Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #602320
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard |
| Date | 2016-10-24 10:11 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <nul8bf$j8f$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (14 earlier) <7f1b1f33-31ad-4ab9-8312-319125bede90@googlegroups.com> <nugcrq$1h3c$1@gioia.aioe.org> <380b3d9e-47f2-40a6-874d-423fca50006b@googlegroups.com> <nul3re$as2$1@gioia.aioe.org> <d4b35522-6d62-4037-b359-21ce8cf9147a@googlegroups.com> |
On 10/24/2016 9:38 AM, poraty350@gmail.com wrote: > On Monday, October 24, 2016 at 4:54:58 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 10/22/2016 11:18 PM, poraty350@gmail.com wrote: >>> On Saturday, October 22, 2016 at 9:58:07 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> On 10/22/2016 9:55 AM, poraty350@gmail.com wrote: >>>>> NOW >>>>> WHER THE LELL !!! (i am trying to be polite )...YOU SEE IN IT >>>>> ANYTHING TO MULTIPLY anything >>>>> BY ZERO ???!! >>>>> OR BY ***ANYTHING RELATIVISTIC*** !!!!????? >>>> >>>> Relativistic theory is not characterized by a multiplicative factor. >>>> >>>> If you're asking, "where is the gamma?", there are lots of relativistic >>>> equations that don't have a gamma in it. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables >>> ================================ >>> Mr Bodkin >>> - >>> as usual you are deliberately diverting obfuscating the >>> above issue >>> and I will not let you to do it >>> as follows and simple >>> - >>> 1 >>> E = h f s a comprehensive substantiated formula for >>> photon energy >> >> Yes. > ===================== > thank Goodness (:-) > >> >>> >>> 2 >>> one of its basic dimensions is mass (KILOGRAM ) >> >> Which proves NOTHING. The units for the permittivity of EMPTY SPACE are > = > nasty pig !! > do you want to tell us that empty space has mass ???!! > or may be rather it has zero mass zero mass ??!!! You're not listening. It is YOU that is saying that if there are kilograms in the units, then there must be mass in the thing. I've just given you a clear counterexample of a property of EMPTY SPACE that has kilograms in the units, yet we KNOW there is no mass in empty space. It is NOT TRUE that if there are kilograms in the units, then this tells you there is mass in the thing. You have made a mistake about what units mean. > >> s^4 A^2 / m^3 kg. There are no kilograms or amperes or seconds for that >> matter in empty space. >> >> You have this BONEHEAD notion that the units of a number somehow convey >> physical properties of the thing carrying that number, when in fact >> nothing of the sort is true. You are simply mistaken here. >> >>> >>> 3 >>> IN THAT FORMULA >>> THERE IS **NOT ** >>> ANY ZERO MULTIPLYER >> >> Nor should there be. > ================== > h f is > 6.6. exp -34 times Kilogram Metter ^2/second ^2 times a scalr > === > do you shameless gangster criminal against mankind > see in it > anything like a zero multiplier to it ??!! No. Nor should there be. > === > so > how can a nasty pig like you sat that > there are not Kilograms there > AND NOTHIING TO MULTYPLY IT BY ZERO !!! > =============== It is NEVER the case that there is a multiplier that removes units. But having a units of kilograms does NOT mean there is mass in the thing. I've just given you an OBVIOUS example of something that has no mass and yet there are kilograms in the units. >> >>> 4 >>> IN THAT FORMULA >>> THERE IS NOT ANY RELATIVISTIC MULTIPLYER >> >> Of course not. You don't recognize relativity equations by the presence >> of a gamma multiplier. > ==== > if not by the gamma multiplier than by what ???!! I can't help it if you don't understand relativity. It is simply WRONG that the way you recognize a relativistic equation is by a particular factor, gamma or otherwise. Don't try. > === > >> >>> 5 >>> the photon moves at the velocity of c !!!! >> >> Yes, so? > ======================== > imbecilic dreck gangster > IT MEANS THAT > IF THE PHOTON HAS MASS THE ONLY MASSS !! > AND IT MOVES AT c > ""*MOVEMENT DOES NOT CREATE MASS !! Nobody claims that movement creates mass. You are stuck in the past. In today's physics, mass is INVARIANT and does not change with motion. This has been true for decades. Please catch up. > GOT IT LITTLE DRECK CROCK > == > IF IT STILL MOVES AR C AND DOES NOT HAVE RELATIVISTIC MASS > --NOTHING(no mass ) THAT MOVES **SLOWER** THAN THAT > -DOES NOT HAVE RELATIVISTRICV MASS AS WELL !!! > --- > MOVEMENT DOES NOT CREATE MASS !!! > (AND THE MOMENT IT STOPS MOVING > YOUR F EM RELATIVISTIC MASS > MAGICALLY DISSAPPEAR !! > >> >>> ------ >>> IF WE COMBINE ALL THE ABOVE 5 FACTS ???? >>> ====================== >>> >>> WHAT ARE ARE THE (semi intelligent' )CONCLUTIONS THAT WE CAN DRAW OUT >>> OF IT ?? >> >> Not what you are attempting to conclude. > === > JUST BECAUSEYOU SAY/MUMBLE IT !! > WHITHOUT PROVING ANYTHING !! > ***AND DENYINGS FACTS THAT ARE > ****BLACK ON WHITE WRITTEN ??!!*** > ====== > BUT CHEATING THAT > THE ENERGY OF PHOTON > DOESW NOT HAVE THE MASS DIMENSION !! > even > less cleave people > do not Deny that the photon has mass > but > claim > ''IT HAS """RELATIVISTIC MASS""" > no one !!!say > zero mass''' while it is written ***black on white !!!! > and no zero multilayer there!!! > ======= > YOUR TECHER JOSEF .. > SAIED > 'THE BIGGER THE LIE YOU WILL SAY > -THE MORE CHANCES ARE IT WILL BE SWALOWED BY THE MOB'' > > end of quote ~~~ > > > === > YOU ARE NOT A SCIENTISRT > YOU ARE A SHAMLESS PIG GANGSTER > THAT CAN CHEAT > WITHOUT BLINKING AN EYE !! > (may be even a psycho ?? > ======= > next!!! to human beings !!! > > Y.Porat > ============================================= > > > -- >> Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
