Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #94360

Re: When parameters to printf are in memory

Show all headers | View raw

On 01/10/2016 09:08, James Harris wrote:

> I started down this road basically thinking to use snprintf as an easy
> way to plug rendered values into an error message. After all, it's built
> for just such an operation. And it is usually easier to use a built-in
> facility than writing one from scratch.


I think using the a printf-style format string, while it may be 
attractive and familiar, is causing issues.

Perhaps use a different approach. For example, start with what you had:

   struct {
     char *text;         // "Error on line %04d in file \"%s\"\n"
     union any parms[];  // ({int}428, {char*}"file.c")
   };

The {int} etc indicate the implied type of the value in each union.

Now move the detailed formats to the unions (effectively, tag each union 
with the type of its value):

   struct {
     char *text;         // "Error on line # in file \"#\"\n"
     union any parms[];  // (("%04d",428), ("%s","file.c"))
   };

Here, I use "#" in the format string to make it very easy to scan. But a 
manual scan /is/ needed, and a printf-family function called separately 
for each individual item in the list. I don't think the scanning 
function needs to know or decipher the type - just pass the format, and 
the 64-bit union value, as they are.

The text in between and around the #s can be output by any means. ("%" 
can be used for this purpose, "#" was just to highlight the difference.)

To output an actual "#", then "##" could be used, or an ordinary single 
"#" that refers to a string "#" in the union array.

Alternatively, a parallel format array can be used to contain the format 
info:

   struct {
     char *text;         // "Error on line # in file \"#\"\n"
     char* formats[];  // ("%04d","%s")
     union any parms[];  // ({int}428, {char*}"file.c")
   };

(This can also solve the problem of codes such as "%.*s" as parms[] can 
then have extra elements (but end up being longer and out of step 
compared with formats[].)

(The above struct is probably not valid. You will either need bounded 
arrays in there, or pointers to array data stored elsewhere. However 
this is just an example.)

-- 
Bartc

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

When parameters to printf are in memory James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 16:20 +0100
  Re: When parameters to printf are in memory James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 16:43 +0100
    Re: When parameters to printf are in memory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-09-29 20:30 +0100
    Re: When parameters to printf are in memory James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 21:23 +0100
    Re: When parameters to printf are in memory BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-09-29 22:03 +0100
      Re: When parameters to printf are in memory James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 22:35 +0100
        Re: When parameters to printf are in memory BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-09-29 23:11 +0100
          Re: When parameters to printf are in memory James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 19:53 +0100
            Re: When parameters to printf are in memory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-09-30 20:53 +0100
              Re: When parameters to printf are in memory James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 09:08 +0100
                Re: When parameters to printf are in memory BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-10-01 11:15 +0100
                Re: When parameters to printf are in memory James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 08:32 +0100
                Re: When parameters to printf are in memory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-10-01 11:15 +0100
                Re: When parameters to printf are in memory James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 08:28 +0100
                Re: When parameters to printf are in memory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-10-04 09:49 +0100
                Re: When parameters to printf are in memory BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-10-04 11:43 +0100
                Re: When parameters to printf are in memory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-10-04 13:42 +0100
                Re: When parameters to printf are in memory BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-10-04 14:03 +0100
                Re: When parameters to printf are in memory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-10-04 14:16 +0100
                Re: When parameters to printf are in memory James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 20:01 +0100
                Re: When parameters to printf are in memory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-10-04 20:24 +0100
                Re: When parameters to printf are in memory James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 20:40 +0100
                Re: When parameters to printf are in memory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-10-04 22:51 +0100
            Re: When parameters to printf are in memory "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2016-10-04 14:25 -0400
              Re: When parameters to printf are in memory James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 20:31 +0100
  Re: When parameters to printf are in memory BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-09-29 17:03 +0100
    Re: When parameters to printf are in memory gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-09-30 12:20 +0000
      Re: When parameters to printf are in memory Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-09-30 05:55 -0700
      Re: When parameters to printf are in memory James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 20:06 +0100
        Re: When parameters to printf are in memory gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-09-30 22:01 +0000
          Re: When parameters to printf are in memory James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 09:15 +0100
        Re: When parameters to printf are in memory Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-09-30 23:18 -0700
          Re: When parameters to printf are in memory James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 09:32 +0100
  Re: When parameters to printf are in memory jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-09-29 18:35 +0200
    Re: When parameters to printf are in memory James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 19:55 +0100
      Re: When parameters to printf are in memory jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-09-29 21:22 +0200
  Re: When parameters to printf are in memory Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2016-09-29 11:20 -0700
    Re: When parameters to printf are in memory James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 20:08 +0100
  Re: When parameters to printf are in memory Lőrinczy Zsigmond <nospam@for.me> - 2016-10-02 20:15 +0200
    Re: When parameters to printf are in memory Lőrinczy Zsigmond <nospam@for.me> - 2016-10-02 20:19 +0200
      Re: When parameters to printf are in memory gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-10-02 18:29 +0000
        Re: When parameters to printf are in memory Lőrinczy Zsigmond <nospam@for.me> - 2016-10-03 07:04 +0200
          Re: When parameters to printf are in memory James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 08:36 +0100
    Re: When parameters to printf are in memory jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-10-02 21:27 +0200

csiph-web