Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #602429
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard |
| Date | 2016-10-25 07:47 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <nunk93$74n$6@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (15 earlier) <380b3d9e-47f2-40a6-874d-423fca50006b@googlegroups.com> <nul3re$as2$1@gioia.aioe.org> <d4b35522-6d62-4037-b359-21ce8cf9147a@googlegroups.com> <nul8bf$j8f$1@gioia.aioe.org> <720bab29-bc33-48eb-b8b8-ed7eecc2546a@googlegroups.com> |
On 10/24/2016 11:54 AM, poraty350@gmail.com wrote: > On Monday, October 24, 2016 at 6:11:48 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 10/24/2016 9:38 AM, poraty350@gmail.com wrote: >>> On Monday, October 24, 2016 at 4:54:58 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> You're not listening. It is YOU that is saying that if there are >> kilograms in the units, then there must be mass in the thing. I've just >> given you a clear counterexample of a property of EMPTY SPACE that has >> kilograms in the units, yet we KNOW there is no mass in empty space. > ==================== > lier idiot !! > empty space is not our case !!! > what you showed there is > **an hypothetic case that might include > all possibilities !! No, it is a REAL CASE. The permittivity of empty space is a real and measured quantity. It has units kilograms even though there is no mass involved in empty space. You cannot look at units and determine what is involved in that thing. That's not what dimensional analysis does for physicists. YOU are the one saying that the presence of kilograms in the units proves that there is mass involved in the thing. This is disproven by simple and obvious counterexamples. Your claim is flat wrong. > we don't have here all[possibilities !! > our case is more specific !!!!1 > got it lier ?? > = > as i said exactly above > == > ANYONE WHO WANT TO CHEAT > **TAKES HIS TESTIMPNY = TO SOMWE DISTANT PLACE ' > END OF QUOTE > ==== > >> >> It is NOT TRUE that if there are kilograms in the units, then this tells >> you there is mass in the thing. > --- > much less than an idiot !! > ======== >> >> You have made a mistake about what units mean. > ================== > in case you still dnt learn physics > ***units are the basic of physics**!!! Not to do what you are trying to do with them. You cannot use the units of a thing to determine what is part of that thing. > > >>>> s^4 A^2 / m^3 kg. There are no kilograms or amperes or seconds for that > ================= > there are no units in feeling happy > so ??? > 0 >>>> matter in empty space. >>>> >>>> You have this BONEHEAD notion that the units of a number somehow convey > ???? > == > the figure is added to the physical unit > to make it more specific and fit better to reality > and to experimental findings !!t > or else it is not sound science > ================ >>>> physical properties of the thing carrying that number, when in fact >>>> nothing of the sort is true. > why because anonymous P D said so ?? > the very fact that you are anonymous > is an additional question mark on you reliability !! > and motivations !! > ========= > ========== You are simply mistaken here. > said who ??? Says physicists. > -- > >>>> >>>>> >>>>> 3 >>>>> IN THAT FORMULA >>>>> THERE IS **NOT ** >>>>> ANY ZERO MULTIPLYER >>>> >>>> Nor should there be. > > ================= > why ?? > because anonymous said so ?? > ---- > >>> ================== >>> h f is >>> 6.6. exp -34 times Kilogram Metter ^2/second ^2 times a scalr >>> === >>> do you shameless gangster criminal against mankind >>> see in it >>> anything like a zero multiplier to it ??!! > or any relativistic multiplier ??? >> >> No. Nor should there be. > why because anonymous said that ?? > === >> >>> === >>> so >>> how can a nasty pig like you sat that >>> there are not Kilograms there >>> AND NOTHIING TO MULTYPLY IT BY ZERO !!! >>> =============== >> >> It is NEVER the case that there is a multiplier that removes units. > == > did i remove units ??!! > it is yOu that remove units !! > > **THAAT ARE THERE BY ***BLACK ON WHILTE*** !!!### > === > But >> having a units of kilograms does NOT mean there is mass in the thing. > (:-) > greetings to Josef !! > === > >> I've just given you an OBVIOUS example of something that has no mass and >> yet there are kilograms in the units. > == > please remind us !! > === >> >>>> >>>>> 4 >>>>> IN THAT FORMULA >>>>> THERE IS NOT ANY RELATIVISTIC MULTIPLYER >>>> >>>> Of course not. You don't recognize relativity equations by the presence >>>> of a gamma multiplier. > so > by what ?? > yuou example must fit to our case > or to physics at all > one false thing Permittivity of empty space is not a false thing. > does not justify another false thing !! > ===== >>> ==== >>> if not by the gamma multiplier than by what ???!! >> >> I can't help it if you don't understand relativity. >> It is simply WRONG that the way you recognize a relativistic equation is >> by a particular factor, gamma or otherwise. Don't try. > > don't hand wave > just bring ithere == > i have the winning basic powerful rule > ============================ > NO MASS' - THE ONLY MASS** - NO REAL PHYSICS > ========================================= > > don't forget who first thought you that !!.. > ===== >> >>> === >>> >>>> >>>>> 5 >>>>> the photon moves at the velocity of c !!!! >>>> >>>> Yes, so? >>> ======================== >>> imbecilic dreck gangster >>> IT MEANS THAT >>> IF THE PHOTON HAS MASS THE ONLY MASSS !! >>> AND IT MOVES AT c >>> ""*MOVEMENT DOES NOT CREATE MASS !! >> >> Nobody claims that movement creates mass. You are stuck in the past. >> In today's physics, mass is INVARIANT and does not change with motion. > ok > I claimed it long ago many years ago !!the first one !! Bullshit. Invariant mass has been around since the 1930s. You are not 85 years old. > it is recorded in Google !!! > you denied it > along too many years > This has been true for decades. Please catch up. > see just above lier thief !!! > === -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