EVERY MUMBLER THAT WANTS TO POSE BIGGER THAN HIMSELF -USES THE 'WORD'' poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-15 00:34 -0700
Re: EVERY MUMBLER THAT WANTS TO POSE BIGGER THAN HIMSELF -USES THE 'WORD'' noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 16:22 -0700
b*Z*Z S*N*N*M**s noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 21:44 -0700
Re: b*Z*Z S*N*N*M**s poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 22:46 -0700
Re: b*Z*Z S*N*N*M**s poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 22:52 -0700
Re: EVERY MUMBLER THAT WANTS TO POSE BIGGER THAN HIMSELF -USES THE 'WORD'' poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 22:37 -0700
poseurs ominous noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 10:16 -0700
Re: poseurs ominous poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-17 21:12 -0700
Re: poseurs ominous "King Knutsacco" <b.krazy@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-17 21:54 -0700
Re: poseurs ominous poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-18 03:40 -0700
c.o.m.m.u.t.a.t.i.n.g operators (+, x; maybe -, / etc. ad finitum noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 11:01 -0700
Re: c.o.m.m.u.t.a.t.i.n.g operators (+, x; maybe -, / etc. ad finitum poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-19 02:49 -0700
there, so noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 10:03 -0700
Re: there, so poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-20 00:05 -0700
why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 11:22 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-20 11:40 -0700
stop it -- mystreating your keyboard noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 12:39 -0700
Re: stop it -- mystreating your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-20 19:18 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 09:17 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-21 11:14 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 13:23 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-21 22:11 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-22 06:04 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-22 08:53 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-22 07:55 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard "Brian McConnel" <ballunatic@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-22 10:02 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-22 10:50 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-22 13:58 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-22 21:18 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-24 08:55 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-24 07:38 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-24 10:11 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-24 09:54 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-25 07:47 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-25 08:49 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-25 07:34 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-26 03:55 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-26 22:09 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-27 16:13 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-28 00:20 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-28 05:29 -0700
1/37,20,00 seconds per mile (the period of the sphere, or diameter, or reciprocal of curvature noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-28 18:10 -0700
Re: 1/37,20,00 seconds per mile (the period of the sphere, or diameter, or reciprocal of curvature poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-28 22:21 -0700
Re: 1/37,20,00 seconds per mile (the period of the sphere, or diameter, or reciprocal of curvature noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 13:19 -0700
Re: 1/37,20,00 seconds per mile (the period of the sphere, or diameter, or reciprocal of curvature poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-29 20:01 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 16:09 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-01 01:08 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard grahamcooper7@gmail.com - 2016-11-02 03:28 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-02 11:14 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 17:27 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-03 02:22 -0700
your keyboard could sue, you, though, iff noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 14:02 -0700
Re: your keyboard could sue, you, though, iff poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-03 23:54 -0700
Re: your keyboard could sue, you, though, iff noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-04 11:56 -0700
Re: your keyboard could sue, you, though, iff poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-04 23:29 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 14:00 -0600
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 16:06 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 16:12 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 01:27 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 08:13 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 06:46 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 12:36 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 14:15 -0600
be causal noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 21:08 -0800
Re: be causal poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-08 22:17 -0800
Re: be causal noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-09 12:18 -0800
Re: be causal poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-10 02:34 -0800
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-10 23:13 -0800
