Re: attosecond science

From	moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: attosecond science
Date	2016-12-01 17:08 +0000
Organization	The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID	<o1ple7$956$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <ecefa2e8-62d6-492c-ad52-26f9c23803ad@googlegroups.com> <2315f2c5-d5cb-4ca5-8440-391e884618d2@googlegroups.com> <1ebee0e4-bff1-430b-9e72-42b3dced2ce4@googlegroups.com> <o1p65a$hm$1@pcls7.std.com> <e0f63591-6c91-49fa-bb31-f504f7cdb93b@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> tarded:

>Michael"

>Of course picturing the electron as a little ball moving in a certain 
>path at .003c still violates Heisenberg and the acceleration/radiation 
>issue so without good reason there's no use wasting time with that. "

>You know electrons don't radiate because...?
>You know you can NEVER know because...?

Because we can point an instrument capable of detecting electromagnetic
radiation from DC to daylight (and beyond) at a chunk of matter, and not
detect anything.

(note that accelerating electric charges emit ordinary electromagnetic
radiation, so your expected response of "the next level down" or some
such crap won't cut it.  We'd see ordinary electromagnetic radiation.

Because we're here.  If they did radiate, they'd lose energy and crash
into the nucleus. We're here because that hasn't happened.  Before you
reply, give a good reason why the law of conservation of energy should
be violated.

>Wow. Talking to tards 

You're using a mirror, I see.

Thread

attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-29 20:56 -0800
  attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-29 21:33 -0800
    Re: attosecond science moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-30 15:45 +0000
      Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-30 08:09 -0800
        Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-30 09:53 -0800
          Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-30 12:13 -0600
          Re: attosecond science edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-30 15:50 -0800
            Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-30 18:59 -0800
              Re: attosecond science edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-30 21:10 -0800
              Re: attosecond science moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-01 12:47 +0000
                Re: attosecond science edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-12-01 07:15 -0800
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 07:24 -0800
                Re: attosecond science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 07:58 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 10:57 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 09:10 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 11:54 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 10:08 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 12:40 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 10:47 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 13:28 -0600
                Re: attosecond science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 11:40 -0800
                Re: attosecond science edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-12-01 11:28 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 13:32 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 12:55 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 15:26 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 13:36 -0800
                Re: attosecond science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 13:42 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 15:48 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 14:19 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 16:22 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 15:23 -0800
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 15:47 -0800
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 06:34 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 09:43 -0600
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 08:43 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 06:53 -0800
                Re: attosecond science moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-02 15:15 +0000
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 09:44 -0600
                Re: attosecond science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 08:12 -0800
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 08:56 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 11:31 -0600
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 12:09 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 10:36 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 12:42 -0600
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 12:55 -0600
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 16:56 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 15:40 -0800
                Re: attosecond science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 05:35 -0800
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 10:19 -0800
                Re: attosecond science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 13:35 -0800
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 18:24 -0800
                Re: attosecond science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 18:41 -0800
                Re: attosecond science benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-03 22:30 -0500
                Re: attosecond science moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-04 05:36 +0000
                Re: attosecond science noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 17:50 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 08:08 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 08:09 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 10:24 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 09:21 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 11:40 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 10:01 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 12:10 -0600
                Re: attosecond science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 11:17 -0800
                Re: attosecond science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 12:00 -0800
                Re: attosecond science edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-12-02 12:27 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 14:54 -0600
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 13:12 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 16:49 -0600
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 08:40 -0600
                Re: attosecond science edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-12-01 14:16 -0800
                Re: attosecond science edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-12-01 11:25 -0800
                Re: attosecond science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 11:29 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 13:34 -0600
                Re: attosecond science edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-12-01 14:13 -0800
                Re: attosecond science moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-01 17:08 +0000
                Re: attosecond science edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-12-01 11:19 -0800
                Re: attosecond science Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 08:31 -0800
            b0s0n is what ... b0s0ns d00 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 12:15 -0800
              just cahnge the variables, such that b0s0ny is what ... b0s0ns d00 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 14:02 -0800
        Re: attosecond science moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-30 18:07 +0000
          Re: attosecond science noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-30 12:06 -0800
  attosecond science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 11:05 -0800
  Re: attosecond science "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 09:31 -0800
    Re: attosecond science "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 10:02 -0800
      Re: attosecond science "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-05 12:02 -0800
  Re: attosecond science "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 09:55 -0800
    Re: attosecond science "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-05 12:09 -0800

csiph-web