Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar |
| Date | 2016-11-17 15:37 -0800 |
| Organization | None to speak of |
| Message-ID | <lnpoltfzjw.fsf@kst-u.example.com> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <o0kvjd$ung$1@dont-email.me> <ln37ipho79.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <o0l7b3$s29$1@dont-email.me> <lntwb5g2qv.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <o0ldgt$kl5$1@dont-email.me> |
jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> writes:
> Le 17/11/2016 à 23:28, Keith Thompson a écrit :
>> jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> writes:
>>> Le 17/11/2016 á 20:59, Keith Thompson a écrit :
>>>> jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> writes:
>>>> [...]
>>>>> When they make available the whole compiler with commented source code?
>>>>> This is not just GNU that overwhelms us with megabytes of code where the
>>>>> only comment is the copyright notice and no technical documentation.
>>>>> This is a fully commented code in a top down manner, easy to get into.
>>>>
>>>> Are you saying gcc has no technical documentation?
>>>>
>>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/
>>>>
>>>> (I make no comment on the quality of the documentation, since I haven't
>>>> read it.)
>>>
>>> If you haven't read it why do you say that that is documentation?
>>>
>>> Well obviously you say that because you haven't read it.
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> Apparently saying "I make no comment on the quality of the
>> documentation, since I haven't read it" wasn't clear enough.
>> Let me restate it more clearly for you.
>>
>> I MAKE NO COMMENT ON THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENTATION, SINCE I
>> HAVEN'T READ IT.
>
> But you say that those 1256 bytes are "documentation".
What 1256 bytes are you talking about? I posted a link to the index
page of a manual containing 25 chapters. Is it not displaying correctly
for you? I have the equivalent manual on my system as "gccint.info.gz",
which is 2486404 bytes after decompression.
I am not saying that the size of the documentation has anything to do
with its quality. I am saying only that it exists. I said so, with an
appropriate disclaimer. Anyone is free to follow the link and reach
their own conclusions.
If you're saying that it's of such low quality that it shouldn't even be
called "documentation", I won't argue with you.
As usual, I have no idea why you have a problem with me.
[SNIP]
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Experimental languages/features for C or similar Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 03:07 -0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-08 13:25 +0100
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 05:47 -0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-08 21:03 +0100
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 12:10 -0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-08 21:17 +0100
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 13:27 -0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-09 11:19 +0100
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-11-09 03:00 -0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-09 09:04 -0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-11-09 09:57 -0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 05:16 -0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-08 06:22 -0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 06:52 -0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 07:08 -0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-08 07:47 -0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 08:13 -0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 08:48 -0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 03:21 -0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 22:16 +0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 08:00 -0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-09 00:13 +0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-08 08:41 -0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 08:50 -0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-11-08 17:10 +0000
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-08 19:06 +0100
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Andreas <nospam@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-08 21:43 +0100
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-11-10 12:29 -0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 02:35 -0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-11 10:43 +0000
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-17 20:15 +0100
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-11-17 11:59 -0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-17 22:27 +0100
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-17 22:45 +0100
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-11-17 14:28 -0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-18 00:13 +0100
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-11-17 15:37 -0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 09:29 +0000
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-18 21:59 +0100
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 21:14 +0000
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-18 22:38 +0100
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-18 11:26 +0100
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-11-18 08:56 -0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-18 08:16 +0100
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-18 11:42 +0100
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-18 13:16 +0100
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-11-18 12:23 +0000
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-18 14:28 +0100
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-11-18 14:24 +0000
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2016-11-18 14:34 +0000
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-18 14:37 +0000
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 14:38 +0000
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-18 15:47 +0100
[OT] Linux and Firefox "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 22:50 +0800
Re: Window$ and Firefox "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 22:51 +0800
Re: taskkill "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 22:52 +0800
Re: taskkill David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-18 16:44 +0100
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-11-18 15:11 +0000
Re: Who cares (about Window$)? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 23:24 +0800
Re: Who cares (about Window$)? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-18 16:41 +0100
Re: Who cares (about Window$)? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-11-18 16:45 +0100
Re: Who cares (about Window$)? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-18 17:35 +0100
Re: Who cares (about Window$)? Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-11-18 13:10 -0400
Re: Who cares (about Window$)? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-11-18 18:29 +0000
Re: Who cares (about Window$)? jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2016-11-18 11:49 -0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2016-11-18 11:42 -0800
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-11-19 20:37 +0000
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 12:34 +0000
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-18 13:46 +0100
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-18 13:44 +0100
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-18 14:44 +0100
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-19 01:16 +0100
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-19 15:43 +0100
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-19 18:13 +0100
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-11-18 00:16 +0000
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-18 09:25 +0100
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-18 18:15 +0000
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 19:18 +0000
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-18 08:20 +0100
Re: Experimental languages/features for C or similar "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 20:36 +0800
csiph-web