Re: attosecond science edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-12-01 14:13 -0800
                Re: attosecond science moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-01 17:08 +0000
                Re: attosecond science edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-12-01 11:19 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 08:31 -0800
            b0s0n is what ... b0s0ns d00 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 12:15 -0800
              just cahnge the variables, such that b0s0ny is what ... b0s0ns d00 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 14:02 -0800
        Re: attosecond science moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-30 18:07 +0000
          Re: attosecond science noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-30 12:06 -0800
  attosecond science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 11:05 -0800
  Re: attosecond science "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 09:31 -0800
    Re: attosecond science "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 10:02 -0800
      Re: attosecond science "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-05 12:02 -0800
  Re: attosecond science "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 09:55 -0800
    Re: attosecond science "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-05 12:09 -0800

csiph-web