EVERY MUMBLER THAT WANTS TO POSE BIGGER THAN HIMSELF -USES THE 'WORD'' poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-15 00:34 -0700
Re: EVERY MUMBLER THAT WANTS TO POSE BIGGER THAN HIMSELF -USES THE 'WORD'' noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 16:22 -0700
b*Z*Z S*N*N*M**s noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 21:44 -0700
Re: b*Z*Z S*N*N*M**s poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 22:46 -0700
Re: b*Z*Z S*N*N*M**s poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 22:52 -0700
Re: EVERY MUMBLER THAT WANTS TO POSE BIGGER THAN HIMSELF -USES THE 'WORD'' poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 22:37 -0700
poseurs ominous noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 10:16 -0700
Re: poseurs ominous poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-17 21:12 -0700
Re: poseurs ominous "King Knutsacco" <b.krazy@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-17 21:54 -0700
Re: poseurs ominous poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-18 03:40 -0700
c.o.m.m.u.t.a.t.i.n.g operators (+, x; maybe -, / etc. ad finitum noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 11:01 -0700
Re: c.o.m.m.u.t.a.t.i.n.g operators (+, x; maybe -, / etc. ad finitum poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-19 02:49 -0700
there, so noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 10:03 -0700
Re: there, so poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-20 00:05 -0700
why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 11:22 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-20 11:40 -0700
stop it -- mystreating your keyboard noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 12:39 -0700
Re: stop it -- mystreating your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-20 19:18 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 09:17 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-21 11:14 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 13:23 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-21 22:11 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-22 06:04 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-22 08:53 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-22 07:55 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard "Brian McConnel" <ballunatic@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-22 10:02 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-22 10:50 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-22 13:58 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-22 21:18 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-24 08:55 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-24 07:38 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-24 10:11 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-24 09:54 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-25 07:47 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-25 08:49 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-25 07:34 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-26 03:55 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-26 22:09 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-27 16:13 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-28 00:20 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-28 05:29 -0700
1/37,20,00 seconds per mile (the period of the sphere, or diameter, or reciprocal of curvature noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-28 18:10 -0700
Re: 1/37,20,00 seconds per mile (the period of the sphere, or diameter, or reciprocal of curvature poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-28 22:21 -0700
Re: 1/37,20,00 seconds per mile (the period of the sphere, or diameter, or reciprocal of curvature noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 13:19 -0700
Re: 1/37,20,00 seconds per mile (the period of the sphere, or diameter, or reciprocal of curvature poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-29 20:01 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 16:09 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-01 01:08 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard grahamcooper7@gmail.com - 2016-11-02 03:28 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-02 11:14 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 17:27 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-03 02:22 -0700
your keyboard could sue, you, though, iff noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 14:02 -0700
Re: your keyboard could sue, you, though, iff poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-03 23:54 -0700
Re: your keyboard could sue, you, though, iff noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-04 11:56 -0700
Re: your keyboard could sue, you, though, iff poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-04 23:29 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 14:00 -0600
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 16:06 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 16:12 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 01:27 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 08:13 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 06:46 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 12:36 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 14:15 -0600
be causal noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 21:08 -0800
Re: be causal poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-08 22:17 -0800
Re: be causal noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-09 12:18 -0800
