Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #375419
| From | Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No |
| Date | 2016-10-07 14:36 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nt88c3$bri$2@deskrabbit.motzarella.org> (permalink) |
| References | <6ab9d2e3-fc14-4127-ad37-581fac9e7591@googlegroups.com> <57F6F95A.2030906@smartchat.net.au> |
On 07/10/2016 02:24, Ron House wrote: > On 06/10/16 05:21, fr314159@gmail.com wrote: >> What happens when something goes wrong on ones OS? >> >> There should be no problem. Just call up the documentation. >> >> GNU/Linux is very well documented. Every software package >> has ample manual, or man, pages as well as "info" pages. >> >> The comprehensive information contained therein is always on a >> professional level, and they are all available locally, that is, >> they are stored on local disk drives. Finding the necessary information >> is quick and easy. >> >> What about Microshit? >> >> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! There is NO local documentation. None. >> Zip. Nada. >> > > Basically right, but you are over-reaching. Not all linux s'ware has > good docs. They're written by so many different groups and individuals, > some committed to docs, some not so much. > > As for M$, might I first suggest you use a less vulgar insult than > Micros**t? You turn people off, many who would otherwise send your posts > to friends etc., where they might actually persuade people, won't do so. > Examples of better insults: "M$", "Windoze". Better not to use such childish language and be grown up and professional. > But your point is right. A classic from M$ from way back was the help in > the printed DOS manual that said something like: "If your hard drive > fails, see the help in <name-of-a-file-on-the-failed-hd>." How did > anyone write that and not see the problem? I guess they assumed that users might have enough common sense to go and look on another working machine? Much the same way that Linux's hard disk based documentation on fixing a broken file system is useful on the broken system.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-10-05 12:21 -0700
Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-06 10:15 +0100
Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No Ron House <rhouse@smartchat.net.au> - 2016-10-07 11:24 +1000
Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-07 14:36 +0100
Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-10-07 07:36 -0700
Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-10-07 08:00 -0700
Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No Ron House <rhouse@smartchat.net.au> - 2016-10-08 13:03 +1000
Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-10 11:03 +0100
Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-10 12:20 +0200
Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-10 12:43 +0100
Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-10 07:40 -0500
Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-10 11:02 +0100
Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No Ron House <rhouse@smartchat.net.au> - 2016-10-08 13:00 +1000
Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-10 11:06 +0100
csiph-web