Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #601243
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Preliminary page, Page21, 3-6, Experiment proof that EM is attraction force only, and any alleged repelling is denial of same space occupancy |
| Date | 2016-10-17 14:58 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nu2hsc$3h9$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <92b46a02-f893-479b-bc4d-37069c8dbf7e@googlegroups.com> <ntvtkh$1pf$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
> On 10/16/2016 3:15 AM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: >> Meaning: meaning that EM is attract only. Real meaning of the above is that the A-bomb does not exist, as there is no repulsion force competing with strong interaction.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Preliminary page, Page21, 3-6, Experiment proof that EM is attraction force only, and any alleged repelling is denial of same space occupancy Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 00:15 -0700
Re: Preliminary page, Page21, 3-6, Experiment proof that EM is attraction force only, and any alleged repelling is denial of same space occupancy "Anon Y. Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid> - 2016-10-16 09:04 -0400
A minded physicist versus B mind //Experiment proof that EM is attraction force only, and any alleged repelling is denial of same space occupancy Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 13:46 -0700
Re: A minded physicist versus B mind //Experiment proof that EM is attraction force only, and any alleged repelling is denial of same space occupancy "Anon Y. Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid> - 2016-10-17 00:16 -0400
exclusion principle: no same space occupancy noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 10:09 -0700
Re: Preliminary page, Page21, 3-6, Experiment proof that EM is attraction force only, and any alleged repelling is denial of same space occupancy Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 14:58 +0200
turning stupid physics professors into a bit more smart//EM is attraction force only, and any alleged repelling is denial of same space occupancy Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 14:14 -0700
Re: turning stupid physics professors into a bit more smart//EM is attraction force only, and any alleged repelling is denial of same space occupancy Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 20:16 -0700
Re: turning stupid physics professors into a bit more smart//EM is attraction force only, and any alleged repelling is denial of same space occupancy "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-17 07:34 +0200
UIUC physics asking for more information Re: turning stupid physics professors into a bit more smart// Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 00:02 -0700
Re: UIUC physics asking for more information Re: turning stupid physics professors into a bit more smart// noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 11:03 -0700
Re: turning stupid physics professors into a bit more smart//EM is attraction force only, and any alleged repelling is denial of same space occupancy Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 13:13 -0700
Re: turning stupid physics professors into a bit more smart//EM is attraction force only, and any alleged repelling is denial of same space occupancy Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 13:48 -0700
Re: turning stupid physics professors into a bit more smart//EM is attraction force only, and any alleged repelling is denial of same space occupancy noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 14:58 -0700
csiph-web