Re: be causal poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-10 02:34 -0800
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-10 23:13 -0800
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 16:55 -0800
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 13:03 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 13:13 -0700
"plonk" -- we know, you are just going to rattle your keyboard; this is my last reply to you noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 16:13 -0700
Re: "plonk" -- we know, you are just going to rattle your keyboard; this is my last reply to you grahamcooper7@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 21:04 -0700
Re: "plonk" -- we know, you are just going to rattle your keyboard; this is my last reply to you poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 22:14 -0700
Re: "plonk" -- we know, you are just going to rattle your keyboard; this is my last reply to you poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 22:11 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 14:13 -0600
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 01:03 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 08:11 -0500
a while hath been noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 12:26 -0700
Re: a while hath been poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 12:41 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-16 10:22 -0800
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 14:17 -0600
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-17 05:26 -0800
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 10:00 -0600
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-17 08:58 -0800
why don't you just think, awhile ... we have plenty of ellipses noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 11:25 -0800
Re: why don't you just think, awhile ... we have plenty of ellipses poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 00:55 -0800
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 11:11 -0800
before mystreatying your keyboard, gAf about permittivity & permeability noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-19 15:29 -0800
Re: before mystreatying your keyboard, gAf about permittivity & permeability poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-20 00:25 -0800
Bodkin knows about permittivity & permeability; po rat is just a typist -- a very bad typist? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-20 13:39 -0800
Re: Bodkin knows about permittivity & permeability; po rat is just a typist -- a very bad typist? poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-21 00:37 -0800
Re: Bodkin knows about permittivity & permeability; po rat is just a typist -- a very bad typist? poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-21 02:54 -0800
bad typist? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 12:04 -0800
Re: Bodkin knows about permittivity & permeability; po rat is just a typist -- a very bad typist? "Alberto Meltdown Jones" <lol_ima_fgt@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 19:37 -0800
Re: Bodkin knows about permittivity & permeability; po rat is just a typist -- a very bad typist? poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-22 01:13 -0800
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-20 14:47 -0600
"HELP," your keyboard screamed, but only Po raT could hear it noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 15:58 -0800
think, awhile, before mystreatying my dumbterinal -- thakyou noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-24 11:58 -0700
Re: think, awhile, before mystreatying my dumbterinal -- thakyou poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-24 21:06 -0700
Re: think, awhile, before mystreatying my dumbterinal -- thakyou noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-27 11:40 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-15 09:12 -0800
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 11:36 -0600
because he just doen't think -- he just l00ks and types at teh same momentbieng noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 12:00 -0800
go read a goddam b00k, you m0r0n noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 11:32 -0700
Re: go read a goddam b00k, you m0r0n poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-21 22:17 -0700
vmv is t.h.a.t noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-23 11:59 -0700
Re: vmv is t.h.a.t poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-24 01:29 -0700
vmv/2 (Liebniz's *vis viva* a.k.a kinetic energy or k.e noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-24 11:55 -0700
Re: vmv/2 (Liebniz's *vis viva* a.k.a kinetic energy or k.e noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 16:57 -0800
Re: vmv/2 (Liebniz's *vis viva* a.k.a kinetic energy or k.e poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-14 22:59 -0800
Re: c.o.m.m.u.t.a.t.i.n.g operators (+, x; maybe -, / etc. ad finitum "Eduardo Grudin" <raving_lunatic@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-19 21:00 -0700
Re: c.o.m.m.u.t.a.t.i.n.g operators (+, x; maybe -, / etc. ad finitum poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-20 00:00 -0700
Re: EVERY MUMBLER THAT WANTS TO POSE BIGGER THAN HIMSELF -USES THE 'WORD'' "Eduardo Space Helmut" <b.karzeddin@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-16 16:49 -0700
Re: EVERY MUMBLER THAT WANTS TO POSE BIGGER THAN HIMSELF -USES THE 'WORD'' poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 22:38 -0700
Re: EVERY MUMBLER THAT WANTS TO POSE BIGGER THAN HIMSELF -USES THE 'WORD'' poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 22:40 -0700
Re: EVERY MUMBLER THAT WANTS TO POSE BIGGER THAN HIMSELF -USES THE 'WORD'' poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-17 04:00 -0700
csiph-web