Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #376673

Re: No Apple Cars afterall ...

From GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: No Apple Cars afterall ...
Date 2016-10-18 14:08 -0600
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <nu5vf0$7m0$8@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <nu3bj9$7an$1@deskrabbit.motzarella.org> <ahjfeu983.3ii@rooftop.invalid> <nu4nu0$jrb$3@deskrabbit.motzarella.org> <hjgaud093.gau44@rooftop.invalid> <nu5biv$qi7$1@deskrabbit.motzarella.org>

Show all headers | View raw


Desk Rabbit wrote:

> On 18/10/2016 13:58, deplorable owl wrote:
>> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote:
>>> On 17/10/2016 21:32, deplorable owl wrote:
>>>> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 17/10/2016 18:43, fr314159@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> On Monday, October 17, 2016 at 1:04:46 PM UTC-4, ronb wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  "concept of
>>>>>>> self-driving cars"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The self-driving car is one of the most idiotic ideas to emerge
>>>>>> anywhere.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is no way that I would ever allow myself to be transported
>>>>>> by such a self-driving vehicle.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My approach to driving is simple.  I never allow my car, and with
>>>>>> it my body, to move into an area where my eyes haven't already been
>>>>>> 10 seconds previously.  This is known as "anticipatory" or "defensive"
>>>>>> driving, and a self-driving vehicle could not ever accomplish the same.
>>>>>
>>>>> All round radar, distance sensors have a far better idea of what's going
>>>>> on than your feeble brain could take in. Have you never driven an E
>>>>> Class Mercedes with DISTRONIC? Oh silly me, you are a Linux user, you
>>>>> can probably only afford a bike.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Especially in moderate to heavy traffic, a self-driving car could
>>>>>> not scan the road thousands or even hundreds of feet ahead.  As a
>>>>>> result a self-driving vehicle would be limited to impulsive accelerations
>>>>>> and very quick braking.  The short reaction times, in addition to
>>>>>> causing excessive wear and tear, could be fatally dangerous.
>>>>>
>>>>> Except of course if there were more than one car in which case they
>>>>> could communicate and share traffic data.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But self-driving cars are another great techno-gimmick and that's
>>>>>> all that matters to the marketdroids that run most corporations.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Translation: They are rubbish because I'll never be able to afford to
>>>>> own one.
>>>>>
>>>>> Self driving cars are the future. They are already being trialled in a
>>>>> city near me, I'm looking forward to trying one.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It is not the future in the US, because the people will not allow it.
>>>> It will be child's play for any politician to campaign against such
>>>> lunacy, and the end result will be that no state in the US will permit
>>>> driverless cars.
>>>
>>> The US is already turning into a backward, bigoted and insular country.
>> 
>> 
>> What does that fantasy have to do with driverless cars?
>> 
>> 
>>> If Trump gets in (God forbid), it will just get worse.
>>>
>> 
>> When Trump gets in.
>> 
>>>
>>>> Now the military will of course have this tech, because it makes sense
>>>> to have supply vehicles that don't expose humans to IED dangers, as well
>>>> as drone tanks, robot soldiers, etc.  And that is the whole point of
>>>> this type of research.
>>>
>>> They already have much of this tech fool. The battlefield and the
>>> highway are entirely different.
>>>
>> 
>> Battlefields make use of highways, moron.  War takes place in the real
>> world, not some fold-out game board.  There will never be driverless
>> cars on American highways.  Maybe over there on Loon Island you tards
>> will have them.  You already drive on the wrong side of the road after
>> all.
>> 
> 
> ROFL! Clearly you have never seen a war zone outside of the cinema.

Were you in the military?

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

No Apple Cars afterall ... ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 17:04 +0000
  Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-17 17:33 +0000
    Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-17 17:56 +0000
      Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-17 18:46 +0000
  Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-10-17 10:43 -0700
    Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-17 21:17 +0100
      Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-17 20:32 +0000
        Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-17 17:22 -0600
        Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-18 09:53 +0100
          Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-18 12:58 +0000
            Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-18 15:29 +0100
              Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-18 14:54 +0000
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-18 16:02 +0100
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-18 15:10 +0000
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-18 16:20 +0100
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-18 15:34 +0000
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-18 16:40 +0100
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-18 15:54 +0000
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 11:41 -0700
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-19 15:52 +0100
              Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 11:39 -0700
              Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-18 14:08 -0600
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-19 15:53 +0100
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-19 14:04 -0600
            Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-20 11:58 -0400
              Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-20 17:32 +0000
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-20 12:30 -0600
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-21 02:31 -0700
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-21 12:49 -0600
              Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-28 09:58 -0400
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-28 15:24 +0000
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-29 09:19 -0400
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-29 16:04 +0000
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-29 16:40 +0000
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Godzilla <godzilla@lizardboss.invalid> - 2016-10-29 16:57 +0000
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-30 09:44 +0000
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-29 17:09 +0000
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-29 13:27 -0400
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-30 09:45 +0000
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-30 07:08 -0400
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-30 14:18 +0000
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-30 12:49 -0400
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-30 18:47 +0000
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-31 09:16 +0000
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-31 05:38 -0400
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-31 10:41 +0000
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-31 12:30 +0000
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 11:42 -0700
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-31 21:49 +0000
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-31 08:51 -0500
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 11:56 -0700
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-29 16:27 -0400
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-30 09:48 +0000
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-30 09:51 -0400
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-30 14:22 +0000
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-30 10:28 -0400
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-31 09:14 +0000
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-29 22:15 +0100
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-30 09:49 +0000
                Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-28 15:37 +0000
          Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-18 14:07 -0600
      Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-10-18 14:12 +0000
        Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-18 09:16 -0500
        Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-18 15:30 +0100
        Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-18 16:49 +0200
  Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-18 06:59 -0500
    Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-18 08:00 -0400
  Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-19 13:00 -0400
    Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-19 20:30 +0200
      Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 18:45 +0000
  Re: No Apple Cars afterall ... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-01 09:44 -0700

csiph-web