Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar

From	jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar
Date	2016-11-18 22:38 +0100
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<o0nsbr$6rt$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(7 earlier) <o0ldgt$kl5$1@dont-email.me> <lnpoltfzjw.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <877f81rv9g.fsf@gmail.com> <o0nq1n$u0q$1@dont-email.me> <87k2c0xzh4.fsf@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Le 18/11/2016 à 22:14, Gareth Owen a écrit :
> Then you need to express your self in a calmer manner when someone does
> disagree with you. Instead, you have a tendency to express the sentiment
> that you think Keith has some sort of vendetta against you.

Wait, we were talking about the documentation of gcc isn't it?

Mr Thompson presented a link with the question

Are you suggesting that gcc has no technical documentation?

I answered with two detailed answers, where I said in essence that those 
web pages aren't any technical docs, but mostly BUGs or TO DO items.

Documenting gcc is a heavy task, and I do not complain, all that comes 
from a slight critic of gcc that overwhelms the user with tons of code. 
Lcc is smaller, but obviously not as sophisticated as gcc.

And has a good technical doc in the form of a book, that explains 
everything very clearly.

To that answer, Mr thompson started saying that he did not read the 
docs, all in caps lock, like shouting.

Why do you intervene in a conversation with a document you haven't even 
read?

It  is kind of amusing, if you take it at face value.

Behind is a defense of gcc at all costs, where there isn't even any 
fight: lcc will never produce code as fast as gcc.

That was not the point. We were talking about lcc's book as an example 
of good technical doccs. And I still believe is a good example.

I did not start anything that I could not prove. The number of bytes/mb 
of code is quite small really.

Two sentences and parsing is done. Well, OK.

Thread

Experimental languages/features for C or similar Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 03:07 -0800
  Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-08 13:25 +0100
    Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 05:47 -0800
      Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-08 21:03 +0100
        Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 12:10 -0800
          Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-08 21:17 +0100
            Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 13:27 -0800
              Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-09 11:19 +0100
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-11-09 03:00 -0800
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-09 09:04 -0800
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-11-09 09:57 -0800
  Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 05:16 -0800
    Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-08 06:22 -0800
      Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 06:52 -0800
        Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 07:08 -0800
          Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-08 07:47 -0800
      Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 08:13 -0800
        Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 08:48 -0800
        Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 03:21 -0800
  Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 22:16 +0800
    Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 08:00 -0800
      Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-09 00:13 +0800
        Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-08 08:41 -0800
          Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 08:50 -0800
            Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-11-08 17:10 +0000
  Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-08 19:06 +0100
  Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Andreas <nospam@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-08 21:43 +0100
  Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-11-10 12:29 -0800
    Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 02:35 -0800
    Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-11 10:43 +0000
      Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-17 20:15 +0100
        Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-11-17 11:59 -0800
          Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-17 22:27 +0100
            Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-17 22:45 +0100
            Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-11-17 14:28 -0800
              Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-18 00:13 +0100
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-11-17 15:37 -0800
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 09:29 +0000
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-18 21:59 +0100
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 21:14 +0000
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-18 22:38 +0100
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-18 11:26 +0100
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-11-18 08:56 -0800
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-18 08:16 +0100
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-18 11:42 +0100
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-18 13:16 +0100
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-11-18 12:23 +0000
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-18 14:28 +0100
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-11-18 14:24 +0000
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2016-11-18 14:34 +0000
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-18 14:37 +0000
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 14:38 +0000
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-18 15:47 +0100
                [OT] Linux and Firefox "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 22:50 +0800
                Re: Window$ and Firefox "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 22:51 +0800
                Re: taskkill "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 22:52 +0800
                Re: taskkill David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-18 16:44 +0100
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-11-18 15:11 +0000
                Re: Who cares (about Window$)? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 23:24 +0800
                Re: Who cares (about Window$)? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-18 16:41 +0100
                Re: Who cares (about Window$)? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-11-18 16:45 +0100
                Re: Who cares (about Window$)? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-18 17:35 +0100
                Re: Who cares (about Window$)? Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-11-18 13:10 -0400
                Re: Who cares (about Window$)? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-11-18 18:29 +0000
                Re: Who cares (about Window$)? jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2016-11-18 11:49 -0800
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2016-11-18 11:42 -0800
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-11-19 20:37 +0000
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 12:34 +0000
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-18 13:46 +0100
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-18 13:44 +0100
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-18 14:44 +0100
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-19 01:16 +0100
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-19 15:43 +0100
                Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-19 18:13 +0100
            Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-11-18 00:16 +0000
              Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-18 09:25 +0100
          Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-18 18:15 +0000
            Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 19:18 +0000
        Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-18 08:20 +0100
  Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 20:36 +0800

csiph-web