Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #598819
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: "Ordinary" Spin |
| Date | 2016-09-29 13:27 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <nsjmdj$d50$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <nsjc4r$dki$1@pcls7.std.com> <73066a00-827e-4680-99d0-63032c96ce79@googlegroups.com> <nsje84$1uo0$1@gioia.aioe.org> <37fca91e-c82d-4290-90fb-f276d20a28fd@googlegroups.com> <nsjm1v$cgs$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
On 9/29/2016 1:20 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 9/29/2016 1:07 PM, john wrote: >> Odd >> Sorry about that. >> >> What do YOU think about the >> idea that ordinary spin , as >> we know it, >> is actually Complex, >> or combined spin >> that has a precession of 0, >> and so is 1:0 (rotation:precession). >> >> And other complex spins exist at >> 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, etc? > > If you're talking about the "ordinary spin" of macroscopic objects like > discs and bricks, then I think your idea is nothing new, and in fact you > are missing "complex spins" like 1:1.4 and 1:3.53 and 1:0.022 which are > actually observed in nature. > > If you are thinking this has anything to do with quantum mechanical > spin, though.... no, I don't think this idea is able to demonstrate > compatibility with observed behavior of atomic systems. > > So there's your choice: applies at the macro level but is old news and > uninteresting; or doesn't apply at the micro level at all. As an example of the "old news" in macro physics, John, I invite you to put a rubber band around a book so that it doesn't open, and then toss it in the air in different ways so that it is rotating about the different symmetry axes of the book (there are three). You will likely observe that two of them have stable rotation but one of them doesn't and it starts to wobble in what you would call "complex rotation". At this point, you might shout "Aha! Look at that! My complex rotation idea is validated!" But then I would invite you to go to the library and check out the oldest book you can find that has the classical mechanical treatment of the rotation of a rectangular prism like a book. What will it tell you if the copyright of that book was somewhere around your great-grandfather's birthyear? > >> >> Baby idea, like Michael implies with >> the drool comment? >> Or minor epiphany? >> > > -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"Ordinary" Spin john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 10:48 -0700
"Ordinary" Spin john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 14:51 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-29 02:02 +0000
Re: "Ordinary" Spin Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 19:29 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 19:41 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-28 20:09 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 04:26 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 07:33 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-29 15:31 +0000
Re: "Ordinary" Spin john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 08:39 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 11:07 -0500
Re: "Ordinary" Spin john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 11:07 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 13:20 -0500
Re: "Ordinary" Spin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 13:27 -0500
Re: "Ordinary" Spin noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 11:27 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 20:41 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-29 03:34 +0000
Re: "Ordinary" Spin Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 11:03 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 20:54 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 23:11 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 10:14 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-30 11:06 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 12:09 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-30 12:55 -0700
csiph-web