Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #376673
| From | GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... |
| Date | 2016-10-18 14:08 -0600 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nu5vf0$7m0$8@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <nu3bj9$7an$1@deskrabbit.motzarella.org> <ahjfeu983.3ii@rooftop.invalid> <nu4nu0$jrb$3@deskrabbit.motzarella.org> <hjgaud093.gau44@rooftop.invalid> <nu5biv$qi7$1@deskrabbit.motzarella.org> |
Desk Rabbit wrote: > On 18/10/2016 13:58, deplorable owl wrote: >> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote: >>> On 17/10/2016 21:32, deplorable owl wrote: >>>> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote: >>>>> On 17/10/2016 18:43, fr314159@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>> On Monday, October 17, 2016 at 1:04:46 PM UTC-4, ronb wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> "concept of >>>>>>> self-driving cars" >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The self-driving car is one of the most idiotic ideas to emerge >>>>>> anywhere. >>>>>> >>>>>> There is no way that I would ever allow myself to be transported >>>>>> by such a self-driving vehicle. >>>>>> >>>>>> My approach to driving is simple. I never allow my car, and with >>>>>> it my body, to move into an area where my eyes haven't already been >>>>>> 10 seconds previously. This is known as "anticipatory" or "defensive" >>>>>> driving, and a self-driving vehicle could not ever accomplish the same. >>>>> >>>>> All round radar, distance sensors have a far better idea of what's going >>>>> on than your feeble brain could take in. Have you never driven an E >>>>> Class Mercedes with DISTRONIC? Oh silly me, you are a Linux user, you >>>>> can probably only afford a bike. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Especially in moderate to heavy traffic, a self-driving car could >>>>>> not scan the road thousands or even hundreds of feet ahead. As a >>>>>> result a self-driving vehicle would be limited to impulsive accelerations >>>>>> and very quick braking. The short reaction times, in addition to >>>>>> causing excessive wear and tear, could be fatally dangerous. >>>>> >>>>> Except of course if there were more than one car in which case they >>>>> could communicate and share traffic data. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> But self-driving cars are another great techno-gimmick and that's >>>>>> all that matters to the marketdroids that run most corporations. >>>>>> >>>>> Translation: They are rubbish because I'll never be able to afford to >>>>> own one. >>>>> >>>>> Self driving cars are the future. They are already being trialled in a >>>>> city near me, I'm looking forward to trying one. >>>>> >>>> >>>> It is not the future in the US, because the people will not allow it. >>>> It will be child's play for any politician to campaign against such >>>> lunacy, and the end result will be that no state in the US will permit >>>> driverless cars. >>> >>> The US is already turning into a backward, bigoted and insular country. >> >> >> What does that fantasy have to do with driverless cars? >> >> >>> If Trump gets in (God forbid), it will just get worse. >>> >> >> When Trump gets in. >> >>> >>>> Now the military will of course have this tech, because it makes sense >>>> to have supply vehicles that don't expose humans to IED dangers, as well >>>> as drone tanks, robot soldiers, etc. And that is the whole point of >>>> this type of research. >>> >>> They already have much of this tech fool. The battlefield and the >>> highway are entirely different. >>> >> >> Battlefields make use of highways, moron. War takes place in the real >> world, not some fold-out game board. There will never be driverless >> cars on American highways. Maybe over there on Loon Island you tards >> will have them. You already drive on the wrong side of the road after >> all. >> > > ROFL! Clearly you have never seen a war zone outside of the cinema. Were you in the military?
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
No Apple Cars afterall ... ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 17:04 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-17 17:33 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-17 17:56 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-17 18:46 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-10-17 10:43 -0700
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-17 21:17 +0100
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-17 20:32 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-17 17:22 -0600
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-18 09:53 +0100
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-18 12:58 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-18 15:29 +0100
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-18 14:54 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-18 16:02 +0100
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-18 15:10 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-18 16:20 +0100
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-18 15:34 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-18 16:40 +0100
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-18 15:54 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 11:41 -0700
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-19 15:52 +0100
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 11:39 -0700
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-18 14:08 -0600
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-19 15:53 +0100
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-19 14:04 -0600
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-20 11:58 -0400
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-20 17:32 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-20 12:30 -0600
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-21 02:31 -0700
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-21 12:49 -0600
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-28 09:58 -0400
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-28 15:24 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-29 09:19 -0400
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-29 16:04 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-29 16:40 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Godzilla <godzilla@lizardboss.invalid> - 2016-10-29 16:57 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-30 09:44 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-29 17:09 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-29 13:27 -0400
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-30 09:45 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-30 07:08 -0400
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-30 14:18 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-30 12:49 -0400
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-30 18:47 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-31 09:16 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-31 05:38 -0400
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-31 10:41 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-31 12:30 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 11:42 -0700
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-31 21:49 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-31 08:51 -0500
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 11:56 -0700
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-29 16:27 -0400
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-30 09:48 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-30 09:51 -0400
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-30 14:22 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-30 10:28 -0400
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-31 09:14 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-29 22:15 +0100
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-30 09:49 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-28 15:37 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-18 14:07 -0600
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-10-18 14:12 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-18 09:16 -0500
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-18 15:30 +0100
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-18 16:49 +0200
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-18 06:59 -0500
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-18 08:00 -0400
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-19 13:00 -0400
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-19 20:30 +0200
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 18:45 +0000
Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-01 09:44 -0700
csiph-web