Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #600802
| From | Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says |
| Date | 2016-10-13 20:35 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <ntpcq7$1172$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <a9b866e3-05f3-424a-9f09-2a894f5b1578@googlegroups.com> <8dricd-5f8.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <7778f934-4266-4ec3-a07e-0064847619b3@googlegroups.com> <91ovcd-5ll.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <1542f992-49e4-4df6-ac03-641f66144d85@googlegroups.com> |
On 10/13/2016 10:47 AM, edprochak@gmail.com wrote: > On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 at 2:46:06 PM UTC-4, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> edprochak@gmail.com wrote: >>> On Thursday, October 6, 2016 at 5:16:04 PM UTC-4, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> edprochak@gmail.com wrote: >>> [] >>>>> I SAID : VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV >>>>>>>> I'll have to look more into the plans for energy production. >>>>> >>>>> How many times do you have to ask the same question? >>>> >>>> Likely until you provide a rational answer. >>>> >>>> The solar irradiance on Mars on average is about half that of Earth >>>> when there are no dust storms, and there are lots of dust storms. >>> >>> So there may be possibility for wind power. Thin atmosphere, but >>> how much power could be converted? something to consider. all options >>> should be checked. >> >> How much can be converted you ask? >> >> The same as anywhere else, about 30% of whatever is available, but >> since the atmosphere is so thin, there is little available. > > okay, you argue against solar on mars because of > "lots of dust storms." that is what stops the Rover for months which is on Mars and solar powered > but then argue against wind power > because "the atmosphere is so thin". it is only 1% of earth, not enough mass blowing to really generate a lot of power, and does Mars have strong prevailing winds ? think not. > > Actually I am arguing that they might be able to harness > both forms of power. just as we need to do here. they need power at night, and when the wind is blowing, so they must use a nuk. no need for wind power. some solar may help but dust is a big problem, how do you clean it with out water or personel or scratching it ? > >> >>>> The only way to provide the enormous amount of power needed to turn >>>> dirt and rocks into anything useful can only be supplied by several >>>> nuclear reactors. >>> >>> I'm sure that is not the only way, but I agree Nuclear would be a big >>> source. >> >> If you are so sure, name it. > > Wind, solar. Boy you have very short term memory. nope, they sound good, but not enough power during night. and wind is too wimpy >>> >>> Maybe they can develop the technology for the Mars colony, then we get >>> the benefit of the research for plants here on earth. >> >> Fine. This just means you have to transport everything from Earth. > > So did you read the Musk plan at all? yep, most all daydreams wo the engineering, no cost constraints > >> >>> IF it turns out there is not enough water, maybe direct conversion >>> with thermal electric generators can be done. And then the "waste heat" >>> can also be piped around the colony for room heating and such. >> >> The typical efficiency of thermal electric generators is around 5-8%. > > Yes, so? You are connecting them to a nuclear plant. LOTS of heat > available. > >> >> Piping heat anywhere, whether for heating or just dumpling it requires >> a transport medium such as water. > > What is it with the water fascination with you? > You never had a house with forced hot air for heating? it is mass, the mass of the water carrys far more heat than air, higher effeciency, etc. Humans require a lot of water. >> >>> Regarding the water, the space station shows that recycling water >>> works. So It would be interesting to calculate how much water would >>> really be needed per person. Clearly a lot less that what is used >>> by we Americans per person. I know of a company working on home >>> based recycling of water (for homes in drought affected areas). >> >> So where is this water recyling plant going to come from other >> than Earth? >> >> One more huge, heavy, expensive thing that needs to be transported. > > maybe the first few. Later they will make their own. > Again, did you not read the plan? old news, space station has it > >> >> No one is going to be watering a lawn on Mars. >> >> They do not wash anything on the space station; they send dirty stuff >> back to Earth and send up clean stuff on a regular basis. > > Space station does not have the room. Mars will have room > for washing machines. Maybe not even water based. (ever had > your suit dry cleaned?) dry cleaning is with fluids, they used to use carbontet, but that causes cancer. I saw a film from the early 50;s of people walking down into a pool of carbontet, and back out again, all their clothes were cleaned. but you cant have an air polutant on the station, therefore no dry cleaning. >> >>> The problems can be solved. and the benefits will come back to us. >> >> Sure the problems can be solved by sending huge amounts of stuff to >> Mars on a regular basis. What benefit does that have to the taxpayers >> funding all this? >> > The colonists devise new ways of making things work with the resources > available on Mars. We then can do some of the same things here. > We will benefit. arizona, austrailia will benifit, they are full of rocks and sand. > >> >> Like what exactly? Collect everyone's shit, dry it on the near >> vacuum surface and burn it in a steam boiler? Oops, no oxygen >> to burn anything and no water for the boiler. > > Again the SHORT TERM memory is failing you. Molten Salt Reactors. > I even mentioned it again on the line below. just above you sig: there are safer reactors, they would probably just scale up one like the use to power deep spacecraft, radioactive stuff heats up therompiles. ultra reliable, lasts long time. >> >>> (Interesting too. I may just have to read more about MSR.) >>> >>> Have a nice day. >> >> -- >> Jim Pennino > > (like talking to a two year old.) > two is bettr than a three year old!
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-11 06:33 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-11 18:35 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-11 14:30 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-13 08:47 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-13 10:31 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-13 20:37 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-13 18:49 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-13 21:53 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-13 22:40 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-14 10:49 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-13 23:42 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-13 20:35 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-14 08:36 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-14 17:59 +0000
csiph-web