Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #391434
| From | "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Negative Gravity? |
| Date | 2016-09-03 09:31 +1000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <nqd244$1jf8$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <npviv9$shm$1@gioia.aioe.org> <T9qdnSDvbqKnOl7KnZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com> <1413f0d7-11f1-4630-b314-79823a7ef187@googlegroups.com> <Y-Wdnd4k971GFlrKnZ2dnUU7_8xg4p2d@giganews.com> |
On 01/09/16 12:00, Tom Roberts wrote: > On 8/31/16 8/31/16 1:37 PM, RichD wrote: >> On August 28, tjrob137 wrote: >>> Quite a lot is known about the four forces, but only by people >>> who actually study modern physics. For instance they all obey >>> local Lorentz invariance. They all cannot influence anything over >>> a spacelike interval. They all can be modeled extremely well as >>> gauge theories. Etc. >>> >>> Both the strong and weak nuclear forces can also attract and >>> repel. Moreover, the structures of the different gauge theories >>> of these forces explain why gravity is attractive only while the >>> other three are both attractive and repulsive. >> >> What about quantum gravity? Will there be anti-gravitons? > > Presumably not; like the other neutral gauge bosons, the graviton > should "be its own anti particle" (or rather, the concept "anti" does > not apply). We should regard even the most advanced humans as being very primitive. Because we are not biologically equipped to actually SEE fields, we do not regard them as being material. This is most unscientific. The reason why some electric charges repel and some attract is either because something unknown is going on in the space between them OR our whole concept of space is wrong. > Tom Roberts
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Negative Gravity? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-29 06:53 +1000
Negative Gravity? "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-28 18:08 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-28 22:08 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-29 21:01 +1000
Re: Negative Gravity? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-08-30 12:12 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-31 07:02 +1000
Re: Negative Gravity? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-08-30 15:10 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-31 10:16 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-08-31 23:07 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-02 19:15 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-04 07:59 +1000
Re: Negative Gravity? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-31 11:37 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-31 21:00 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-03 09:31 +1000
Re: Negative Gravity? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-02 18:05 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-03 08:19 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-03 09:55 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-04 08:00 +1000
Re: Negative Gravity? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-03 18:36 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-06 12:22 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-14 08:35 +1000
Re: Negative Gravity? Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 21:48 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-29 21:53 +1000
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-30 10:11 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-12 10:21 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-12 22:39 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-14 08:16 +1000
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-13 18:26 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-15 08:29 +1000
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-14 23:23 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-15 15:42 +0000
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-15 12:37 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-16 03:30 +0000
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-15 23:30 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-16 16:23 +0000
Re: Negative Gravity? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-16 06:40 +1000
Re: Negative Gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 16:13 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-16 03:34 +0000
Re: Negative Gravity? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-17 04:29 +1000
Re: Negative Gravity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-16 21:05 +0000
Re: Negative Gravity? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-13 15:58 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-13 18:40 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-14 12:56 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-14 13:34 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 15:40 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-14 23:53 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-16 11:37 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 14:21 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 14:21 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-16 22:25 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-19 12:43 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-19 17:01 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-20 08:37 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-20 09:23 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-20 17:54 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-20 20:15 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-21 12:32 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-21 15:03 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-21 07:48 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-17 04:41 +1000
Re: Negative Gravity? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-19 11:14 -0500
Re: Negative Gravity? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 23:20 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-29 08:59 -0700
Negative Gravity? "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-29 09:57 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-08-31 11:48 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-31 14:16 -0700
Re: Negative Gravity? "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-31 14:46 -0700
csiph-web