Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #391162

Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics

From	"HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics
Date	2016-08-29 20:40 +1000
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<nq13f6$1123$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(15 earlier) <c9WdnRjcdLuXgSPKnZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com> <npmfnd$uft$1@gioia.aioe.org> <eoWdnZ84BZlWlF7KnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com> <npvfs6$o05$1@gioia.aioe.org> <V_2dnSc1cPfbPl7KnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 29/08/16 12:51, Tom Roberts wrote:
> On 8/28/16 8/28/16   3:00 PM, HGWilson, DSc. wrote:

>> How can you explain the fact that a great many star curves have
>> the exact shapes predicted by the theory that is based on the
>> assumption light moves ballistically from stars which pulsate in
>> certain prescribed ways or are moving in precise elliptical orbits.
>> As a successful physicist, you should be vitally interested in such
>> a relationship.
>
> Not so. You again show your colossal IGNORANCE of what science
> actually is. I don't need to "explain" how or why your model appears
> to provide an assumption about certain stars' light curves. Because
> the observations of both visible binaries and spectroscopic binaries
> REFUTE YOUR MODEL.
>
> Remember this is supposed to be SCIENCE, in which a single refutation
> is sufficient to demonstrate that a given model is not valid. Your
> model is not valid. It does not matter how many instances your model
> seems to work for, as there are MANY for which it DOES NOT WORK.

No credible experiment has refuted the obvious fact that light behaves 
ballistically.
>
>
>> What else would cause stars to vary in brightness in such a
>> precisely predictable manner?
>
> That is NOT the way science works. Again you display you colossal
> IGNORANCE.

You obviously have no aptitude for physics. No physicist would behave 
the way you do. You are nothing but a science historian and second rate 
journalist who is incapable of original thought.
The fact that most star curves follow a certain narrow pattern is
extremely interesting whether my theory is right or wrong.

No genuine physicist would ignore such facts. They would at least look 
for alternative explanations even if they insisted on
rejecting the obvious truth that there is no absolute frame and light 
speed must be and IS source dependent.

> Tom Roberts
>

Thread

Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-16 12:16 -0700
  Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 13:17 -0700
    Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGW." <hw@....> - 2016-08-17 08:34 +1000
      Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 16:04 -0700
        Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGW." <hw@....> - 2016-08-17 13:43 +1000
          Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-17 00:12 -0700
            Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-19 05:31 +1000
              Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 13:20 -0700
                Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-19 06:38 +1000
                Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 13:59 -0700
  Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 17:33 -0500
    Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-22 12:12 -0700
      Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-23 10:56 -0700
        Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-23 12:13 -0700
          Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-24 06:29 +1000
        Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-23 18:47 -0500
          Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-25 03:36 +1000
            Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-24 21:00 +0200
            Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-24 17:13 -0500
              Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-25 20:02 +1000
                Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-28 10:56 -0500
                Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-29 06:00 +1000
                Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-28 21:51 -0500
                Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-29 20:40 +1000
                Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 07:04 -0700
                Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-30 05:17 +1000
                Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-30 08:59 -0500
                Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics astrofoton@interia.pl - 2016-08-30 10:45 -0700
                Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGW." <hw@....> - 2016-09-05 16:28 +1000
                Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-06 10:14 -0500
                Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-09-06 20:39 +0200
                Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-07 05:55 +1000
                Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-12 11:41 -0500
                Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-13 09:20 +1000
                Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 22:34 -0700
                Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-29 14:11 +0200
              Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-08-25 03:13 -0700
    Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-23 05:59 +1000
      Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-08-22 22:59 -0700
        Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-23 19:42 +1000
          Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-08-23 03:17 -0700
            Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-24 06:34 +1000

csiph-web