Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #599759
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Particle physics |
| Date | 2016-10-06 16:15 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <nt6etf$13a9$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (19 earlier) <f1dafa8e-3a8c-4440-b38e-86f91bf9cde9@googlegroups.com> <nt5uv3$ba$1@gioia.aioe.org> <e203a7be-557f-470e-8b35-edf7ceb6d5d6@googlegroups.com> <nt62uj$btv$2@gioia.aioe.org> <dceacb42-750d-49f2-a52f-59b71ea2bf2a@googlegroups.com> |
On 10/6/2016 2:59 PM, john wrote: > Exactly, Odd. > QM has zero predictive power. Bullshit, John. Where the fuck did you get that idea? > > Predictions are stuff like, > Jupiter has a crust, > and > galaxies precess. I don't think you know what a scientific prediction is, John. Newton's gravity telling people exactly WHERE (quantitative azimuth and altitude) to find the previously unobserved planet Neptune was a prediction. Pauli and Fermi predicting the existence of a neutrino, and that if you have a source like a nuclear reactor that should produce the neutrinos (if they exist) at a rate of 50 trillion neutrinos per second per square centimeter, and that flux is impinging on 200 liters of water, then you should see about 3 neutrino+proton interactions per hour -- that's a prediction. Gell-Mann predicting that if the quark model is correct, then you should see a particle (not yet found) with mass about 1680 MeV, with specified lifetime and decay products, which was later found exactly where predicted -- that's a prediction. Einstein predicting exactly HOW MUCH that light will be red-shifted if it is radiated from the ground and detected 22.6 meters higher in the Earth's gravitational field, and that being exactly the amount of shift seen at the Jefferson Lab when experimenters set it up -- that's a prediction. > > Right right? > -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 15:52 -0500
Re: Particle physics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-02 00:09 +0200
Re: Particle physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 07:33 +0200
Re: Particle physics poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-04 08:44 -0700
Re: Particle physics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-05 10:15 +0200
Re: Particle physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 17:14 +0200
Re: Particle physics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-05 17:21 +0200
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 09:03 -0700
Re: Particle physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 19:43 +0200
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 13:12 -0500
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 18:04 -0700
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 09:00 -0500
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 07:20 -0700
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 09:49 -0500
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 08:11 -0700
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 10:41 -0500
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 09:21 -0700
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 11:43 -0500
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 10:25 -0700
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 12:51 -0500
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 12:59 -0700
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 16:15 -0500
Re: Particle physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 23:41 +0200
Re: Particle physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 23:45 +0200
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 17:11 -0500
Re: Particle physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 07:14 +0200
Re: Particle physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 07:20 +0200
Re: Particle physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 07:59 +0200
Re: Particle physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-07 00:50 +0000
Re: Particle physics edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-13 07:47 -0700
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-13 08:18 -0700
Re: Particle physics edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-13 10:21 -0700
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-13 10:44 -0700
Re: Particle physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-13 18:26 +0000
Re: Particle physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-07 00:40 +0000
Re: Particle physics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 04:31 -0700
Re: Particle physics poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-06 22:56 -0700
Re: Particle physics poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-05 23:30 -0700
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 13:00 -0500
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 17:21 -0700
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 07:28 -0500
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 06:00 -0700
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 06:47 -0700
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 07:16 -0700
Re: Particle physics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 07:40 -0700
Re: Particle physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-04 19:05 -0400
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 09:53 -0500
Re: Particle physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-04 14:47 +0000
Re: Particle physics poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-04 08:58 -0700
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 09:53 -0500
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 08:51 -0700
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 11:14 -0500
Re: Particle physics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-06 04:04 +0200
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 09:53 -0500
Re: Particle physics poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-04 08:51 -0700
Re: Particle physics rockbrentwood@gmail.com - 2016-10-07 10:22 -0700
Re: Particle physics poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-04 08:41 -0700
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 10:59 -0500
Re: Particle physics poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-04 11:10 -0700
Re: Particle physics poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-04 08:48 -0700
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 11:12 -0500
Re: Particle physics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-05 10:28 +0200
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 07:21 -0500
Re: Particle physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 18:47 +0200
Re: Particle physics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-10 13:31 +0100
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-10 05:53 -0700
Re: Particle physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-10 07:43 -0700
Re: Particle physics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-10 13:22 +0100
csiph-web