Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #391136
| From | "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics |
| Date | 2016-08-29 06:00 +1000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <npvfs6$o05$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (15 earlier) <MeKdnQN_d9QPfSHKnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com> <npkltr$be5$1@gioia.aioe.org> <c9WdnRjcdLuXgSPKnZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com> <npmfnd$uft$1@gioia.aioe.org> <eoWdnZ84BZlWlF7KnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
On 29/08/16 01:56, Tom Roberts wrote: > On 8/25/16 8/25/16 5:02 AM, HGWilson, DSc. wrote: >> On 25/08/16 08:13, Tom Roberts wrote: >>> You REALLY don't understand science, or scientists. >> >> I fully understand failed scientists like Tom Roberts. > > You don't "understand" me at all. I am not "failed" except in your > personal fantasy world. In the real world I am a successful > professional physicist and earn a good living at it. I also made a successful living out of being a professional physicist for twenty years till I got sick of putting up with useless academics like some people here. > I actually have two independent jobs that reflect my varied interests > and expertise in physics. We know what one is....publicity agent for THE GRAND CONSPIRACY. How much do they pay you to keep the name 'Einstein' alive on physics forums? >> Well why doesn't someone follow up my variable star discoveries >> which clearly show that light travels at different speeds towards >> Earth. > > Again your colossal IGNORANCE is showing. There are many > observations of binary star systems, both visual binaries and > spectroscopic binaries, that directly contradict that. If light > traveled at c+v towards earth, they would look COMPLETELY DIFFERENT > from what is observed. How can you explain the fact that a great many star curves have the exact shapes predicted by the theory that is based on the assumption light moves ballistically from stars which pulsate in certain prescribed ways or are moving in precise elliptical orbits. As a successful physicist, you should be vitally interested in such a relationship. What else would cause stars to vary in brightness in such a precisely predictable manner? The fact that Cepheids in particular behave exactly like this represents a far greater discovery than that of Henrietta Leavitt. > Tom Roberts >
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-16 12:16 -0700
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 13:17 -0700
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGW." <hw@....> - 2016-08-17 08:34 +1000
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 16:04 -0700
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGW." <hw@....> - 2016-08-17 13:43 +1000
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-17 00:12 -0700
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-19 05:31 +1000
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 13:20 -0700
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-19 06:38 +1000
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 13:59 -0700
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 17:33 -0500
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-22 12:12 -0700
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-23 10:56 -0700
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-23 12:13 -0700
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-24 06:29 +1000
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-23 18:47 -0500
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-25 03:36 +1000
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-24 21:00 +0200
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-24 17:13 -0500
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-25 20:02 +1000
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-28 10:56 -0500
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-29 06:00 +1000
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-28 21:51 -0500
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-29 20:40 +1000
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 07:04 -0700
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-30 05:17 +1000
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-30 08:59 -0500
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics astrofoton@interia.pl - 2016-08-30 10:45 -0700
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGW." <hw@....> - 2016-09-05 16:28 +1000
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-06 10:14 -0500
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-09-06 20:39 +0200
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-07 05:55 +1000
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-12 11:41 -0500
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-13 09:20 +1000
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 22:34 -0700
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-29 14:11 +0200
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-08-25 03:13 -0700
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-23 05:59 +1000
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-08-22 22:59 -0700
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-23 19:42 +1000
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-08-23 03:17 -0700
Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-24 06:34 +1000
csiph-web