Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #603597

Re: Approved by Archimedes Plutonium

From Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Approved by Archimedes Plutonium
Date 2016-11-03 07:22 -0500
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <nvfa73$jf9$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <939961a6-5c7d-4dad-b3dd-00a8d23b7789@googlegroups.com> <nvbvpg$mg5$1@dont-email.me> <nvc073$nhd$1@dont-email.me> <nvcp23$9qr$1@pcls7.std.com> <nvd5ap$fn2$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On 11/2/2016 11:47 AM, Poutnik wrote:
> On 11/02/2016 02:17 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
>> The TV weatherman term "Doppler Radar" exaggerates the use of the Doppler
>> effect for weather radar, as the Doppler effect is only part of the
>> useful
>> data returned by the system.
>
>> [...]
>
> As the "pulse Doppler radar"
> is the official technical term for the used device,
> the TV weatherman's term Doppler radar is no exaggeration.
>
> I would rather say the Doppler effect is not part of data,
> but rather a part of useful data manifests the Doppler effect.
>
>

Doppler radar usually requires 2 feed horns instead of one.
one receive, one transmit.
many have 4.

no big deal, just more expensive, more hardware.

drop size can be determined by returing reflected amplitudes and using 
different frequencies, and there are polarization effects.

Interesting area

you can buy a complete new weather radar for just $2,500.  (made for 
boats, you can put it on your house or truck)

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Approved by Archimedes Plutonium James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 08:29 -0700
  Re: Approved by Archimedes Plutonium Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 19:13 -0700
    Re: Approved by Archimedes Plutonium Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 07:07 +0100
      Re: Approved by Archimedes Plutonium Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 07:14 +0100
        Re: Approved by Archimedes Plutonium moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-02 13:17 +0000
          Re: Approved by Archimedes Plutonium Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 17:47 +0100
            Re: Approved by Archimedes Plutonium noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 17:18 -0700
              Re: Approved by Archimedes Plutonium Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 06:01 +0100
            Re: Approved by Archimedes Plutonium Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-03 07:22 -0500
              a.p approves ... what ever noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 13:52 -0700

csiph-web