Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #601087

Re: Preliminary page, Page21, 3-6, Experiment proof that EM is attraction force only, and any alleged repelling is denial of same space occupancy

From "Anon Y. Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Preliminary page, Page21, 3-6, Experiment proof that EM is attraction force only, and any alleged repelling is denial of same space occupancy
Date 2016-10-16 09:04 -0400
Organization None
Message-ID <ntvtkh$1pf$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <92b46a02-f893-479b-bc4d-37069c8dbf7e@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 10/16/2016 3:15 AM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Was there some sort of experiment that could have taken place in 1860
> so that Maxwell would have proven EM is just attraction only?
>
> Well, I suppose if someone or anyone carried a box of magnets to Maxwell
> Lab and tried to arrange them in any manner or fashion possible to arrange,
> that the magnets always come out in a configuration of "stuck together".
> And never a situation where the magnets repelled and further distanced
> themselves. Never was the case where you had magnets and they separated.
> Meaning: meaning that EM is attract only.

Poor example. Magnets are dipoles so to any magnetic pole, every other 
magnet in the universe has an attractive end and a repulsive end. If 
that someone carried a box of positive electric charges to Maxwell, they 
would always be in a situation where they were as far as possible from 
each other due to repulsion.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Preliminary page, Page21, 3-6, Experiment proof that EM is attraction force only, and any alleged repelling is denial of same space occupancy Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 00:15 -0700
  Re: Preliminary page, Page21, 3-6, Experiment proof that EM is attraction force only, and any alleged repelling is denial of same space occupancy "Anon Y. Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid> - 2016-10-16 09:04 -0400
    A minded physicist versus B mind //Experiment proof that EM is attraction force only, and any alleged repelling is denial of same space occupancy Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 13:46 -0700
      Re: A minded physicist versus B mind //Experiment proof that EM is attraction force only, and any alleged repelling is denial of same space occupancy "Anon Y. Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid> - 2016-10-17 00:16 -0400
        exclusion principle: no same space occupancy noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 10:09 -0700
    Re: Preliminary page, Page21, 3-6, Experiment proof that EM is attraction force only, and any alleged repelling is denial of same space occupancy Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 14:58 +0200
  turning stupid physics professors into a bit more smart//EM is attraction force only, and any alleged repelling is denial of same space occupancy Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 14:14 -0700
    Re: turning stupid physics professors into a bit more smart//EM is attraction force only, and any alleged repelling is denial of same space occupancy Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 20:16 -0700
      Re: turning stupid physics professors into a bit more smart//EM is attraction force only, and any alleged repelling is denial of same space occupancy "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-17 07:34 +0200
        UIUC physics asking for more information Re: turning stupid physics professors into a bit more smart// Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 00:02 -0700
          Re: UIUC physics asking for more information Re: turning stupid physics professors into a bit more smart// noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 11:03 -0700
      Re: turning stupid physics professors into a bit more smart//EM is attraction force only, and any alleged repelling is denial of same space occupancy Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 13:13 -0700
        Re: turning stupid physics professors into a bit more smart//EM is attraction force only, and any alleged repelling is denial of same space occupancy Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 13:48 -0700
          Re: turning stupid physics professors into a bit more smart//EM is attraction force only, and any alleged repelling is denial of same space occupancy noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 14:58 -0700

csiph-web