Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #598812
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: "Ordinary" Spin |
| Date | 2016-09-29 13:20 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <nsjm1v$cgs$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <534d3fee-4dad-423c-99a6-b49dbbb3b9b3@googlegroups.com> <nsjc4r$dki$1@pcls7.std.com> <73066a00-827e-4680-99d0-63032c96ce79@googlegroups.com> <nsje84$1uo0$1@gioia.aioe.org> <37fca91e-c82d-4290-90fb-f276d20a28fd@googlegroups.com> |
On 9/29/2016 1:07 PM, john wrote: > Odd > Sorry about that. > > What do YOU think about the > idea that ordinary spin , as > we know it, > is actually Complex, > or combined spin > that has a precession of 0, > and so is 1:0 (rotation:precession). > > And other complex spins exist at > 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, etc? If you're talking about the "ordinary spin" of macroscopic objects like discs and bricks, then I think your idea is nothing new, and in fact you are missing "complex spins" like 1:1.4 and 1:3.53 and 1:0.022 which are actually observed in nature. If you are thinking this has anything to do with quantum mechanical spin, though.... no, I don't think this idea is able to demonstrate compatibility with observed behavior of atomic systems. So there's your choice: applies at the macro level but is old news and uninteresting; or doesn't apply at the micro level at all. > > Baby idea, like Michael implies with > the drool comment? > Or minor epiphany? > -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"Ordinary" Spin john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 10:48 -0700
"Ordinary" Spin john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 14:51 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-29 02:02 +0000
Re: "Ordinary" Spin Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 19:29 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 19:41 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-28 20:09 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 04:26 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 07:33 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-29 15:31 +0000
Re: "Ordinary" Spin john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 08:39 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 11:07 -0500
Re: "Ordinary" Spin john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 11:07 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 13:20 -0500
Re: "Ordinary" Spin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 13:27 -0500
Re: "Ordinary" Spin noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 11:27 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 20:41 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-29 03:34 +0000
Re: "Ordinary" Spin Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 11:03 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 20:54 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 23:11 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 10:14 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-30 11:06 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 12:09 -0700
Re: "Ordinary" Spin "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-30 12:55 -0700
csiph-web