Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #600549

Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time

From Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time
Date 2016-10-12 07:34 +0200
Organization Good company
Message-ID <ntki0d$qno$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <285ece24c8d601e3fd9d950f6ff618df@dizum.com> <nthsim$ngb$1@dont-email.me> <nthsrc$ngb$2@dont-email.me> <1a2606f4d06f2332678b604a8d3d326e@dizum.com> <ntkdh0$h5c$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


Dne 12/10/2016 v 06:17 Poutnik napsal(a):
> Dne 12/10/2016 v 06:07 Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus,
> DoW #1 napsal(a):
>>
>> But cloth doesn't convect upward like CO2 does, now does it? Or are
>> you going to jump on the McGinn TardWagon and try to claim that
>> convection doesn't exist? LOL
> 
> No, I just claim you do not understand the role of convention
> in external Earth energy balance.
> 
> I quote just nonsenses I comment, not the ones I do not.
> 
P.S:

Earth is lucky to have cooling gases as water vapour a CO2.

As these shield the superior cooling effect of Earth surface,
that has about by 1/3 higher absolute temperature,
with emission proportional to T^4.


-- 
Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer )
Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 12:12 -0700
  Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-10 05:01 +0200
    Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-10 07:28 +0200
      Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-11 04:44 +0200
        Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 06:02 +0200
          Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-11 07:03 +0200
            Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 07:16 +0200
              Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 07:21 +0200
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-12 06:07 +0200
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 06:17 +0200
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 07:34 +0200
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-13 06:58 +0200
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-12 07:52 +0200
              Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-11 08:43 -0500
                combustion, vapor of that noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 12:42 -0700
                Re: combustion, vapor of that Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 02:48 +0200
              Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-12 07:36 +0200
                tardo-nado noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 11:39 -0700
            Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time THE STINGER <bzz.bzz.bzz@sting.sting.sting> - 2016-10-11 08:55 +0200

csiph-web