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 16:55 -0800
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 13:03 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 13:13 -0700
"plonk" -- we know, you are just going to rattle your keyboard; this is my last reply to you noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 16:13 -0700
Re: "plonk" -- we know, you are just going to rattle your keyboard; this is my last reply to you grahamcooper7@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 21:04 -0700
Re: "plonk" -- we know, you are just going to rattle your keyboard; this is my last reply to you poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 22:14 -0700
Re: "plonk" -- we know, you are just going to rattle your keyboard; this is my last reply to you poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 22:11 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 14:13 -0600
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 01:03 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 08:11 -0500
a while hath been noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 12:26 -0700
Re: a while hath been poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 12:41 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-16 10:22 -0800
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 14:17 -0600
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-17 05:26 -0800
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 10:00 -0600
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-17 08:58 -0800
why don't you just think, awhile ... we have plenty of ellipses noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 11:25 -0800
Re: why don't you just think, awhile ... we have plenty of ellipses poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 00:55 -0800
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 11:11 -0800
before mystreatying your keyboard, gAf about permittivity & permeability noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-19 15:29 -0800
Re: before mystreatying your keyboard, gAf about permittivity & permeability poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-20 00:25 -0800
Bodkin knows about permittivity & permeability; po rat is just a typist -- a very bad typist? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-20 13:39 -0800
Re: Bodkin knows about permittivity & permeability; po rat is just a typist -- a very bad typist? poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-21 00:37 -0800
Re: Bodkin knows about permittivity & permeability; po rat is just a typist -- a very bad typist? poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-21 02:54 -0800
bad typist? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 12:04 -0800
Re: Bodkin knows about permittivity & permeability; po rat is just a typist -- a very bad typist? "Alberto Meltdown Jones" <lol_ima_fgt@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 19:37 -0800
Re: Bodkin knows about permittivity & permeability; po rat is just a typist -- a very bad typist? poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-22 01:13 -0800
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-20 14:47 -0600
"HELP," your keyboard screamed, but only Po raT could hear it noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 15:58 -0800
think, awhile, before mystreatying my dumbterinal -- thakyou noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-24 11:58 -0700
Re: think, awhile, before mystreatying my dumbterinal -- thakyou poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-24 21:06 -0700
Re: think, awhile, before mystreatying my dumbterinal -- thakyou noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-27 11:40 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-15 09:12 -0800
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 11:36 -0600
because he just doen't think -- he just l00ks and types at teh same momentbieng noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 12:00 -0800
go read a goddam b00k, you m0r0n noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 11:32 -0700
Re: go read a goddam b00k, you m0r0n poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-21 22:17 -0700
vmv is t.h.a.t noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-23 11:59 -0700
Re: vmv is t.h.a.t poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-24 01:29 -0700
vmv/2 (Liebniz's *vis viva* a.k.a kinetic energy or k.e noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-24 11:55 -0700
Re: vmv/2 (Liebniz's *vis viva* a.k.a kinetic energy or k.e noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 16:57 -0800
Re: vmv/2 (Liebniz's *vis viva* a.k.a kinetic energy or k.e poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-14 22:59 -0800
Re: c.o.m.m.u.t.a.t.i.n.g operators (+, x; maybe -, / etc. ad finitum "Eduardo Grudin" <raving_lunatic@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-19 21:00 -0700
Re: c.o.m.m.u.t.a.t.i.n.g operators (+, x; maybe -, / etc. ad finitum poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-20 00:00 -0700
Re: EVERY MUMBLER THAT WANTS TO POSE BIGGER THAN HIMSELF -USES THE 'WORD'' "Eduardo Space Helmut" <b.karzeddin@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-16 16:49 -0700
Re: EVERY MUMBLER THAT WANTS TO POSE BIGGER THAN HIMSELF -USES THE 'WORD'' poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 22:38 -0700
Re: EVERY MUMBLER THAT WANTS TO POSE BIGGER THAN HIMSELF -USES THE 'WORD'' poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 22:40 -0700
Re: EVERY MUMBLER THAT WANTS TO POSE BIGGER THAN HIMSELF -USES THE 'WORD'' poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-17 04:00 -0700
csiph-web