Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #392249
| From | HGW <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Negative Gravity? |
| Date | 2016-09-14 08:35 +1000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <nr9uuv$1kfi$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <T9qdnSDvbqKnOl7KnZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com> <1413f0d7-11f1-4630-b314-79823a7ef187@googlegroups.com> <Y-Wdnd4k971GFlrKnZ2dnUU7_8xg4p2d@giganews.com> <nqd244$1jf8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <w9ednQ7zi8ryZlPKnZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
On 07/09/16 03:22, Tom Roberts wrote: > On 9/2/16 9/2/16 - 6:31 PM, HGWilson, DSc. wrote: >> Because we are not biologically equipped to actually SEE fields, we do >> not regard them as being material. This is most unscientific. > > Wilson just does not think things through, and has a VERY shallow > understanding of the world and how we humans relate to it. > > Paraphrasing: Because we are not biologically equipped to actually SEE > the sun at night, we do not regard it as being material. This is most > unscientific. > > How silly! And shallow. Essentially everything we humans do is based > upon our mental models of the world we inhabit. The vast majority of > those models are based on inferences and conclusions, not direct > observations. Wilson doesn't have a clue.... Certainly Physical theory has overcome many of our biological limitations but people like you still cannot see that even our concept of 3D space is purely psychological. Our brains merely receive electrical signals and portray the information as a mental graphic. We can never know the true form of space or whether other lifeforms visualize it differently. A red rose isn't 'red'. Our minds create the sensation of a 'colour' according to which electrical signals are received. It is known that some other animals can detect electric or magnetic fields and almost certainly display them somehow internally. We don't possess that ability. If somebody could come up with a way to make fields visible, that might help us to understand them. So I think Tom should learn a little psychology before making such purile remarks. > Tom Roberts --
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Negative Gravity? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-29 06:53 +1000
Negative Gravity? "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-28 18:08 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-28 22:08 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-29 21:01 +1000
Re: Negative Gravity? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-08-30 12:12 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-31 07:02 +1000
Re: Negative Gravity? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-08-30 15:10 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-31 10:16 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-08-31 23:07 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-02 19:15 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-04 07:59 +1000
Re: Negative Gravity? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-31 11:37 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-31 21:00 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-03 09:31 +1000
Re: Negative Gravity? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-02 18:05 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-03 08:19 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-03 09:55 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-04 08:00 +1000
Re: Negative Gravity? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-03 18:36 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-06 12:22 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-14 08:35 +1000
Re: Negative Gravity? Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 21:48 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-29 21:53 +1000
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-30 10:11 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-12 10:21 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-12 22:39 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-14 08:16 +1000
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-13 18:26 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-15 08:29 +1000
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-14 23:23 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-15 15:42 +0000
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-15 12:37 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-16 03:30 +0000
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-15 23:30 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-16 16:23 +0000
Re: Negative Gravity? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-16 06:40 +1000
Re: Negative Gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 16:13 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-16 03:34 +0000
Re: Negative Gravity? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-17 04:29 +1000
Re: Negative Gravity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-16 21:05 +0000
Re: Negative Gravity? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-13 15:58 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-13 18:40 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-14 12:56 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-14 13:34 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 15:40 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-14 23:53 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-16 11:37 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 14:21 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 14:21 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-16 22:25 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-19 12:43 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-19 17:01 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-20 08:37 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-20 09:23 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-20 17:54 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-20 20:15 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-21 12:32 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-21 15:03 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-21 07:48 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-17 04:41 +1000
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-19 11:14 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 23:20 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-29 08:59 -0700
Negative Gravity? "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-29 09:57 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-08-31 11:48 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-31 14:16 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-31 14:46 -0700
csiph-web