Re: Approved by Archimedes Plutonium

From	moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Approved by Archimedes Plutonium
Date	2016-11-02 13:17 +0000
Organization	The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID	<nvcp23$9qr$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References	<dac17194-afff-49ac-974e-cf2896e090a4@googlegroups.com> <939961a6-5c7d-4dad-b3dd-00a8d23b7789@googlegroups.com> <nvbvpg$mg5$1@dont-email.me> <nvc073$nhd$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> writes:

>Dne 02/11/2016 v 07:07 Poutnik napsal(a):
>> Dne 02/11/2016 v 03:13 Archimedes Plutonium napsal(a):
>>>
>>> How dumb are they? So dumb they think Doppler Radar exists.
>>>
>> 
>> Of course it exists,
>> analyzing frequency shifts caused by reflections
>> from moving targets in military,  [...]

>P.S.> For anti-aircraft systems, Doppler radar has advantage
>not to get fooled by metal striped counter measures,
>nor by horizon reflection interference.

The TV weatherman term "Doppler Radar" exaggerates the use of the Doppler
effect for weather radar, as the Doppler effect is only part of the useful
data returned by the system.  But the Doppler effect is, in fact, used, it
gives data for the horizontal motion of precipitation due to wind, and
also rotation due to tornadic activity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doppler_radar

Several months ago there were tornado warnings in this area and the TV
weather report showed a radar screen they normally never show. It had
different colors corresponding to motion toward or away from the radar
due to the Doppler effect, and they pointed out a particular cloud system
which showed significant rotation.  I believe there was an actual tornado
or funnel cloud that day (no damage).

Thread

Approved by Archimedes Plutonium James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 08:29 -0700
  Re: Approved by Archimedes Plutonium Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 19:13 -0700
    Re: Approved by Archimedes Plutonium Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 07:07 +0100
      Re: Approved by Archimedes Plutonium Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 07:14 +0100
        Re: Approved by Archimedes Plutonium moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-02 13:17 +0000
          Re: Approved by Archimedes Plutonium Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 17:47 +0100
            Re: Approved by Archimedes Plutonium noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 17:18 -0700
              Re: Approved by Archimedes Plutonium Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 06:01 +0100
            Re: Approved by Archimedes Plutonium Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-03 07:22 -0500
              a.p approves ... what ever noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 13:52 -0700

csiph-web