Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #600549
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time |
| Date | 2016-10-12 07:34 +0200 |
| Organization | Good company |
| Message-ID | <ntki0d$qno$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <285ece24c8d601e3fd9d950f6ff618df@dizum.com> <nthsim$ngb$1@dont-email.me> <nthsrc$ngb$2@dont-email.me> <1a2606f4d06f2332678b604a8d3d326e@dizum.com> <ntkdh0$h5c$1@dont-email.me> |
Dne 12/10/2016 v 06:17 Poutnik napsal(a): > Dne 12/10/2016 v 06:07 Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, > DoW #1 napsal(a): >> >> But cloth doesn't convect upward like CO2 does, now does it? Or are >> you going to jump on the McGinn TardWagon and try to claim that >> convection doesn't exist? LOL > > No, I just claim you do not understand the role of convention > in external Earth energy balance. > > I quote just nonsenses I comment, not the ones I do not. > P.S: Earth is lucky to have cooling gases as water vapour a CO2. As these shield the superior cooling effect of Earth surface, that has about by 1/3 higher absolute temperature, with emission proportional to T^4. -- Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 12:12 -0700
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-10 05:01 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-10 07:28 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-11 04:44 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 06:02 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-11 07:03 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 07:16 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 07:21 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-12 06:07 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 06:17 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 07:34 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-13 06:58 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-12 07:52 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-11 08:43 -0500
combustion, vapor of that noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 12:42 -0700
Re: combustion, vapor of that Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 02:48 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-12 07:36 +0200
tardo-nado noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 11:39 -0700
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time THE STINGER <bzz.bzz.bzz@sting.sting.sting> - 2016-10-11 08:55 +0200
csiph-web