Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #375419

Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No

From Desk Rabbit <me@example.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No
Date 2016-10-07 14:36 +0100
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <nt88c3$bri$2@deskrabbit.motzarella.org> (permalink)
References <6ab9d2e3-fc14-4127-ad37-581fac9e7591@googlegroups.com> <57F6F95A.2030906@smartchat.net.au>

Show all headers | View raw


On 07/10/2016 02:24, Ron House wrote:
> On 06/10/16 05:21, fr314159@gmail.com wrote:
>> What happens when something goes wrong on ones OS?
>>
>> There should be no problem.  Just call up the documentation.
>>
>> GNU/Linux is very well documented.  Every software package
>> has ample manual, or man, pages as well as "info" pages.
>>
>> The comprehensive information contained therein is always on a
>> professional level, and they are all available locally, that is,
>> they are stored on local disk drives.  Finding the necessary information
>> is quick and easy.
>>
>> What about Microshit?
>>
>> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!  There is NO local documentation.  None.
>> Zip.  Nada.
>>
> 
> Basically right, but you are over-reaching. Not all linux s'ware has
> good docs. They're written by so many different groups and individuals,
> some committed to docs, some not so much.
> 
> As for M$, might I first suggest you use a less vulgar insult than
> Micros**t? You turn people off, many who would otherwise send your posts
> to friends etc., where they might actually persuade people, won't do so.
> Examples of better insults: "M$", "Windoze".

Better not to use such childish language and be grown up and professional.


> But your point is right. A classic from M$ from way back was the help in
> the printed DOS manual that said something like: "If your hard drive
> fails, see the help in <name-of-a-file-on-the-failed-hd>." How did
> anyone write that and not see the problem?

I guess they assumed that users might have enough common sense to go and
look on another working machine? Much the same way that Linux's hard
disk based documentation on fixing a broken file system is useful on the
broken system.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-10-05 12:21 -0700
  Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-06 10:15 +0100
  Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No Ron House <rhouse@smartchat.net.au> - 2016-10-07 11:24 +1000
    Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-07 14:36 +0100
      Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-10-07 07:36 -0700
      Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-10-07 08:00 -0700
        Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No Ron House <rhouse@smartchat.net.au> - 2016-10-08 13:03 +1000
          Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-10 11:03 +0100
            Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-10 12:20 +0200
              Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-10 12:43 +0100
          Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-10 07:40 -0500
        Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-10 11:02 +0100
      Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No Ron House <rhouse@smartchat.net.au> - 2016-10-08 13:00 +1000
        Re: Documentation: GNU/Linux Yes; Microshit No Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-10 11:06 +0100

csiph-web